I'll sub for as long as I think it is worth it. But subbing for the lifetime of a game without knowing whether I will feel the same in the future, or indeed have the time to play in the future, would be a bit naive on my part.
Bombashaman wrote: »In a heartbeat. Did same in LOTRO, and have now played it thousands of hours. Good investment.
Maybe for you, and that's fine. But not for me, hence my response.runkorkoeb17_ESO wrote: »Depend of the price.
Yes life time sub simply say they have economical issues or don't see an future in the game.I have been sub any time I have played the game but I would rather they didn't do a lifetime sub option.
Simply because it's not a great business model for them, a bunch of money up front and then never having reliable steady income again from that person.
TBH I have always felt lifetime subs are options given by games that know they won't last a very long time and want to grab cash whilst they can.
Riga_Mortis wrote: »ZOS needs to earn and maintain subs not just get handed lump sums like a premium pass for dlcs for example.
that literally would be like handing your wallet to a guy in a stripey t-shirt with a bag marked 'swag' over his shoulder.