SquareSausage wrote: »People are being too harsh on tanner, im geneuinely sorry for you mate, its terrible that people do this, you are obviously a guy meaning well by his guild, just need to take it as a lesson, no new players should ever have access to the bank, end of, thats it, people/strangers cant be trusted in real life, let alone a game where there is literally no accountability whatsoever. Just need to be more strict on the withdrawal policies and who you promote.
IronCrystal wrote: »Sorry for your guild losses, but did is going to remove the video since names aren't blurred
Out of curiosity, why is the names not being blurred in the video a problem for ZOS? I understand not allowing them to be put inside the forum post itself, but where does it state that even names inside a video (hosted elsewhere) has to have the names blurred out?
It's part of naming and shaming.
Yeah I haven't joined or made a guild specifically because of the limitations in place. It'd be nice to see some improvements made.
Being a guild member is safe and mostly if you only list items for sale in the guild store, there's no risk to you.
The guild sale system generally works very well, the only things i don't like about it are a guild has to have 50 members before they can make sales, even to each other.
You can only list 30 items per guild, so while that might mean 150 items in total if you're in the max five guilds, for me for example only being in three proper trading guilds, i'm basically limited to selling 90 items in total.
While you will find guilds which freely let members make sales and access the bank (even with the theft dangers of the current system).
But in particular, the way guilds have to hire traders with blind auctions and the typically sillily high cost of winning bids of many of the traders, mean that guilds go to varying lengths to raise gold.
In any guild, they get a small amount of gold whenever you list something for sale and a significant amount when you make a sale.
Many guilds are happy to only receive these cuts of the sales.
Many other guilds still fairly, only request gold donations to go towards hiring traders.
Others let you freely make sales, but request donations to access the guild bank which i mostly ignore, mostly being happy with being able to sell stuff.
Others have a mixture of donations for bank access and "raffles", which players are free join at their choice.
Some things though which guilds do to raise money are pushing the limits of fairness, like demanding players pay "donations" each week (in this case, i feel that's blackmail, actually blackmail), to remain in such guilds.
The worse thing i've seen, literally one guild do, is demand donations to even access the guild bank - that to me is 100% a scam.
On guild store sales, while you're free to leave guilds at any time or may find yourself kicked out of a guild without warning or a reason, thankfully you get your listed items back, less the small fee it cost to list them, though a further problem with the guild bank system, you don't get any of your deposited items back :_ .
<snip> many players will leave a guild the instant that they see they don't have full privileges. <snip>
No offence but that adds up to about 874 coins
Stopnaggin wrote: »Yeah I haven't joined or made a guild specifically because of the limitations in place. It'd be nice to see some improvements made.
Being a guild member is safe and mostly if you only list items for sale in the guild store, there's no risk to you.
The guild sale system generally works very well, the only things i don't like about it are a guild has to have 50 members before they can make sales, even to each other.
You can only list 30 items per guild, so while that might mean 150 items in total if you're in the max five guilds, for me for example only being in three proper trading guilds, i'm basically limited to selling 90 items in total.
While you will find guilds which freely let members make sales and access the bank (even with the theft dangers of the current system).
But in particular, the way guilds have to hire traders with blind auctions and the typically sillily high cost of winning bids of many of the traders, mean that guilds go to varying lengths to raise gold.
In any guild, they get a small amount of gold whenever you list something for sale and a significant amount when you make a sale.
Many guilds are happy to only receive these cuts of the sales.
Many other guilds still fairly, only request gold donations to go towards hiring traders.
Others let you freely make sales, but request donations to access the guild bank which i mostly ignore, mostly being happy with being able to sell stuff.
Others have a mixture of donations for bank access and "raffles", which players are free join at their choice.
Some things though which guilds do to raise money are pushing the limits of fairness, like demanding players pay "donations" each week (in this case, i feel that's blackmail, actually blackmail), to remain in such guilds.
The worse thing i've seen, literally one guild do, is demand donations to even access the guild bank - that to me is 100% a scam.
On guild store sales, while you're free to leave guilds at any time or may find yourself kicked out of a guild without warning or a reason, thankfully you get your listed items back, less the small fee it cost to list them, though a further problem with the guild bank system, you don't get any of your deposited items back :_ .
Actually 5k a week for trader access isn't that bad. They have to get enough in the bank to make bids. And I believe the gm should earn some sort of "pay" to keep track of everything. I'm no gm but I know what kind of work a good one puts in, and it's not easy. Keeping up with memebers, trying to maintain a trader, coming up with contest and activities to bring gold in and trying to keep everyone informed of what's going on.
I also know what a bad gm does as one of my former guild was disbanded after the gm was caught selling gold. With him being banned there was no one else to bid on traders and after a month almost everyone quit. Him and his Co gm both got banned.
Last little note, never put anything in the bank you don't want to lose. It's too much risk honestly.
Sorry to be harsh, but opening access to everyone like that was naive. Guild bank theft has been a thing since at least WoW's debut in 2004. New guildies aren't being "punished", by not being immediately allowed to go nuts in your bank. Most (smart) guilds don't allow that. They can ask an officer for what they want, and gain access themselves after a probation period.
Would you keep your house unlocked at all times, even when your neighbors weren't home, just so they could come in? Then what if some stranger got into your neighborhood and cleaned out your house? By putting a lock on the door, yeah every single trustworthy neighbor can't come and go 24/7, but by locking the door you're keeping your stuff protected for those who you trust and deserve access.
IronCrystal wrote: »Sorry for your guild losses, but did is going to remove the video since names aren't blurred
Out of curiosity, why is the names not being blurred in the video a problem for ZOS? I understand not allowing them to be put inside the forum post itself, but where does it state that even names inside a video (hosted elsewhere) has to have the names blurred out?
It's part of naming and shaming.
As i said in another comment:-
Anytime you're playing online, your player name and other details are being broadcast at least to everyone playing with you, in addition everyone playing with you could potentially be capturing the footage to post on sites like Youtube later or be livestreaming it on sites, again like Youtube or Twitch etc.
I've 300+ gaming videos on my channel which potentially show the player names and other details of countless gamers and none of them has every been flagged for removal.
The only difference with this video is that it shows the bad actions of one player, the same actions the currently nearly 60 people left in the guild (sure many of them haven't logged in in a nearly a year, but any could come back at any time), can read in the history of the guild at any time..
(I'm low level in my other three guilds, but i can read all their history.)
When you do something in an online game, it's public and you're warned in several ways on most online services you use.
About the only way i could see Zenimax objecting to this thread (or my video) is IF they punish the player in question, told me by email and instructed me to not discuss whatever actions they'd taken - my footage is no different to a live stream or any other captured online video.
IronCrystal wrote: »Sorry for your guild losses, but did is going to remove the video since names aren't blurred
Out of curiosity, why is the names not being blurred in the video a problem for ZOS? I understand not allowing them to be put inside the forum post itself, but where does it state that even names inside a video (hosted elsewhere) has to have the names blurred out?
It's part of naming and shaming.
As i said in another comment:-
Anytime you're playing online, your player name and other details are being broadcast at least to everyone playing with you, in addition everyone playing with you could potentially be capturing the footage to post on sites like Youtube later or be livestreaming it on sites, again like Youtube or Twitch etc.
I've 300+ gaming videos on my channel which potentially show the player names and other details of countless gamers and none of them has every been flagged for removal.
The only difference with this video is that it shows the bad actions of one player, the same actions the currently nearly 60 people left in the guild (sure many of them haven't logged in in a nearly a year, but any could come back at any time), can read in the history of the guild at any time..
(I'm low level in my other three guilds, but i can read all their history.)
When you do something in an online game, it's public and you're warned in several ways on most online services you use.
About the only way i could see Zenimax objecting to this thread (or my video) is IF they punish the player in question, told me by email and instructed me to not discuss whatever actions they'd taken - my footage is no different to a live stream or any other captured online video.
If I were you, I would remove that video from your post if it contains the names of the players you are accusing of theft. It could actually get YOU a forum ban, which would simply be adding insult to injury here. You have already had to deal with the pain of having a guild bank cleared out, you don't want to get a forum ban on top of that.
Zenimax has no control over what people post ON Youtube, but they do have control over what is posted HERE. It is against their Terms of Service to "name and shame". That basically means that if you are accusing someone of something, you cannot post anything that reveals their name (like your video) on these forums.
There's an easy fix to this - ZoS could, with relative ease, allow GMs to "lock" items in the guild bank in the same way you can currently lock items in your own bank or inventory. Locked items can only be removed (or unlocked) by the GM.
bulbousb16_ESO wrote: »Again, no. You GAVE the player the right to do that. It's all back on you.Shame on one player for taking everything in a bank in one morning! :_ .Maybe that's what you expected, but did you tell the players that? Is that explicitly spelled out on your Message-of-the-day?Also, i expected the player to fairly swap their items or just take a handful of items like most normal people do...
Yeah, it's rude, but it's not theft if you're giving them access. It's like the "free" table at work, a spot where everyone puts stuff for others to take, which everyone has access to: yeah, you're a greedy inconsiderate jerk if you take everything, but it's not "theft" since everyone has free access to it and the items are specifically given for anyone to take.Kyle1983b14_ESO wrote: »bulbousb16_ESO wrote: »Again, no. You GAVE the player the right to do that. It's all back on you.Shame on one player for taking everything in a bank in one morning! :_ .Maybe that's what you expected, but did you tell the players that? Is that explicitly spelled out on your Message-of-the-day?Also, i expected the player to fairly swap their items or just take a handful of items like most normal people do...
Even if he had the power to take the stuff from the guild bank, that is just plain greed tbh and should respect the guild no matter if you had access to it or not.
IronCrystal wrote: »Sorry for your guild losses, but did is going to remove the video since names aren't blurred
Out of curiosity, why is the names not being blurred in the video a problem for ZOS? I understand not allowing them to be put inside the forum post itself, but where does it state that even names inside a video (hosted elsewhere) has to have the names blurred out?
It's part of naming and shaming.
As i said in another comment:-
Anytime you're playing online, your player name and other details are being broadcast at least to everyone playing with you, in addition everyone playing with you could potentially be capturing the footage to post on sites like Youtube later or be livestreaming it on sites, again like Youtube or Twitch etc.
I've 300+ gaming videos on my channel which potentially show the player names and other details of countless gamers and none of them has every been flagged for removal.
The only difference with this video is that it shows the bad actions of one player, the same actions the currently nearly 60 people left in the guild (sure many of them haven't logged in in a nearly a year, but any could come back at any time), can read in the history of the guild at any time..
(I'm low level in my other three guilds, but i can read all their history.)
When you do something in an online game, it's public and you're warned in several ways on most online services you use.
About the only way i could see Zenimax objecting to this thread (or my video) is IF they punish the player in question, told me by email and instructed me to not discuss whatever actions they'd taken - my footage is no different to a live stream or any other captured online video.
If I were you, I would remove that video from your post if it contains the names of the players you are accusing of theft. It could actually get YOU a forum ban, which would simply be adding insult to injury here. You have already had to deal with the pain of having a guild bank cleared out, you don't want to get a forum ban on top of that.
Zenimax has no control over what people post ON Youtube, but they do have control over what is posted HERE. It is against their Terms of Service to "name and shame". That basically means that if you are accusing someone of something, you cannot post anything that reveals their name (like your video) on these forums.
But without my video, there's no proof of what they did.
Besides, like i said, every time you play an online game, potentially everybody you're playing with is posting or streaming videos of it.
Various online services, like the Playstation Network or Steam warn you that everything you do online is potential being broadcast - even when you're posting a video through the PS4's sharing feature, it's warns you that your player name and other details will likely be published, everytime you post a video.
Just like walking down the street, whenever you play an online game, you've no guarantee of and shouldn't expect what you do to be private.
Zenimax is hosting an online game, which they're essentially broadcasting around the World - all my video is is a direct in game capture showing, not just one players actions, but my own as well.
I haven't edited or skewed the footage in anyway, so i can't see it's doing anything wrong - it's not like i'm displaying anybodies' actually name, just their handle, which is anonymous any way.
This has probably happened to all of us who run a guild at some point.
I've had it happen 3 times total in 2 guilds.
It's frustrating that we don't have any granular controls, it's either on or off. This needs to change ...
This has probably happened to all of us who run a guild at some point.
I've had it happen 3 times total in 2 guilds.
It's frustrating that we don't have any granular controls, it's either on or off. This needs to change ...
There's no reason for the system to change, it just needs GMs to be more circumspect over who they give withdrawal rights to. It's really that simple.
If you're going on holiday you might want to give a trusted neighbour who you've known for a long time the keys to your house so he can look after the cat while you're away. What you wouldn't want to do is give the keys to the first stranger to walk past your house one morning, yet that is the equivalent to what a lot of GMs are apparently willing to do in ESO. I just don't get it.