I know I am going against my norm on this as a "just get on with bans" but I do feel sorry for those who got hit with a perma ban over this.I think the best part is if you exploited the banker survey months ago plus exploited AP Boosting you got a perma ban...strike one if you only AP boosted and I hope they are fearful on the next exploit because I'd bet these people will exploit in the future who got banned today.
We all know it's a matter of time for another exploit I hope these people have harsher punishments.
AbraXuSeXile wrote: »Its good action was taken but when everyone was begging for an answer on if its allowed or not and totally ignored it. Then 1 month later its like oh yeah remember when you farrmed AP? It was bad take your ban lol.
At least communicate with people at the time its going on.
Now Abrax, they already had punished people abusing roe mine ressource ap bug, in the end it's nothing to be surprised about.
Agreed so much, I am really mixed on my feelings for this.The hypocrisy in this thread is pretty funny.
Some of the people rejoicing here have happily exploited in the past, some are known gold sellers etc. The amount of people pointing fingers when they are far from clean is hilarious.
Zos handled this pretty poorly if you ask me.
1. Letting this go live, even with the crap ton of warning they got from a lot of players that keep/outpost flipping would happen.
2. Not monitoring the EU server and posting stats exposing their ignorance on what was going on on all platforms, ignoring the proof spam posted and spoon fed to them.
3. Not putting out info that this behaviour wasn't ok and that they were looking into taking action (there's no exploit if you ask me, it's morally questionnable ofc but unlike BB mine, the AP values here were 100% intended by ZOS)
4. Not resetting ranks, not taking into account the gold that was made with the laundered AP. If they had done something waaaaay earlier about this, money laundering etc wouldn't have been an issue.
The only positive outcome from this is that people will think twice about exploiting/cheating/whatever fishy thing.
ZOS_JessicaFolsom wrote: »Hi everyone,
We just completed a mass action on a few hundred accounts that were involved in regular coordinated cross-alliance AP farming. Specifically, swapping resources and keeps to farm high amounts of AP in a short period of time. Not only does this behavior harm our PvP gameplay and community, but it is also a Terms of Service violation. Accounts found taking part in cross-alliance AP farming may be subject to disciplinary actions.
Here’s the break-down of the accounts we took action on and where they were:Those involved have received a three-day suspension at minimum and removal of all AP from their accounts. If you were involved, you have received an email with an official warning.
- PC/Mac – Europe: 170 accounts
- PlayStation 4 – Europe: 42 accounts
- PlayStation 4 – North America: 39 accounts
- Xbox One – Europe: 50 accounts
- Xbox One – North America: 61 accounts
Thank you to everyone who reported this exploit. Please help us keep ESO’s PvP content fun, competitive, and fair for all.
The hypocrisy in this thread is pretty funny.
Some of the people rejoicing here have happily exploited in the past, some are known gold sellers etc. The amount of people pointing fingers when they are far from clean is hilarious.
Zos handled this pretty poorly if you ask me.
1. Letting this go live, even with the crap ton of warning they got from a lot of players that keep/outpost flipping would happen.
2. Not monitoring the EU server and posting stats exposing their ignorance on what was going on on all platforms, ignoring the proof spam posted and spoon fed to them.
3. Not putting out info that this behaviour wasn't ok and that they were looking into taking action (there's no exploit if you ask me, it's morally questionnable ofc but unlike BB mine, the AP values here were 100% intended by ZOS)
4. Not resetting ranks, not taking into account the gold that was made with the laundered AP. If they had done something waaaaay earlier about this, money laundering etc wouldn't have been an issue.
The only positive outcome from this is that people will think twice about exploiting/cheating/whatever fishy thing.
The hypocrisy in this thread is pretty funny.
Some of the people rejoicing here have happily exploited in the past, some are known gold sellers etc. The amount of people pointing fingers when they are far from clean is hilarious.
Zos handled this pretty poorly if you ask me.
1. Letting this go live, even with the crap ton of warning they got from a lot of players that keep/outpost flipping would happen.
2. Not monitoring the EU server and posting stats exposing their ignorance on what was going on on all platforms, ignoring the proof spam posted and spoon fed to them.
3. Not putting out info that this behaviour wasn't ok and that they were looking into taking action (there's no exploit if you ask me, it's morally questionnable ofc but unlike BB mine, the AP values here were 100% intended by ZOS)
4. Not resetting ranks, not taking into account the gold that was made with the laundered AP. If they had done something waaaaay earlier about this, money laundering etc wouldn't have been an issue.
The only positive outcome from this is that people will think twice about exploiting/cheating/whatever fishy thing.
ExcaliburESO wrote: »The hypocrisy in this thread is pretty funny.
Some of the people rejoicing here have happily exploited in the past, some are known gold sellers etc. The amount of people pointing fingers when they are far from clean is hilarious.
Zos handled this pretty poorly if you ask me.
1. Letting this go live, even with the crap ton of warning they got from a lot of players that keep/outpost flipping would happen.
2. Not monitoring the EU server and posting stats exposing their ignorance on what was going on on all platforms, ignoring the proof spam posted and spoon fed to them.
3. Not putting out info that this behaviour wasn't ok and that they were looking into taking action (there's no exploit if you ask me, it's morally questionnable ofc but unlike BB mine, the AP values here were 100% intended by ZOS)
4. Not resetting ranks, not taking into account the gold that was made with the laundered AP. If they had done something waaaaay earlier about this, money laundering etc wouldn't have been an issue.
The only positive outcome from this is that people will think twice about exploiting/cheating/whatever fishy thing.
I agree 100% with @Etaniel zos knew it gonna happen and now they suspend acc cuz of their own ignorance? Its zos fault not ours. We do it in most efficient way always!
ExcaliburESO wrote: »The hypocrisy in this thread is pretty funny.
Some of the people rejoicing here have happily exploited in the past, some are known gold sellers etc. The amount of people pointing fingers when they are far from clean is hilarious.
Zos handled this pretty poorly if you ask me.
1. Letting this go live, even with the crap ton of warning they got from a lot of players that keep/outpost flipping would happen.
2. Not monitoring the EU server and posting stats exposing their ignorance on what was going on on all platforms, ignoring the proof spam posted and spoon fed to them.
3. Not putting out info that this behaviour wasn't ok and that they were looking into taking action (there's no exploit if you ask me, it's morally questionnable ofc but unlike BB mine, the AP values here were 100% intended by ZOS)
4. Not resetting ranks, not taking into account the gold that was made with the laundered AP. If they had done something waaaaay earlier about this, money laundering etc wouldn't have been an issue.
The only positive outcome from this is that people will think twice about exploiting/cheating/whatever fishy thing.
I agree 100% with @Etaniel zos knew it gonna happen and now they suspend acc cuz of their own ignorance? Its zos fault not ours. We do it in most efficient way always!
I'm not saying that it was wrong to suspend / ban people though. I'm saying it shouldn't have come to this, but after letting this be rampant for so long, punishments were inevitable and expected.
ZOS_JessicaFolsom wrote: »bulbousb16_ESO wrote: »A three-day suspension for outright TOS violation? And we want them back... why?
If this was their first offense, they got a three-day suspension and lose all their AP as a warning. If they do it again, it'll be a ban. Some who had previous TOS violations were permanently banned.
I think they made a good call. Having had multiple threads, weeks and an ESO Live to explain this was against ToS they chose not to. Giving a full account ban now would be pretty unfair. I say that as the whiny guy who complained about it constantly.ZOS_JessicaFolsom wrote: »bulbousb16_ESO wrote: »A three-day suspension for outright TOS violation? And we want them back... why?
If this was their first offense, they got a three-day suspension and lose all their AP as a warning. If they do it again, it'll be a ban. Some who had previous TOS violations were permanently banned.
ZO$ Banned=/=Banned LOL
ExcaliburESO wrote: »ExcaliburESO wrote: »The hypocrisy in this thread is pretty funny.
Some of the people rejoicing here have happily exploited in the past, some are known gold sellers etc. The amount of people pointing fingers when they are far from clean is hilarious.
Zos handled this pretty poorly if you ask me.
1. Letting this go live, even with the crap ton of warning they got from a lot of players that keep/outpost flipping would happen.
2. Not monitoring the EU server and posting stats exposing their ignorance on what was going on on all platforms, ignoring the proof spam posted and spoon fed to them.
3. Not putting out info that this behaviour wasn't ok and that they were looking into taking action (there's no exploit if you ask me, it's morally questionnable ofc but unlike BB mine, the AP values here were 100% intended by ZOS)
4. Not resetting ranks, not taking into account the gold that was made with the laundered AP. If they had done something waaaaay earlier about this, money laundering etc wouldn't have been an issue.
The only positive outcome from this is that people will think twice about exploiting/cheating/whatever fishy thing.
I agree 100% with @Etaniel zos knew it gonna happen and now they suspend acc cuz of their own ignorance? Its zos fault not ours. We do it in most efficient way always!
I'm not saying that it was wrong to suspend / ban people though. I'm saying it shouldn't have come to this, but after letting this be rampant for so long, punishments were inevitable and expected.
Im fine with my suspension but next time zos should prevent this to happen instead of letting it even making double ap for it and then oh soz u all exploiters get rekt noobs...
The hypocrisy in this thread is pretty funny.
Some of the people rejoicing here have happily exploited in the past, some are known gold sellers etc. The amount of people pointing fingers when they are far from clean is hilarious.
Zos handled this pretty poorly if you ask me.
1. Letting this go live, even with the crap ton of warning they got from a lot of players that keep/outpost flipping would happen.
2. Not monitoring the EU server and posting stats exposing their ignorance on what was going on on all platforms, ignoring the proof spam posted and spoon fed to them.
3. Not putting out info that this behaviour wasn't ok and that they were looking into taking action (there's no exploit if you ask me, it's morally questionnable ofc but unlike BB mine, the AP values here were 100% intended by ZOS)
4. Not resetting ranks, not taking into account the gold that was made with the laundered AP. If they had done something waaaaay earlier about this, money laundering etc wouldn't have been an issue.
The only positive outcome from this is that people will think twice about exploiting/cheating/whatever fishy thing.
Most sensible post in this thread along with the words of @Turelus, @itzTJ and @AbraXuSeXile, also love your videos @Etaniel!
So much hipocrisy going on in here, both from players and from ZOS; people condemning others when they participated themselves - no matter how grand a claim they have of trying to stop the farm, and ZOS saying nothing when the issue was raised on forums - only to later decide to take action. I know a certain developer actually came on the European server and went to Bleaker's in his spare time to note down names. This time could have been spend making a post on the subject on forums instead. It's a very childish behaviour and I know this person did it only because he was so "sick and tired of people abusing stuff" - same reason someone even got banned for the Rakkhat exploit at all. I am happy that the developers are passionate about the game, but they need to revise how they handle things and it needs to be less on a personal level.
Also while they claim that the suspensions were based on other metrics than just AP gained I think it was very inconsistent. I see players still online who were far worse than others who got suspended - Kodi dueled some of them on stream yesterday.
That being said I think the suspensions were fair; ZOS has taken a stance. I just think that stance should have been taken when this was ongoing so people had a chance to react accordingly. This was at best a grey area of the ToS and this is why we saw so many people participate in this and why people, including me, participated in discussions on the subject while it was ongoing. Also one could argue whether its fair that people who already spend the AP get almost no penalty while people who didn't spend it and maybe had AP saved up before event, or made a ton of AP after the event. get it all taken away. I know this is a game and not real life, but one could draw a parallel to a thief who steals; the goods will be taken away and he will be put in jail - he does not automatically forfeit everything he owned prior to his transgression. Once again I emphasize that this was a grey area of the ToS which is why so many people participated and ZOS is to blaim for not spending rescources on adressing the issue before and instead using players as scapegoats and pointing the arrows away from themselves. It's clever and effective because people fall for it (just like in real life politics), but a very, very, very bad approach.
Also I never throught I would see a community manager actually participate in an ongoing server versus server debate and stoke the fires - favorizing one server over the other.
Plus let's not forget that ZOS lied about facts prior to the event in an attempt to cool the situation down; as someone already pointed out by quoting both Wheelers post prior to the event and the post Jessica made yesterday.
TL;DR version:
Both white knight players and ZOS are being hypocrites, the suspensions was completely fair but ZOS should have taken a stance before since this was a grey area in the ToS, community managers should not participate in server versus server discussions and developers should not post false statistics in an attempt to quelch an ongoing issue or prioritize rescources during the event to note down names instead of just posting on foums that actions will be taken if the behaviour continues.
EDIT: This will be my only post on this thread and final post on this matter. Done is done. If people want to adress me or anything I said feel free to PM me.
While I was and am against it. I have to say we really didn't know it was against ToS. It technically wasn't an exploit and no where has ZOS ever handed out bans for working with the enemy.Stop those pathetic excuses. Everyone knew that teaming up with enemy to feed AP to each other is breaking TOS, but noone cares coz "ZOS won't punish anyway". Enjoy it now.
ExcaliburESO wrote: »ExcaliburESO wrote: »The hypocrisy in this thread is pretty funny.
Some of the people rejoicing here have happily exploited in the past, some are known gold sellers etc. The amount of people pointing fingers when they are far from clean is hilarious.
Zos handled this pretty poorly if you ask me.
1. Letting this go live, even with the crap ton of warning they got from a lot of players that keep/outpost flipping would happen.
2. Not monitoring the EU server and posting stats exposing their ignorance on what was going on on all platforms, ignoring the proof spam posted and spoon fed to them.
3. Not putting out info that this behaviour wasn't ok and that they were looking into taking action (there's no exploit if you ask me, it's morally questionnable ofc but unlike BB mine, the AP values here were 100% intended by ZOS)
4. Not resetting ranks, not taking into account the gold that was made with the laundered AP. If they had done something waaaaay earlier about this, money laundering etc wouldn't have been an issue.
The only positive outcome from this is that people will think twice about exploiting/cheating/whatever fishy thing.
I agree 100% with @Etaniel zos knew it gonna happen and now they suspend acc cuz of their own ignorance? Its zos fault not ours. We do it in most efficient way always!
I'm not saying that it was wrong to suspend / ban people though. I'm saying it shouldn't have come to this, but after letting this be rampant for so long, punishments were inevitable and expected.
Im fine with my suspension but next time zos should prevent this to happen instead of letting it even making double ap for it and then oh soz u all exploiters get rekt noobs...
Stop those pathetic excuses. Everyone knew that teaming up with enemy to feed AP to each other is breaking TOS, but noone cares coz "ZOS won't punish anyway". Enjoy it now.
ExcaliburESO wrote: »The hypocrisy in this thread is pretty funny.
Some of the people rejoicing here have happily exploited in the past, some are known gold sellers etc. The amount of people pointing fingers when they are far from clean is hilarious.
Zos handled this pretty poorly if you ask me.
1. Letting this go live, even with the crap ton of warning they got from a lot of players that keep/outpost flipping would happen.
2. Not monitoring the EU server and posting stats exposing their ignorance on what was going on on all platforms, ignoring the proof spam posted and spoon fed to them.
3. Not putting out info that this behaviour wasn't ok and that they were looking into taking action (there's no exploit if you ask me, it's morally questionnable ofc but unlike BB mine, the AP values here were 100% intended by ZOS)
4. Not resetting ranks, not taking into account the gold that was made with the laundered AP. If they had done something waaaaay earlier about this, money laundering etc wouldn't have been an issue.
The only positive outcome from this is that people will think twice about exploiting/cheating/whatever fishy thing.
I agree 100% with @Etaniel zos knew it gonna happen and now they suspend acc cuz of their own ignorance? Its zos fault not ours. We do it in most efficient way always!
I'm not saying that it was wrong to suspend / ban people though. I'm saying it shouldn't have come to this, but after letting this be rampant for so long, punishments were inevitable and expected.
We can only hope they learnt from this and take steps towards better communication next time as well as better tools to monitor the EU servers.AllPlayAndNoWork wrote: »ExcaliburESO wrote: »The hypocrisy in this thread is pretty funny.
Some of the people rejoicing here have happily exploited in the past, some are known gold sellers etc. The amount of people pointing fingers when they are far from clean is hilarious.
Zos handled this pretty poorly if you ask me.
1. Letting this go live, even with the crap ton of warning they got from a lot of players that keep/outpost flipping would happen.
2. Not monitoring the EU server and posting stats exposing their ignorance on what was going on on all platforms, ignoring the proof spam posted and spoon fed to them.
3. Not putting out info that this behaviour wasn't ok and that they were looking into taking action (there's no exploit if you ask me, it's morally questionnable ofc but unlike BB mine, the AP values here were 100% intended by ZOS)
4. Not resetting ranks, not taking into account the gold that was made with the laundered AP. If they had done something waaaaay earlier about this, money laundering etc wouldn't have been an issue.
The only positive outcome from this is that people will think twice about exploiting/cheating/whatever fishy thing.
I agree 100% with Etaniel zos knew it gonna happen and now they suspend acc cuz of their own ignorance? Its zos fault not ours. We do it in most efficient way always!
I'm not saying that it was wrong to suspend / ban people though. I'm saying it shouldn't have come to this, but after letting this be rampant for so long, punishments were inevitable and expected.
Agree 100% on this. If anything ZoS has let themselves down in allowing it to get this far. And the community down by not saying anything when it was happening.
Rohamad_Ali wrote: »Stop .. Just stop . Don't blame the players that are happy to see ZoS finally making a move in the right direction to stop exploiting . I have never participated in any exploits and neither has a lot of people . Grow up . If you honestly thought giving keeps or outposts to one another was intended game play you are a special kind of ignorant . It's a PVP ZONE .
ZoS has made several posts that even if somethings feel like cheating , don't do it . If you are unsure , don't do it .
anitajoneb17_ESO wrote: »Rohamad_Ali wrote: »Stop .. Just stop . Don't blame the players that are happy to see ZoS finally making a move in the right direction to stop exploiting . I have never participated in any exploits and neither has a lot of people . Grow up . If you honestly thought giving keeps or outposts to one another was intended game play you are a special kind of ignorant . It's a PVP ZONE .
ZoS has made several posts that even if somethings feel like cheating , don't do it . If you are unsure , don't do it .
If we follow your reasoning, cross-alliance organization of DUELS and DUELLING TOURNAMENTS prior to the One Tamriel update was exploiting, too.
As to the "if you're unsure, don't do it", sorry but this is a game. By default, everything the game lets me do, alone or in arrangement with other players, is OK. I should not be compromising my gaming freedom by having to wonder all the time whether what I'm doing is "OK" or "not OK", just because it's not in the original game design. People are organizing cross-country jumping contests in their home with pieces of FURNITURE which wasn't designed but can be used for that purpose.
If ZOS decides that any behaviour for whatever reason is an "exploit", they should say it clearly. It's not hard.
The problem with the feels like cheating don't is ZOS set precedents for this before, for example Emperor trading, nothing happened and no one ever got in trouble.Rohamad_Ali wrote: »ZoS has made several posts that even if somethings feel like cheating , don't do it . If you are unsure , don't do it . These gamers are not 7 year old kids that need parental guidance to follow the rules of the game and be told "you kids be good" every day . Take some responsibility for your actions and don't pass the blame . No one likes a fink after they get busted
Rohamad_Ali wrote: »Bah ! Get with the program and save the lawyer talk for a courtroom where it makes money .
The problem they face with that one is the evidence that's how the Nightblade got there and not just staying inside after walls go up.White wabbit wrote: »So are Zos going to answer if a nightblade using gap closer into a keep is an exploit as I'm fed up of travelling to a keep-and getting killed by hidden Nightblades
White wabbit wrote: »So are Zos going to answer if a nightblade using gap closer into a keep is an exploit as I'm fed up of travelling to a keep-and getting killed by hidden Nightblades