I love seeing the NB's are squishy posts lol people are clueless
Yeh, I never unserstand that too. Restances from their spammable, best cc in the game which can be used effectively for defence, cloak (albeit unreliable) which again gives resistances and even shade (yes, even on a stamblade).
I like how every one is trying to say I'm just upset that I got ganked. I don't care if I die getting ganked. I'm not saying make it weaker by any means. Dawnbreaker is getting an increase and it does half the stuff. It hits more than one person l2p right?
Dragon leap can be dodge and it's over double the cost and only knocks back. I want Dragon leap to cost 30 ult which is fair because we don't get a passive for easy 20 ult.
BruhItsOver9000 wrote: »Isellskooma wrote: »Nightblades aren't squishy.BruhItsOver9000 wrote: »Once they nerf nightblades i quit. We nightblades are squishy, you nerf our burst, the class will die.
Troll or just a bad dps who can't deal decent damage against a nightblade? I wear 5 impen and have 47 points into crit resit and still get hit hard, dk'and templars have major mending, sorcs have implosion and us nightblades have our strong burst. L2P AND STOP ASKING FOR CLASS NERFS, look at mag sorcs, they got nerfed and you rarely see them anymore in pvp.
I'm going to assume that you in fact use a Nightblade, which is why you're doing all you can to defend it from being nerfed. In fact, if I can recall correctly — you said you've killed me numerous times before. And how I'm supposedly "very easy" to kill. The only classes that have managed to kill me repeatedly without too much effort is the Nightblade class. Which would honestly make perfect sense.
Edit: Can we have the cost of Cloak increased with each use within a certain period of time, being as Bolt Escape was treated this way? After all, both of them are "escape skills". They both give a means of providing survivability to each class, should things get too messy. Please have 'proper' balance, and apply the same penalty to Nightblades as you have to Sorcerers. @Wrobel
BruhItsOver9000 wrote: »look at mag sorcs, they got nerfed and you rarely see them anymore in pvp.
I think that may be the overall goal of the OP.
I don't know where you play, but on EU they are freaking everywhere.
Nightblades are everywhere; no matter the platform. And it's obvious as to why people use them. The ease of use, as well as overtuned performance and skills. Constantly they've dodged and wiggled out of receiving some 'adjustments' and 'fixes'. It's ridiculous. Even from a PVE perspective, Nightblades MUST be toned down. It's beyond ridiculous at this point. Especially when so much content is based around stealthy play-styles (e.g. Imperial City, Thieves Guild, and Dark Brotherhood). Not to mention, it's the recommended class for beginners to start ESO for a reason. As well as class suggested by others to clear VMA with. There's a reason for this.
Please ZOS, for once apply proper balance and 'fix' the Nightblade class. It has gone on for far too long, and your player base has complained about it for months. Tone down the class already. Enough is enough.
BruhItsOver9000 wrote: »Isellskooma wrote: »Nightblades aren't squishy.BruhItsOver9000 wrote: »Once they nerf nightblades i quit. We nightblades are squishy, you nerf our burst, the class will die.
Troll or just a bad dps who can't deal decent damage against a nightblade? I wear 5 impen and have 47 points into crit resit and still get hit hard, dk'and templars have major mending, sorcs have implosion and us nightblades have our strong burst. L2P AND STOP ASKING FOR CLASS NERFS, look at mag sorcs, they got nerfed and you rarely see them anymore in pvp.
I'm going to assume that you in fact use a Nightblade, which is why you're doing all you can to defend it from being nerfed. In fact, if I can recall correctly — you said you've killed me numerous times before. And how I'm supposedly "very easy" to kill. The only classes that have managed to kill me repeatedly without too much effort is the Nightblade class. Which would honestly make perfect sense.
Edit: Can we have the cost of Cloak increased with each use within a certain period of time, being as Bolt Escape was treated this way? After all, both of them are "escape skills". They both give a means of providing survivability to each class, should things get too messy. Please have 'proper' balance, and apply the same penalty to Nightblades as you have to Sorcerers. @Wrobel
thankyourat wrote: »I love seeing the NB's are squishy posts lol people are clueless
Yeh, I never unserstand that too. Restances from their spammable, best cc in the game which can be used effectively for defence, cloak (albeit unreliable) which again gives resistances and even shade (yes, even on a stamblade).I like how every one is trying to say I'm just upset that I got ganked. I don't care if I die getting ganked. I'm not saying make it weaker by any means. Dawnbreaker is getting an increase and it does half the stuff. It hits more than one person l2p right?
Dragon leap can be dodge and it's over double the cost and only knocks back. I want Dragon leap to cost 30 ult which is fair because we don't get a passive for easy 20 ult.
Dawnbreaker is twice as good as incap though so it should cost twice as much. Whenever I use dbos on any of my stamina characters I'll see multiple 10k damage hits plus dot damage. This ultimate should cost more around 200 ult but that's for another argument. Dragon leap has a gap closer I believe that's why it cost so much, but dragon leap shouldn't probably only cost like 125 ult, it does hit like a truck though
Gilliamtherogue wrote: »The entire issue of DBoS and Incap (and any other cheap ultimate) is the existence of Battle Frenzy. Why in the world is there a passive that gives you 20 Ultimate PER kill, and STACKS further with things such as Soul Harvest + Fighter's Guild Passives? If you slot SH on a main bar as a Nightblade and you kill one target, you get 30 Ultimate (20 Battle Frenzy, 10 SH passive), now if they're a WW or Vampire that's 39. That means you only need to kill 3 players before you get another DBoS (4 once the ultimate cost increase goes through) when paired with default ultimate generation. This is why you see so many stam groups just wrecking face out there; even non NB's do it.
NB's currently have the highest ultimate generation in game, it's kind of their thing. SH passive + Catalyst passive + Siphoner Passive puts them above anyone else, and when paired with Battle Frenzy it's just absurd. They also have considerably weaker ultimates per cast (compare damage on a NB vs a Temp or Sorc per cast) to help alleviate the fact that they get it faster.
Further more, if you run Incap it means you don't have as high of ultimate generation, and removing Battle Frenzy would make it so you don't get almost half of your ult back on kill, leaving for much less chain bursting (the aspect people hate the most of playing against a NB).
This is now a nerf Battle Frenzy thread.
BruhItsOver9000 wrote: »Isellskooma wrote: »Nightblades aren't squishy.BruhItsOver9000 wrote: »Once they nerf nightblades i quit. We nightblades are squishy, you nerf our burst, the class will die.
Troll or just a bad dps who can't deal decent damage against a nightblade? I wear 5 impen and have 47 points into crit resit and still get hit hard, dk'and templars have major mending, sorcs have implosion and us nightblades have our strong burst. L2P AND STOP ASKING FOR CLASS NERFS, look at mag sorcs, they got nerfed and you rarely see them anymore in pvp.
BruhItsOver9000 wrote: »Once they nerf nightblades i quit. We nightblades are squishy, you nerf our burst, the class will die.
If you don't want to see your easy god mode play style nerfed like sorcs. Then may I suggest that you stop posting videos like this on the forums. Or I can just hand you a newer shovel. So you can dig your grave even faster.The power to burst people down in less time it take's take to break CC. More survivalbility then all but the wet noodle tanks. Super Mobility best in the game.
Yup you have pretty much confirmed to others. What I was trying to get them to see. Thank you, you made my job much easier. Now please ZOS for the love of everything apply the nerf bat nuke very generously to this class.
LBxFinalDeath wrote: »My nerf idea for stamblade would inherently be a buff for Mageblade.
Just get rid of the CC Incap strike does.
Soul Harvest won't be the steaming pile of refuse that barely gives you Ultimate back for killing someone with it that it is right now in comparison to the heal debuffing, glitchy CC causing, HARDER hitting Incap strike.
Stamblade would be balanced then and Magic Nightblade's ult wouldn't be as God awful when compared to what Incap can do..
Getting rid of the glitchy CC wouldn't effect Stamblade at all in PvE, it would just lower the amount of glitchy CCs in game.
#SayNoToGlitchyCCs
If you really wanna equalize the Ultimates just make it that soul harvest doesn't give ultimate if you get the kill with it but it debuffs their healing like Incap does but keep it doing Magic Damage while Incap would still debuff their healing and still do physical damage but no longer CC.
disintegr8 wrote: »My NB's do not need a nerf, I get pummeled every time I go into PVP, I think it is me that needs a buff instead. I do not have the patience to research, tweak, test, tweak, test, research again and so on for my builds, so they will never be as good as they could be. That doesn't mean that any of my characters need a buff or that anyone better than me needs a nerf.
If people have a good build and have taken the time to learn how to use it effectively, I do not think that warrants a call for a nerf. If you could role a NB and romp over everyone without putting any effort in, then a nerf is needed but I am living proof that this is not the case.
So do I those was the good old days.GreenSoup2HoT wrote: »
I agree with you in 1v1 stambladed are in a bad place.Their to squishy compare to the other classes.stamblades are currently the weakest stam class in duels. IMO. Anyone else agree?