Houses should increase bank space?

akl77

Yes

Or at least let us buy bank space with in game gold. I'm already at maximum bank space and need more for house crafting and decor.

GeneralFlogger

Yes

Rev Rielle wrote: »

There is no logical reason why they should increase bank space.
I think they should have their own storage space, with some unique qualities/functions relating to that storage.
Just what those unique qualities might be though I'm unsure of.

By your logic each mount you own would have it's own inventory by which you would have to switch between them to get to your gear.

What I'm suggesting is, in fact, completely logical and already implemented with the mount storage upgrade.

GeneralFlogger

Yes

Basically outside of SEMANTICS , we all pretty much agree housing should increase storage in some meaningful way. ZoS?

GeneralFlogger

Yes

leepalmer95 wrote: »

GeneralFlogger wrote: »

leepalmer95 wrote: »

Housing should let you crafting unique treasure chests or something.

Different tiers of house can have different amount of chests.

1 chest = 10 space

E.g. The apartments can have 1
Small houses 3
Medium 5
Large 7
Manor's 9

X 40 plus homes, how would you remember where everything is?

You can only have 1 main home at a time, make it reliant on that.

So comparing that to how mount carry capacity works.... should it be 60 additional inventory spaces for each mount you own?

You would trade the current system for not being able to access things you put on different mounts w/o switching to them constantly?

STEVIL

No

Voted No just because yes is too blanket.

I think definitely housing should allow you to have furniture that allows additional storage - not necessarily bank space - as in you go to the house and access storage to retrieve item, not just go to Rawlkha bank and pick up stuff from your houser in shadowfen.

its been suggested storage is coming in future updates so... that will be good.

But IMO a shift to where "bank" was more for "quick access stuff need on hand " and housing was for long term more bulk storage - that would be a decent direction.

So "no" to just making housing storage an expansion of bank slots - we have tons of ways to get that now - all just meh.

I prefer to have new additions be new not just more of the old.

Ourorboros

Yes

GeneralFlogger wrote: »

Each size should increase inventory by a certain amount. IE, small 5, medium 10, large 15, manor 20. (Numbers are examples).

Don't worry, all the options you want for houses will eventually be available in the crown store.

dodgehopper_ESO

Yes

lehran wrote: »

I'd rather have houses with their own inventory not accessible in banks, rather than dumping everything into a shared bank. That way I can have armor stands I don't accidentally withdraw from or deconstruct should I forget to lock them or places where I can dump things for "later" so I don't have to scroll through them all the time when looking for other things in my bank.

Great idea.

NewBlacksmurf

No

No

Housing shouldn't. Housing should have added a new inventory section like a crafting bag for any and all housing related recipes, writ, etc

Inventory and bank should be increased as a base game update excluding any dlc or new features.

dodgehopper_ESO

Yes

ANGEL_BtVS wrote: »

lehran wrote: »

I'd rather have houses with their own inventory not accessible in banks, rather than dumping everything into a shared bank. That way I can have armor stands I don't accidentally withdraw from or deconstruct should I forget to lock them or places where I can dump things for "later" so I don't have to scroll through them all the time when looking for other things in my bank.

Interesting as I feel the exact opposite as you. I have zero interest in managing multiple sets of inventory all in different locations that need to be traveled to in order to access. No thanks. Just give me increased bank size where I can tap a banker anywhere I am located. They would need to refine the bank UI though, a separate tab for furniture (similar to the crafting bag tab) would be a start, maybe one for trophies/maps/motifs, etc.. Also, I'm for mannequins for displaying armor sets for aesthetics, but not for a chest to just dump stuff in and forget.

The reason I find it compelling to have multiple sets of banks as described, is that it would allow you store different kinds of equipment in different locations. This would in turn make it easy to organize your bank, as opposed to the sloppy mess that exists now. In standalone TES games, particularly Skyrim, I use to use different houses in this way also. I'd have my provisioning and alchemy house, my armor and weapon crafting house. I'd load up certain mannequins with armor styles for different occasions and I knew exactly where to go to get that equipment.

Glurin

I'm a little bit conflicted on this one. Housing should have form of storage capability, and probably will at some point in the future, but just increasing your bank space seems like an ugly quick fix. It would be nice to have the extra storage, sure, but as with most temporary solutions, ugly quick fixes have a tendency to never go away so that a proper solution can be implemented.

Cazic

Yes

Don't worry, they will add storage expansion options later, most likely for crowns. With any luck there will be some included with ESO plus.

STEVIL

No

Ourorboros wrote: »

GeneralFlogger wrote: »

Each size should increase inventory by a certain amount. IE, small 5, medium 10, large 15, manor 20. (Numbers are examples).

Don't worry, all the options you want for houses will eventually be available in the crown store.

Great to know.

Nerouyn

No

billp_ESO wrote: »

I think there is 0% chance that they will add storage to housing, until they figure out how to make money off of it.

Clone the crafting bag system but with a few differences.

Each house has its own inventory, only accessible from that house.

Inventory isn't limitless. Make it 400 or 800 as baseline for each material type. That can be expanded through crown store purchased upgrades and those upgrades are applied to a single house. [this should be safe assuming there's no way to lose / sell / delete a house you own]

Ditto for the bank system, maybe with 100 slots baseline storage.

Easy.

What's difficult is that the crafting bag is currently the major advantage to subscribing. Literally any kind of storage attached to housing potentially undermines that. So it's not so much a matter of how to make money from housing storage, it's how to add housing storage without losing subscriptions.

xKRAIZEEMANx

Yes

Shared bank space, or access to bank space outside of the assistant would be acceptable, bare minimum. Better than nothing...

I'd love to have chests and dressers and all the stuff I had in Skyrim. I had everything in specific containers and well organized....And I agree with others, mannequins and armor/weapon stands. These things I would prefer above all else.

Yolokin_Swagonborn

Yes

Phica_Lovic wrote: »

We already had this poll. Possibly twice now.

Doesn't matter. We should keep having this poll until ZOS realizes that people buy houses TO PUT THEIR BELONGINGS INSIDE.

Thanks to the terrible BOP change to dungeons, everyone is in inventory hell right now. Storage has always been a part of housing in TES games. Time for ZOS to act more like Bethesda and less like Micro$oft.

TheShadowScout

Yes

Yes, I agree that housing should come with an increase to storage space.

I am not so set on how that should be handled.

Increased bank space certainly would be the most easy thing to do there. Be it with just a general bank space increase, or with a second "housing storage" that works just like the bank, but can be accessed from a closet in your housing - either is fine. Personally I'd prefer the latter for more immersion, even tho it would be a bit more of a hassle to switch things back and forth...

And I agree that with how things are going, we -definitely- need more banking space. So much stuff to juggle... especially when you keep trying to get item sets for alts together...

GeneralFlogger

Yes

STEVIL wrote: »

Voted No just because yes is too blanket.

I think definitely housing should allow you to have furniture that allows additional storage - not necessarily bank space - as in you go to the house and access storage to retrieve item, not just go to Rawlkha bank and pick up stuff from your houser in shadowfen.

its been suggested storage is coming in future updates so... that will be good.

But IMO a shift to where "bank" was more for "quick access stuff need on hand " and housing was for long term more bulk storage - that would be a decent direction.

So "no" to just making housing storage an expansion of bank slots - we have tons of ways to get that now - all just meh.

I prefer to have new additions be new not just more of the old.

DEFINITELY not too blanket at all as there is always a need for end game players to have things "on hand" ESO online is an MMO, always has been always will be.

And what for those people who will buy multiple houses? (perhaps yourself?) You want to go to 10 plus travel points (40+?) to access a few stacks of random gear or provisions, +/-100 pieces per house? How in the WORLD is that better than the banking system?

Seems slow and inefficient to me, the banking system works and, as I am presenting it, would work the same as the bonus to YOUR inventory that you get from YOUR mount... Oh yeah, your mount doesn't limit itself to your gear right? You wouldn't want to have to change mounts every time you need one of the SIXTY items it holds, AM I RIGHT?

Messy1

Yes

This is by FAR the easiest solution (I think) for demands for storage with housing.

Just make bank space expandable by 40-60 items and have it upgraded by type of house you own + storage furniture you place in it.

Like the OP posted:
ex) Small house gets you 5 extra storage then if you place a crafted "antique chest" you get another 5.
ex) Manor gets you 20 extra storage then if you place a crafted "ornate gidled chest" another extra 20

Also you should be able to upgrade your house to have access to your bank in the house

This system is soooo simple and ZOS could still give players the option of getting space upgrades with crowns, which of course the greedy bas*ta*r^ds will do . . .

GeneralFlogger

Yes

Messy1 wrote: »

This is by FAR the easiest solution (I think) for demands for storage with housing.

Just make bank space expandable by 40-60 items and have it upgraded by type of house you own + storage furniture you place in it.

Like the OP posted:
ex) Small house gets you 5 extra storage then if you place a crafted "antique chest" you get another 5.
ex) Manor gets you 20 extra storage then if you place a crafted "ornate gidled chest" another extra 20

Also you should be able to upgrade your house to have access to your bank in the house

This system is soooo simple and ZOS could still give players the option of getting space upgrades with crowns, which of course the greedy bas*ta*r^ds will do . . .

Wouldn't care if they did charge extra, I want extra storage!

GeneralFlogger

Yes

Ourorboros wrote: »

GeneralFlogger wrote: »

Each size should increase inventory by a certain amount. IE, small 5, medium 10, large 15, manor 20. (Numbers are examples).

Don't worry, all the options you want for houses will eventually be available in the crown store.

Would and Will buy when available. Hopefully included at launch however...

Rev Rielle

No

GeneralFlogger wrote: »

Rev Rielle wrote: »

There is no logical reason why they should increase bank space.
I think they should have their own storage space, with some unique qualities/functions relating to that storage.
Just what those unique qualities might be though I'm unsure of.

By your logic each mount you own would have it's own inventory by which you would have to switch between them to get to your gear.

What I'm suggesting is, in fact, completely logical and already implemented with the mount storage upgrade.

No, I don't agree. I think that's a poor analogy. Classically a horse follows us around. To that end the adaptation of it expanding our character inventory isn't that much of a leap.

Additionally, housing storage when it comes (and they've said it likely will in future, so I'm not entirely sure why everyone's complaining in the first place) provides a reason to go and use/interact with your home.

Just because logic is dismissed in one facet/mechanism does not mean it should be let go of altogether.

JWKe

Yes

I say yes to anything that gives me more.

GeneralFlogger

Yes

Rev Rielle wrote: »

GeneralFlogger wrote: »

Rev Rielle wrote: »

There is no logical reason why they should increase bank space.
I think they should have their own storage space, with some unique qualities/functions relating to that storage.
Just what those unique qualities might be though I'm unsure of.

By your logic each mount you own would have it's own inventory by which you would have to switch between them to get to your gear.

What I'm suggesting is, in fact, completely logical and already implemented with the mount storage upgrade.

No, I don't agree. I think that's a poor analogy. Classically a horse follows us around. To that end the adaptation of it expanding our character inventory isn't that much of a leap.

Additionally, housing storage when it comes (and they've said it likely will in future, so I'm not entirely sure why everyone's complaining in the first place) provides a reason to go and use/interact with your home.

Just because logic is dismissed in one facet/mechanism does not mean it should be let go of altogether.

It's not a poor analogy. It would be a poor decision for ZOS to make housing storage as inconvenient as you are suggesting.

johu31

Yes

They should, but they already said not this time. Perhaps next patch

Drazhar14

Yes

In the single player games the only reason I cared for houses was to store my stuff and have a free bed for the well rested bonus. I'm not really interested in ESO's housing, so if they made each house you own increase bank space by a tiny bit I'd have incentive.

I'd also support a house specific storage chest separate from the bank or a display rack for gear sets I'm hanging on to, which would be awesome to both free up inventory space and have a cool display.

Bombashaman

Yes

Phica_Lovic wrote: »

We already had this poll. Possibly twice now.

I like polls. Keep 'em coming.

phileunderx2

Yes

We wants moar spaceeeee !!!!

Nestor

The whole idea of accidentally deconning something is gone with item locking. So, no reason to separate out Bag Space, as that would just have me running around the world trying to figure out where something was stored. I did enough of that in Oblivion and Skyrim. Just add to Bank Space, as homes are shared across characters so should additional storage from the houses.

flguy147ub17_ESO

Yes

Would be cool to have like chests, cabinets, etc for different types of things. Like Heavy armor, light armor, jewelry, misc, treasure maps, monster sets, etc. Even be able to label the name of the storage chests and cabinets too. Like some of the modded homes in skyrim have.

notimetocare

No

Vanity only. No important function should exist. Extra storage forces people to participate