FLuFFyxMuFFiN wrote: »Jimbullbee85 wrote: »FLuFFyxMuFFiN wrote: »dont tell me this, please =(FLuFFyxMuFFiN wrote: »Most likely never
Its the sad truth. They don't want level 3 people running around with Stormproof or Flawless Conqueror
Yet they allow them to have maxed out champion points..... hmmmm
What is 561 CP if you don't know how to play the character? If you do know how to play the character then you should have no problem earning the achievements again.
Like waiting 20 hours for bosses to spawn in cyrodiil and collecting 100 plunder skulls? Or perhaps earning 1 000 000 gold by selling stolen goods? No thanks. Once should be enough. Doing all achievements 14 times would take more than 1 life time, even if you were playing 24/7.
BlanketFort wrote: »Achievements for clearing difficult content with title rewards should not be account-wide.
Why not? you can already use skins and colors achieved form achievement on your lvl 3 noob. Why not to share the achievement and titles too? It just tells you are not a total noob even though you are plaing with lvl 3 character.BlanketFort wrote: »Achievements for clearing difficult content with title rewards should not be account-wide.
Because they show your mastery of playing a certain class/build. The only problem I have with this is why shouldn't be account-wide if I have two magicka sorcs on my account.
The game is already alt friendly. What you are asking for is a hand out. Guild and pvp skill lines need to be earned per character. Achievements are fine the way they are. You can already use the dyes and costumes on all characters, only thing missing is the titles. You want the title on your alt, go earn it!
Giles.floydub17_ESO wrote: »
I had tagged you because if your petty name calling and what was most of that previous post attempting to belittle me kinda like you just tried again. Name calling is truly petty Pathetic behavior.
Second, I specifically addressed in the post you are referring to about the problems of maiming some achieve te account wide. Much of the small population who cares about this subject would not be happy with what Zos considers an account wide achievement.
People that are actually interested in this will not be happy. People who worked hard to get more worthwhile achievements on multiple characters will get bent it that achievement becomes account wide.
I respect your all into the achievements to the degree you are. Sorry you feel bad playing on a newer alt. That's cool, but I still recommend Zos say no since I doubt you'll be happy unless they permit sharing everything.
BTW, I don't die armor for any character I don't play. I pretty much have all the achievements I've gotten on all characters. So again, the name calling, very much not appropriate.
Have a good day.
@Giles.floydub17_ESO
You answered 0 of my questions. Why would adding more stuff to the game be bad for anyone?
People who won't be happy? you mean the ones that are perfectly happy with account-wide mounts, pets, etc? They will be perfectly happy with achievements too, once that is introduced.
Worthwhile achievements are done fast. I am talking about GRIND. Those are not worthwhile achievements. It doesn't matter which character you used to fish.
Yes, the name calling is appropriate. because where were you, when they added new levels of undaunted skill line and screwed over everyone who already earned all achievements and could only level those skill lines by pledges? Where was the majority of people who "won't be happy" because they will get "bent"? Oh right, creating threads about making VMA loot tradeable or adding the token system, to "bend" those who farmed for years, 500 runs or something.
So yeah , that's pretty hypocrite to only welcome changes if they improve your particular part of the game, even though that bends others, but not welcome them if they add fun to others. How would that even "bend" them? They will still have their achievements on multiple characters. We are talking about adding a counter on top of that, not to just have 1 achievements table for an account,no. You will still know if 1 particular character got an achievement.
A character who a player hasn't completed vma with will not have a Stormproof title. Where did this idea come from?
And yes, it is hypocrite. You want to see achievements of your characters? Go ahead, no one is asking to take that away from you. We are asking to help us have fun and not make us feel bad if we're playing another character that RNG will give those characters what our mains still don't have.
Knootewoot wrote: »It would not work. then your new character would have the achievement of all skyshards for example. And then it is hard to track which ones you missed. Same for certain quests.
Knootewoot wrote: »It would not work. then your new character would have the achievement of all skyshards for example. And then it is hard to track which ones you missed. Same for certain quests.
Giles.floydub17_ESO wrote: »
Answering this question and the bigger questions that was a petty attempt to derail the conversations.
For everyone who wants the Slaughters achievement shared account wide there will be one who wants Stormproof and Mageslayer an account wide achievement. Everyone does not have the same idea of how something like this should pan out.
Giles.floydub17_ESO wrote: »It is also human nature to want more. So in the end, it is easier, and better, for Zos to just move past this subject and not make any changes. This is why Zos will not make any changes this thread is requesting. This is what your next reply should focus on.
Oh no, if character aren't just player's tools, then be consistent.Giles.floydub17_ESO wrote: »As for your question to who would get upset because some some achievements are now account wide? Consider that question answered properly, if it was not clear before. I do see your confusion, but vMA weapons are not an achievement and is a wholly separate topic.
Giles.floydub17_ESO wrote: »This was the rhetorical question, I assume. I have no concerns about seeing all my achievements on each character. I am fully aware of what I have accomplished on a character, at least of achievements I am concerned with. I also do not feel bad when playing a character I have not accomplished a certain task on because. I will earn it on that character, or not.
Probably a matter of, if someone is that much of a completionist, that they must have every achievement, they should probably only have one character.
Thank you for not resorting to name calling. Much better.
Enjoy the game.
Knootewoot wrote: »It would not work. then your new character would have the achievement of all skyshards for example. And then it is hard to track which ones you missed. Same for certain quests.
I am neutral about achievements being account wide though. Achievements don't mean squat to me. I never understood why people are obsessed with achievements. Just play the game.
You're welcome to keep playing WoW to meet your needs of having a WoW game experience. Or you can appreciate ESO for what it it, and how it chooses to be different from other games.
MasterSpatula wrote: »When I first started playing, I didn't like this, too. But it really has grown on me. It allows me to feel the sense of accomplishment associated with each character separately.
Of course, that was before Trophies were bound to character.