Bryanonymous wrote: »Because they're a scam.
There is no scam without a deceit.
Bryanonymous wrote: »Because they're a scam.
There is no scam without a deceit.
I believe the deceit in this case is not giving the odds.
Bouldercleave wrote: »Bryanonymous wrote: »I could give so many answers, but a scam is a scam... Calling it like I see it. Plus, I already have some examples in a previous post. In what way does playing corporate white knight help you? And please... saying the profits from these helps keep the game going is hearsay speculation at most. That is one of the most played out assumptions in this community. Guess all those subs dried out? Btw, have you seen any estimates of ZoS profits from game sales, or are you just assuming they're broke to rationalize why they need to rip people off?In what way does that affect you besides making the game better in the long run?
"ripping people off" implies misleading information or force. They have done neither one of those. The crates are working EXACTLY as they presented them and no one is forcing you to spend money on them.
It is NOT a scam, and it is not a rip off. It is simply a matter of if you see value in them vs the cost, then you buy into them.
And NO I have not partaken in the crates as I have no desire to. I personally don't see the value vs risk.
Bouldercleave wrote: »Bryanonymous wrote: »Because they're a scam.
There is no scam without a deceit.
I believe the deceit in this case is not giving the odds.
That is not deceit. It may be a bit opaque, but it hardly constitutes deceit.
Trust me, if you think these things are a scam, your life is going to be one giant crap sandwich.
Bryanonymous wrote: »Because they're a scam.
There is no scam without a deceit.
I believe the deceit in this case is not giving the odds.
Bryanonymous wrote: »Because they're a scam.
There is no scam without a deceit.
I believe the deceit in this case is not giving the odds.
Bryanonymous wrote: »And the rest of us have the right to say it's a scam.
"Worth" is not dependant on ZOS price tag but to how valuable they really are. Poisons for example have no worth at all since these are extremely easy to get. Same goes for pointless werewolf / vampire bites... all free and mostly easy to acquire yet they cost like 1k crowns.
Publius_Scipio wrote: »I have nothing against direct purchases. I have nothing against crown crates. ZOS can include whatever "benefit" it sees fit into its product, whether you personally believe there is no benefit to anyone but ZOS itself. You make the decision to whether or not you want to consume their product.
I absolutely will defend their right to be "stupid", smart, goofy, funny, upside down, sideways, etc etc. It is the very right they have that should be defended. The same right we all have, individuals and businesses. And ZOS should absolutely not bend to the will and logic you believe in unless they themselves want to change course.
Deceiving means making someone believe something is true when in fact it is not.
Simply not giving any information is not a deceit, unless the deceiver knows the deceived already falsely believes something, and withholds information that would make the deceived know the truth.
de·ceit
dəˈsēt/
noun
the action or practice of deceiving someone by concealing or misrepresenting the truth.
I think not publishing drop rates absolutely qualifies as concealing the truth, YMMV.
Bryanonymous wrote: »Because they're a scam.
There is no scam without a deceit.
I believe the deceit in this case is not giving the odds.
Deceiving means making someone believe something is true when in fact it is not.
Simply not giving any information is not a deceit, unless the deceiver knows the deceived already falsely believes something, and withholds information that would make the deceived know the truth.
Crown Crates are purchased through the Crown Store, and contain a randomized selection of useful consumables and collectibles that are valued more than the price of a single crate.
"Worth" is not dependant on ZOS price tag but to how valuable they really are. Poisons for example have no worth at all since these are extremely easy to get. Same goes for pointless werewolf / vampire bites... all free and mostly easy to acquire yet they cost like 1k crowns.Publius_Scipio wrote: »I have nothing against direct purchases. I have nothing against crown crates. ZOS can include whatever "benefit" it sees fit into its product, whether you personally believe there is no benefit to anyone but ZOS itself. You make the decision to whether or not you want to consume their product.
I absolutely will defend their right to be "stupid", smart, goofy, funny, upside down, sideways, etc etc. It is the very right they have that should be defended. The same right we all have, individuals and businesses. And ZOS should absolutely not bend to the will and logic you believe in unless they themselves want to change course.
If you think a cookie should cost as much as car then I guess there is nothing much I can argue with. Why would anyone that is actually interested in buying said cookie choose the price much higher? It seems you don't even use the crown store which makes this very easy. I can't fathom any other explanation and you don't need to answer. You just lost me completely with this "logic".
Why would anyone that is actually interested in buying said cookie choose the price much higher?
Bryanonymous wrote: »Bouldercleave wrote: »Bryanonymous wrote: »I could give so many answers, but a scam is a scam... Calling it like I see it. Plus, I already have some examples in a previous post. In what way does playing corporate white knight help you? And please... saying the profits from these helps keep the game going is hearsay speculation at most. That is one of the most played out assumptions in this community. Guess all those subs dried out? Btw, have you seen any estimates of ZoS profits from game sales, or are you just assuming they're broke to rationalize why they need to rip people off?In what way does that affect you besides making the game better in the long run?
"ripping people off" implies misleading information or force. They have done neither one of those. The crates are working EXACTLY as they presented them and no one is forcing you to spend money on them.
It is NOT a scam, and it is not a rip off. It is simply a matter of if you see value in them vs the cost, then you buy into them.
And NO I have not partaken in the crates as I have no desire to. I personally don't see the value vs risk.
Without releasing information about the drop rates and the algorithms they are misleading people indeed. So how about you do some research and stop playing the hero. This is sleezy business and I have every right to voice my opinions.
It's a scam. A rip off. They are being deceiptful. The entire gimmick is a waste of money. And it's deteriorating the integrity of a good game by cheapening it to shallow content and shady gimmicks.
You're not going to silence me or anyone else who wants to make it very clear that this kind of business is disgusting. And the consent that the white knights are giving is suspiciously defensive as well.
Deceiving means making someone believe something is true when in fact it is not.
Simply not giving any information is not a deceit, unless the deceiver knows the deceived already falsely believes something, and withholds information that would make the deceived know the truth.
I'll just leave this here in case you skimmed over it the first time.de·ceit
dəˈsēt/
noun
the action or practice of deceiving someone by concealing or misrepresenting the truth.
I think not publishing drop rates absolutely qualifies as concealing the truth, YMMV.
Deceiving means making someone believe something is true when in fact it is not.
Simply not giving any information is not a deceit, unless the deceiver knows the deceived already falsely believes something, and withholds information that would make the deceived know the truth.
I'll just leave this here in case you skimmed over it the first time.de·ceit
dəˈsēt/
noun
the action or practice of deceiving someone by concealing or misrepresenting the truth.
I think not publishing drop rates absolutely qualifies as concealing the truth, YMMV.
I did not skim over it. That definition is wrong/incomplete.
Publius_Scipio wrote: »
"Worth" is not dependant on ZOS price tag but to how valuable they really are. Poisons for example have no worth at all since these are extremely easy to get. Same goes for pointless werewolf / vampire bites... all free and mostly easy to acquire yet they cost like 1k crowns.Publius_Scipio wrote: »I have nothing against direct purchases. I have nothing against crown crates. ZOS can include whatever "benefit" it sees fit into its product, whether you personally believe there is no benefit to anyone but ZOS itself. You make the decision to whether or not you want to consume their product.
I absolutely will defend their right to be "stupid", smart, goofy, funny, upside down, sideways, etc etc. It is the very right they have that should be defended. The same right we all have, individuals and businesses. And ZOS should absolutely not bend to the will and logic you believe in unless they themselves want to change course.
If you think a cookie should cost as much as car then I guess there is nothing much I can argue with. Why would anyone that is actually interested in buying said cookie choose the price much higher? It seems you don't even use the crown store which makes this very easy. I can't fathom any other explanation and you don't need to answer. You just lost me completely with this "logic".
Let me try to get something through to you. It's called freedoms. F R E E D O M!
Bryanonymous wrote: »You think you're clever dictating to us what a free market is, but in a free market, there is also free speech to call a scam a scam. None of us need any 2bit advice on a corporations rights. We already know they pay for far more of them than the rest of us. Our written protest against what we don't like is not only limited to what they allow, but not made any easier with white knights constantly throwing pointless irrelevant details at us. These boxes are a total rip off and it seems there was no reason for the game to sink this low. ESO has been doing so well without this crap, the only excuse is such corporate greed that they risk long term sustainability for a short term cash grab. Basically a middle finger to all of us.
Deceiving means making someone believe something is true when in fact it is not.
Simply not giving any information is not a deceit, unless the deceiver knows the deceived already falsely believes something, and withholds information that would make the deceived know the truth.
I'll just leave this here in case you skimmed over it the first time.de·ceit
dəˈsēt/
noun
the action or practice of deceiving someone by concealing or misrepresenting the truth.
I think not publishing drop rates absolutely qualifies as concealing the truth, YMMV.
I did not skim over it. That definition is wrong/incomplete.
Wow, I did not know that! You should really call up the Oxford English Dictionary and set them straight.
Definition of deceive: to cause to accept as true or valid what is false or invalid
Publius_Scipio wrote: »
"Worth" is not dependant on ZOS price tag but to how valuable they really are. Poisons for example have no worth at all since these are extremely easy to get. Same goes for pointless werewolf / vampire bites... all free and mostly easy to acquire yet they cost like 1k crowns.Publius_Scipio wrote: »I have nothing against direct purchases. I have nothing against crown crates. ZOS can include whatever "benefit" it sees fit into its product, whether you personally believe there is no benefit to anyone but ZOS itself. You make the decision to whether or not you want to consume their product.
I absolutely will defend their right to be "stupid", smart, goofy, funny, upside down, sideways, etc etc. It is the very right they have that should be defended. The same right we all have, individuals and businesses. And ZOS should absolutely not bend to the will and logic you believe in unless they themselves want to change course.
If you think a cookie should cost as much as car then I guess there is nothing much I can argue with. Why would anyone that is actually interested in buying said cookie choose the price much higher? It seems you don't even use the crown store which makes this very easy. I can't fathom any other explanation and you don't need to answer. You just lost me completely with this "logic".
Let me try to get something through to you. It's called freedoms. F R E E D O M!
You're completely missing the point. You have "freedom" as well. The freedom to oppose this nonsense yet you defend the developers and their ridiculous thieving. God, "patriots" are annoying.
starlizard70ub17_ESO wrote: »Bryanonymous wrote: »You think you're clever dictating to us what a free market is, but in a free market, there is also free speech to call a scam a scam. None of us need any 2bit advice on a corporations rights. We already know they pay for far more of them than the rest of us. Our written protest against what we don't like is not only limited to what they allow, but not made any easier with white knights constantly throwing pointless irrelevant details at us. These boxes are a total rip off and it seems there was no reason for the game to sink this low. ESO has been doing so well without this crap, the only excuse is such corporate greed that they risk long term sustainability for a short term cash grab. Basically a middle finger to all of us.
If you're so upset at ZOS's " deceitfulness" in regards to Crown Crates, why don't you just cancel your account and quit right now? And no, I don't want your stuff. Being this upset about a game is not healthy, just walk away.
Deceiving means making someone believe something is true when in fact it is not.
Simply not giving any information is not a deceit, unless the deceiver knows the deceived already falsely believes something, and withholds information that would make the deceived know the truth.
I'll just leave this here in case you skimmed over it the first time.de·ceit
dəˈsēt/
noun
the action or practice of deceiving someone by concealing or misrepresenting the truth.
I think not publishing drop rates absolutely qualifies as concealing the truth, YMMV.
I did not skim over it. That definition is wrong/incomplete.
Wow, I did not know that! You should really call up the Oxford English Dictionary and set them straight.
Someone certainly should, because using a word in the definition of the same word is a recursive nonsense. I mean, just read it. "Deceit is deceiving". Gee, wouldn't have guessed that one.
/rollseyes
(not to mention it is also wrong for the reason i listed in post #350)
You guys are making a mountain out of a molehill. These are Team Fortress crates but instead of buying keys, they cut out the middleman and just sell you the crates.
If you can't cut it, don't buy it. That simple. Being angry because you aren't getting exactly what you want upfront is just being silly.
Deceiving means making someone believe something is true when in fact it is not.
Simply not giving any information is not a deceit, unless the deceiver knows the deceived already falsely believes something, and withholds information that would make the deceived know the truth.
I'll just leave this here in case you skimmed over it the first time.de·ceit
dəˈsēt/
noun
the action or practice of deceiving someone by concealing or misrepresenting the truth.
I think not publishing drop rates absolutely qualifies as concealing the truth, YMMV.
I did not skim over it. That definition is wrong/incomplete.
Wow, I did not know that! You should really call up the Oxford English Dictionary and set them straight.
Someone certainly should, because using a word in the definition of the same word is a recursive nonsense. I mean, just read it. "Deceit is deceiving". Gee, wouldn't have guessed that one.
/rollseyes
(not to mention it is also wrong for the reason i listed in post #350)
Mmmmkay... your reasoning in #350 is pretty thin. Of course failing to shout every detail of your life at every stranger you pass is not deceitful. Entering into an exchange of money for services when the vendor deliberately conceals the details of the transaction however, well that seems to fit the definition pretty well.
Bryanonymous wrote: »starlizard70ub17_ESO wrote: »Bryanonymous wrote: »You think you're clever dictating to us what a free market is, but in a free market, there is also free speech to call a scam a scam. None of us need any 2bit advice on a corporations rights. We already know they pay for far more of them than the rest of us. Our written protest against what we don't like is not only limited to what they allow, but not made any easier with white knights constantly throwing pointless irrelevant details at us. These boxes are a total rip off and it seems there was no reason for the game to sink this low. ESO has been doing so well without this crap, the only excuse is such corporate greed that they risk long term sustainability for a short term cash grab. Basically a middle finger to all of us.
If you're so upset at ZOS's " deceitfulness" in regards to Crown Crates, why don't you just cancel your account and quit right now? And no, I don't want your stuff. Being this upset about a game is not healthy, just walk away.
Because I don't want to do that. What I want to do is play this game and also write my objections to this scam on this thread, tyvm. Why point it out? Because without the freedom to point out what's lousy, things might never get better.
Deceiving means making someone believe something is true when in fact it is not.
Simply not giving any information is not a deceit, unless the deceiver knows the deceived already falsely believes something, and withholds information that would make the deceived know the truth.
I'll just leave this here in case you skimmed over it the first time.de·ceit
dəˈsēt/
noun
the action or practice of deceiving someone by concealing or misrepresenting the truth.
I think not publishing drop rates absolutely qualifies as concealing the truth, YMMV.
I did not skim over it. That definition is wrong/incomplete.
Wow, I did not know that! You should really call up the Oxford English Dictionary and set them straight.
Someone certainly should, because using a word in the definition of the same word is a recursive nonsense. I mean, just read it. "Deceit is deceiving". Gee, wouldn't have guessed that one.
/rollseyes
(not to mention it is also wrong for the reason i listed in post #350)
Mmmmkay... your reasoning in #350 is pretty thin. Of course failing to shout every detail of your life at every stranger you pass is not deceitful. Entering into an exchange of money for services when the vendor deliberately conceals the details of the transaction however, well that seems to fit the definition pretty well.
Actually no, it does not, unless the vendor deliberately misleads the client, either by directly confusing the client, or by not correcting a false assumption of the client (that the vendor is aware of):
"to cause to accept as true or valid what is false or invalid"