Houses should increase bank space?

GeneralFlogger · January 2017

Each size should increase inventory by a certain amount. IE, small 5, medium 10, large 15, manor 20. (Numbers are examples).

lehran · January 2017

I'd rather have houses with their own inventory not accessible in banks, rather than dumping everything into a shared bank. That way I can have armor stands I don't accidentally withdraw from or deconstruct should I forget to lock them or places where I can dump things for "later" so I don't have to scroll through them all the time when looking for other things in my bank.

GeneralFlogger · January 2017

Yes

lehran wrote: »

I'd rather have houses with their own inventory not accessible in banks, rather than dumping everything into a shared bank. That way I can have armor stands I don't accidentally withdraw from or deconstruct should I forget to lock them or places where I can dump things for "later" so I don't have to scroll through them all the time when looking for other things in my bank.

Either way if they give me more space, I will buy more houses.

Gargath · January 2017

No

lehran wrote: »

I'd rather have houses with their own inventory not accessible in banks, rather than dumping everything into a shared bank.

I cannot agree more. That should be a main principle and goal in having own homestead. It should not be related with bank space though.

GeneralFlogger · January 2017

Yes

Gargath wrote: »

lehran wrote: »

I'd rather have houses with their own inventory not accessible in banks, rather than dumping everything into a shared bank.

I cannot agree more. That should be a main principle and goal in having own homestead. It should not be related with bank space though.

So vote no on semantics?

Phica_Lovic · January 2017

We already had this poll. Possibly twice now.

GeneralFlogger · January 2017

Yes

Phica_Lovic wrote: »

We already had this poll. Possibly twice now.

Might not be the first, prob won't be the last

Soella · January 2017

No

I would prefer to have weapon racks/mannequins and interactable chests/wardrobes.

GeneralFlogger · January 2017

Yes

Soella wrote: »

I would prefer to have weapon racks/mannequins and interactable chests/wardrobes.

So it's either a whole new storage system or nothing?

Gargath · January 2017

No

GeneralFlogger wrote: »

Gargath wrote: »

lehran wrote: »

I'd rather have houses with their own inventory not accessible in banks, rather than dumping everything into a shared bank.

I cannot agree more. That should be a main principle and goal in having own homestead. It should not be related with bank space though.

So vote no on symantics?

Voted no as a reply for the question.

skiptomyluau · January 2017

Yes

GeneralFlogger · January 2017

Yes

Gargath wrote: »

GeneralFlogger wrote: »

Gargath wrote: »

lehran wrote: »

I'd rather have houses with their own inventory not accessible in banks, rather than dumping everything into a shared bank.

I cannot agree more. That should be a main principle and goal in having own homestead. It should not be related with bank space though.

So vote no on symantics?

Voted no as a reply for the question.

But you agree that houses should offer storage? Just not *BANK* storage? Semantics, friend.

Rosveen · January 2017

Yes

GeneralFlogger wrote: »

Symantics, friend.

Semantics.

And yeah, yes to more storage space, no to simply increasing bank space.

Pandorii · January 2017

GeneralFlogger wrote: »

Gargath wrote: »

GeneralFlogger wrote: »

Gargath wrote: »

lehran wrote: »

I'd rather have houses with their own inventory not accessible in banks, rather than dumping everything into a shared bank.

I cannot agree more. That should be a main principle and goal in having own homestead. It should not be related with bank space though.

So vote no on symantics?

Voted no as a reply for the question.

But you agree that houses should offer storage? Just not *BANK* storage? Symantics, friend.

Honestly, I couldn't figure out what option to choose either. I do believe that housing should have storage. Ideally, it would have interactive storage to give a home feel, like a pantry or wardrobe that is not associated with our banks, like @lehran mentioned. However, I'd settle for a basic inventory space increase as a result of a ton new crafting materials, recipes, and decorations being added to the game that we have to manage. I hadn't thought about it being tied to how many houses you bought. I think it's a good idea. It incentivizes players to purchase multiple houses, potentially all of the houses. I felt like I would be lying if I said "yes," since how could I want something that I didn't even think about now. I guess your survey is hard to answer in that way. Maybe an "other" option would be better for the people who want some kind of storage, but are not necessarily advocating for the one you are proposing. It's an interesting idea though!

Tabbycat · January 2017

Yes

Think of the poor Khajiit with no place to hide their skooma.

I was thinking more along the lines of dressers, desks, cabinets, crates and barrels and not so much adding slots to banks.

leepalmer95 · January 2017

Housing should let you crafting unique treasure chests or something.

Different tiers of house can have different amount of chests.

1 chest = 10 space

E.g. The apartments can have 1
Small houses 3
Medium 5
Large 7
Manor's 9

Soella · January 2017

No

GeneralFlogger wrote: »

Soella wrote: »

I would prefer to have weapon racks/mannequins and interactable chests/wardrobes.

So it's either a whole new storage system or nothing?

Yes. Because if we will get quick and dirty additional storage we never got proper implementation. I'd rather wait a bit for something good.
But I have the crafter bag, so it is much easier for me, I remember pain when I did not have it....

GeneralFlogger · January 2017

Yes

Rosveen wrote: »

GeneralFlogger wrote: »

Symantics, friend.

Semantics.

And yeah, yes to more storage space, no to simply increasing bank space.

Why does it matter where the extra space is added? The bank is an existing system. Seems logical to simply upgrade it vs creating individualized housing storage for each property you buy.

GeneralFlogger · January 2017

Yes

leepalmer95 wrote: »

Housing should let you crafting unique treasure chests or something.

Different tiers of house can have different amount of chests.

1 chest = 10 space

E.g. The apartments can have 1
Small houses 3
Medium 5
Large 7
Manor's 9

X 40 plus homes, how would you remember where everything is?

Uriel_Nocturne · January 2017

Yes

I voted "Yes", but in truth I'd like to see houses have their own Storage (similar to the amount of storage afforded by the Crafting Bag that we Subscription players get) separate from the Banking system in the game.

Don't relegate Housing Storage to a subscription either. Make so that if you buy a House, you get the Storage, full stop.

But I think that if I can't have that, then I'd like to see bank storage capacity doubled or tripled with the purchase of a House. It only makes sense after all. With something the size of a House, doubling or tripling the available storage doesn't stretch the grounds of credulity in any way.

magnusthorek · January 2017

No

No, not this way, you don't have more space to store your stuff just by throwing them on the floor of your house, do you?

Yes, Homestead should have brought more storage, specially because of the Furniture Crafting, but looks like our inner crafter reproved the containers exam and is only able to create chairs and beds.

leepalmer95 · January 2017

GeneralFlogger wrote: »

leepalmer95 wrote: »

Housing should let you crafting unique treasure chests or something.

Different tiers of house can have different amount of chests.

1 chest = 10 space

E.g. The apartments can have 1
Small houses 3
Medium 5
Large 7
Manor's 9

X 40 plus homes, how would you remember where everything is?

You can only have 1 main home at a time, make it reliant on that.

Tandor · January 2017

No

Yes, but not in the way suggested. A simple increase in everyone's inventory slots to reflect the additional demands of the housing system would be better (not to mention infinitely easier to code) than a variable increase according to whether a player bought one or more houses of varying sizes. The suggestion is frankly unworkable. The principle is sound, however.

billp_ESO · January 2017

I think there is 0% chance that they will add storage to housing, until they figure out how to make money off of it.

Slurg · January 2017

Yes

lehran wrote: »

I'd rather have houses with their own inventory not accessible in banks, rather than dumping everything into a shared bank. That way I can have armor stands I don't accidentally withdraw from or deconstruct should I forget to lock them or places where I can dump things for "later" so I don't have to scroll through them all the time when looking for other things in my bank.

I want separate storage like armor stands and mannequins too - in addition to more bank space. That would require a new storage system though and that would take time to implement. I would like to see the cap lifted on bank space first. If we can have a banker in our house then we can pretend a banker is dual access for our bank and our house storage.

Yes I am a hoarder. I have no shame about this.

Oreyn_Bearclaw · January 2017

Yes

Yes, but you are missing a zero or two on those numbers OP. My horse can carry 60 things, I can carry 140, a manor should be like a 1000 if it cost 3.8 million gold.

I would be totally shocked if this doesnt get changed in the future. I promise you will be able to purchase or perhaps craft storage racks at some point.

Storage is an interesting thing in an MMO. Too much and it actually hurts the economy because people just hoard. The difference in ESO is that their are so many traits and so much bound crap that it gets overwhelming. I would like to see some sort of bound equipment storage added in one way or another. I think it would also be cool if you could stack similar items with different traits in some way. I have almost 200 monster sets at the moment. I thin them out every time that toon's inventory gets full. I just hate to destroy a trait that might not be useful now, but will be OP next patch.

Danikat · January 2017

I agree with the people saying extra bank space doesn't really solve the issue - a big part of the appeal of houses with storage is to be able to store/display your items IN your house, not simply to have more storage space.

Rev Rielle · January 2017

No

There is no logical reason why they should increase bank space.
I think they should have their own storage space, with some unique qualities/functions relating to that storage.
Just what those unique qualities might be though I'm unsure of.

Julianos · January 2017

Yes

I wont buy any house if there is no storage feature

Especially nowadays lots of drop sets i need tons of space i have 9 chars

I have no idea why people love to waste their gold for literally useless stuff.

ANGEL_BtVS · January 2017

Yes

lehran wrote: »

I'd rather have houses with their own inventory not accessible in banks, rather than dumping everything into a shared bank. That way I can have armor stands I don't accidentally withdraw from or deconstruct should I forget to lock them or places where I can dump things for "later" so I don't have to scroll through them all the time when looking for other things in my bank.

Interesting as I feel the exact opposite as you. I have zero interest in managing multiple sets of inventory all in different locations that need to be traveled to in order to access. No thanks. Just give me increased bank size where I can tap a banker anywhere I am located. They would need to refine the bank UI though, a separate tab for furniture (similar to the crafting bag tab) would be a start, maybe one for trophies/maps/motifs, etc.. Also, I'm for mannequins for displaying armor sets for aesthetics, but not for a chest to just dump stuff in and forget.

GeneralFlogger · January 2017

Yes

ANGEL_BtVS wrote: »

lehran wrote: »

I'd rather have houses with their own inventory not accessible in banks, rather than dumping everything into a shared bank. That way I can have armor stands I don't accidentally withdraw from or deconstruct should I forget to lock them or places where I can dump things for "later" so I don't have to scroll through them all the time when looking for other things in my bank.

Interesting as I feel the exact opposite as you. I have zero interest in managing multiple sets of inventory all in different locations that need to be traveled to in order to access. No thanks. Just give me increased bank size where I can tap a banker anywhere I am located. They would need to refine the bank UI though, a separate tab for furniture (similar to the crafting bag tab) would be a start, maybe one for trophies/maps/motifs, etc.. Also, I'm for mannequins for displaying armor sets for aesthetics, but not for a chest to just dump stuff in and forget.

I completely agree, and it's not like I'm asking people to choose between things like mannequins/weapon racks and functionality. That is decorative in nature and should be handled separately. What I am asking about is additional storage as more bang for your buck when shelling out 25+ mil for every house. Bank space seems the most convenient method.

When you upgrade your horse storage you get inventory upgrade. You don't have 10 mounts with 60 storage space each.

The Elder Scrolls Online

Houses should increase bank space?

Houses should increase bank space? 197 votes