OP compared it to cloak therefore I answered with an explanation to cloak in terms of cost increase, read again please.
And to answer your question, yes I have played a magicka sorc to a point where I adapted to my magicka pool and I went stamina (Im imperial). I still see several sorcs that don't have an issue with streaking, and if you are streaking 5 (FIVE) times you should be out of trouble and if you are not, then you are not playing it right.
BurritoESO wrote: »lol no, you can still see sorcs streaking away repeatedly like if there was no punishment whatsoever.
Cloak barely works and is still being broken by gap closers, Uppercuts, and other shananigans. There was no sprinting cost increase but you dont regen stamina while you sprint anymore and its been like that for a while, and there is also a roll dodge penalty if you do it repeatedly.
This is a L2P issue of OP.
Have you ever played sorc? If so then you would realize that after 5 streaks you are out of magicka and can't fight unless you have a pot ready. And you can't compare anything to cloak because that is a broken skill that is bugged and not working as intended.
Were you around to experience Streak before they added penalties to make it it's current format? I ask because this is what you seem to want it reverted back to. They actually had very good reasons to balance it. It was ridiculous.
I agree, it was. But is it wrong to want something somewhere in between 'ridiculous' and 'useless mana drain'?
Lower the increasing costs. 'Back then' gap closers weren't as effective as they are now.
Back then gap closers worked until they "fixed" them. It can be argued now at best they are hit and miss. Most Sorcs still have Streak on their skill bars and still use it to gap close and/or escape successfully. So does it really need reviewing (honestly).
Any Sorc can Streak 3 times easily which is more than enough to escape far enough away to run off the penalty timer and streak again etc etc.
Nope. Try it.
You streak once. Two or three Stam types crit Rush and dog pile you because of the delay built in. Streak again. Guess what happens?
Third streak? Dead. You're being tea bagged.
Your being obtuse. The point is, gap closers and stam sprinting completely negate the utility of bolt escape in almost all circumstances except when the sorc Is Zerg surfing or gets through a door.BurritoESO wrote: »lol no, you can still see sorcs streaking away repeatedly like if there was no punishment whatsoever.
Cloak barely works and is still being broken by gap closers, Uppercuts, and other shananigans. There was no sprinting cost increase but you dont regen stamina while you sprint anymore and its been like that for a while, and there is also a roll dodge penalty if you do it repeatedly.
This is a L2P issue of OP.
Have you ever played sorc? If so then you would realize that after 5 streaks you are out of magicka and can't fight unless you have a pot ready. And you can't compare anything to cloak because that is a broken skill that is bugged and not working as intended.
Were you around to experience Streak before they added penalties to make it it's current format? I ask because this is what you seem to want it reverted back to. They actually had very good reasons to balance it. It was ridiculous.
I agree, it was. But is it wrong to want something somewhere in between 'ridiculous' and 'useless mana drain'?
Lower the increasing costs. 'Back then' gap closers weren't as effective as they are now.
Back then gap closers worked until they "fixed" them. It can be argued now at best they are hit and miss. Most Sorcs still have Streak on their skill bars and still use it to gap close and/or escape successfully. So does it really need reviewing (honestly).
Any Sorc can Streak 3 times easily which is more than enough to escape far enough away to run off the penalty timer and streak again etc etc.
Nope. Try it.
You streak once. Two or three Stam types crit Rush and dog pile you because of the delay built in. Streak again. Guess what happens?
Third streak? Dead. You're being tea bagged.
Crit Rush is a gap closer, what else should it do if not close gaps.
At this point I don't think there's any use trying to talk sense into those ppl. Most of them are stam players who have been conditioned to whine whenever a sorc managed to disengage and always viewed blink as unfair without realizing how it was intergral to the design of the class.Cinnamon_Spider wrote: »In addition to the cost increase making it nearly useless for re-positioning, it isn't even useful to chase after another player. Stam builds are able to move fast enough to get out of range of a magic sorc streaking after them. And it's dangerous for the sorc to do so, since they'll be out of magic after a few streaks.
Spot on OP. Shares, stuns and fear make fights so dull. Might as well have lag as its the same feeling not being able to actually push any buttons haha. Be nice to have some escape / cleanse back.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6GjwRMPYkzcBurritoESO wrote: »I agree. Sorcs can't stand their ground like a Templar or any stam class can. They should be able to strategically spread apart opponents using streak to help them survive open world solo and small scale.
OP compared it to cloak therefore I answered with an explanation to cloak in terms of cost increase, read again please.
And to answer your question, yes I have played a magicka sorc to a point where I adapted to my magicka pool and I went stamina (Im imperial). I still see several sorcs that don't have an issue with streaking, and if you are streaking 5 (FIVE) times you should be out of trouble and if you are not, then you are not playing it right.
BurritoESO wrote: »I agree. Sorcs can't stand their ground like a Templar or any stam class can. They should be able to strategically spread apart opponents using streak to help them survive open world solo and small scale.
That's because you don't have a house that @Wrobel built for you..... Instead you have the strongest shield in the game and a teleport that not only lets you climb up rocks no one else can get to, but stuns and does damage at the same time.
There's nothing wrong with Streak.... I'd trade that for the Templar house anyday....
BurritoESO wrote: »I agree. Sorcs can't stand their ground like a Templar or any stam class can. They should be able to strategically spread apart opponents using streak to help them survive open world solo and small scale.
That's because you don't have a house that @Wrobel built for you..... Instead you have the strongest shield in the game and a teleport that not only lets you climb up rocks no one else can get to, but stuns and does damage at the same time.
There's nothing wrong with Streak.... I'd trade that for the Templar house anyday....
BurritoESO wrote: »I agree. Sorcs can't stand their ground like a Templar or any stam class can. They should be able to strategically spread apart opponents using streak to help them survive open world solo and small scale.
That's because you don't have a house that @Wrobel built for you..... Instead you have the strongest shield in the game and a teleport that not only lets you climb up rocks no one else can get to, but stuns and does damage at the same time.
There's nothing wrong with Streak.... I'd trade that for the Templar house anyday....
Why aren´t you playing a sorc in that case?
BurritoESO wrote: »I agree. Sorcs can't stand their ground like a Templar or any stam class can. They should be able to strategically spread apart opponents using streak to help them survive open world solo and small scale.
That's because you don't have a house that @Wrobel built for you..... Instead you have the strongest shield in the game and a teleport that not only lets you climb up rocks no one else can get to, but stuns and does damage at the same time.
There's nothing wrong with Streak.... I'd trade that for the Templar house anyday....
Why aren´t you playing a sorc in that case?
@Derra I have a Sorc, I just enjoy the Templar more
Bryanonymous wrote: »Add the spam penalty to many other class abilities.