Dragons exist, yes. Most of them are in hiding. One dragon boss somewhere in a trial wouldn't be lore-breaking. Dragons all over Tamriel or worse yet, dragon mounts - that would be very lore-breaking.
It's all about implementation.
Dragons exist, yes. Most of them are in hiding. One dragon boss somewhere in a trial wouldn't be lore-breaking. Dragons all over Tamriel or worse yet, dragon mounts - that would be very lore-breaking.
It's all about implementation.
randolphbenoit wrote: »At some point I like see dragons somewhere in the game but not as a reason to add flying mounts
MrAppleman wrote: »Why is this so important?
Aren't there only two times in tamriel that dragons were abundant? One of those already being a magical return of a dead species.
Molag already used a Dragon to learn how to make Titans, he no longer needs a dragon for that.
Because all good games have own unique flavor and there's no need to make every next Elder Scrolls game Skyrim 2.0. Dragons played an important role in Skyrim's story, but they don't in ESO, so you have to ask yourself if they can serve another interesting purpose here or would they be purely fanservice? Which I'm not necessarily against, it's nice to see throwbacks to previous games, but this one would have to be handled with care if we don't want it to become lore-breaking. That's why if it was going to happen, I'd be in favor of adding a dragon, singular, not dragons. This way we can also make it properly imposing and awe-inspiring as opposed to being an annoying flying menace like in Skyrim.MrAppleman wrote: »Why is this so important?
Aren't there only two times in tamriel that dragons were abundant? One of those already being a magical return of a dead species.
Molag already used a Dragon to learn how to make Titans, he no longer needs a dragon for that.
I would not say "important", but more "they were awesome in Skyrim, so why not add them to ESO too"?
and about the "only two times..." read the post with the lore citations pls
Because all good games have own unique flavor and there's no need to make every next Elder Scrolls game Skyrim 2.0. Dragons played an important role in Skyrim's story, but they don't in ESO, so you have to ask yourself if they can serve another interesting purpose here or would they be purely fanservice? Which I'm not necessarily against, it's nice to see throwbacks to previous games, but this one would have to be handled with care if we don't want it to become lore-breaking. That's why if it was going to happen, I'd be in favor of adding a dragon, singular, not dragons. This way we can also make it properly imposing and awe-inspiring as opoosed to being an annoying flying menace like in Skyrim.MrAppleman wrote: »Why is this so important?
Aren't there only two times in tamriel that dragons were abundant? One of those already being a magical return of a dead species.
Molag already used a Dragon to learn how to make Titans, he no longer needs a dragon for that.
I would not say "important", but more "they were awesome in Skyrim, so why not add them to ESO too"?
and about the "only two times..." read the post with the lore citations pls
As to "only two times", note the use of the word "abundant". They aren't abundant in the Second Era.
elias.stormneb18_ESO wrote: »One or a couple of Dragons connected to a specific questline wouldn't be in any way lorebreaking. People suggesting that ZOS should add things like Dragon mounts is what I take issue with.
Isellskooma wrote: »Why do so much people care about lore? Like zenimax please add dragons. Lore in ESO useless. It's holding them back from adding awesome stuff in.
UltimaJoe777 wrote: »Isellskooma wrote: »Why do so much people care about lore? Like zenimax please add dragons. Lore in ESO useless. It's holding them back from adding awesome stuff in.
Because Lore is what makes this series so awesome.
UltimaJoe777 wrote: »Isellskooma wrote: »Why do so much people care about lore? Like zenimax please add dragons. Lore in ESO useless. It's holding them back from adding awesome stuff in.
Because Lore is what makes this series so awesome.
yes, but if you check that my post above - with the citations from the lore, adding dragons is not against it
What's with this obsession the community seems to have with dragons anyway?
Okay, you found TWO dragons supposed to be alive in 2nd era... The only two survivors of the Dragon War. Maybe we will see one of them in the futur... Maybe one in Vvardenfell where he's supposed haveing landed. And the other one, we don't know... So it is thin to add dragons anyhow. At best one of the two will make an appearance in a future DLC , that's all.
Isellskooma wrote: »Why do so much people care about lore? Like zenimax please add dragons. Lore in ESO useless. It's holding them back from adding awesome stuff in.
For Talos...
Dragos are hiding, they are not hibernating or anything. Some of them, as the Atlas of Dragons states even have close relations with people.
Why do you guys hate on Dragons so much?