It could be cool, but you know people are evil right? They will probably ask guildies to spamm disagrees on certain subjects. Especially the casual scrolls that never leave the forums.
Anyway, having no agrees/awesomes/insightfull is kind of indicator already.
now they could also asks guildies or friends to "upvote" theyr post or comment.
jedtb16_ESO wrote: »if you disagree with a post.....leave a reply to that effect.
helps if you explain why you disagree too.
In every forum I participated on that had a system like this, "disagree" and "lol" were eventually removed. At least we still have "insightful" here.
It is always the same. People "disagree-bombing" some other people, the second group being super worried with internet points or whatnot and complaining, drama happening, mods removing the button. With the lol button, it is because people get upset when they make a serious post and other people use the lol button. Drama ensues all the same.
In one of the forums I participated on that had a system like this, there was a way of seeing who clicked each button using a loophole in the forum's coding. The drama went on and on for weeks. Friendships were ruined. People were banned. It was beautiful.
now they could also asks guildies or friends to "upvote" theyr post or comment.
I ask my friends to upvote my discussionsmost of them don't comply tho. (Don't judge, I an human and I need acceptance)
But I believe is okay to spam positivity. The problem is that it negativity aspect can be used to annoy (perharps even harass) another user that you may have a quarrel with. I don't know, keep it off table means less issues to worry about, imaging the amount of "people are disagree spamming me" posts that may happen. Right now the current system is okay, since have no upvotes at all already shows that, at least, people arent compalying with your ideas xD
vamp_emily wrote: »Maybe they should just remove insightful, agree, and awesome options.
I think not having a disagree option is misleading.
For example I could post a thread like "Emily is OP", and get 25 agrees, but in reality there were 2000 people who disagreed, but you will not see that number because there is no disagree option.
Somebody came in and gave an "insightful" to every post in this thread. Probably to prove a point... or something.
vamp_emily wrote: »Maybe they should just remove insightful, agree, and awesome options.
I think not having a disagree option is misleading.
For example I could post a thread like "Emily is OP", and get 25 agrees, but in reality there were 2000 people who disagreed, but you will not see that number because there is no disagree option.
driosketch wrote: »I disagree.
Here is a statement as to why I disagree.
A disagree has been tried twice before in Beta. The first time, 3 years ago, it would bury high disliked posts. Players abused it by systematically group down voting players they disliked. The second time it was returned during the closed beta with the smaller hand selected long term testers. It was removed again because players were using it in place of feed back.
There is a thrid time, if you want to count the sarcastic abuse of the lol button. At the time there was some definite toxicity in its use. There was probably some attempt to control the discussion by mass ridiculing dissenting opinions. And again, there was the lack of feedback, if you got a lol and didn't know why.
So now that there is a disagree plus a why: tldr it's easy to abuse and doesn't help understand the reason for disagreement.
Any one else wanting to disagree, but doesn't want to type a message out, can click agree on a post disagreeing like this one. (Assuming that post reflects why you disagree.)
driosketch wrote: »I disagree.
Here is a statement as to why I disagree.
A disagree has been tried twice before in Beta. The first time, 3 years ago, it would bury high disliked posts. Players abused it by systematically group down voting players they disliked. The second time it was returned during the closed beta with the smaller hand selected long term testers. It was removed again because players were using it in place of feed back.
There is a thrid time, if you want to count the sarcastic abuse of the lol button. At the time there was some definite toxicity in its use. There was probably some attempt to control the discussion by mass ridiculing dissenting opinions. And again, there was the lack of feedback, if you got a lol and didn't know why.
So now that there is a disagree plus a why: tldr it's easy to abuse and doesn't help understand the reason for disagreement.
Any one else wanting to disagree, but doesn't want to type a message out, can click agree on a post disagreeing like this one. (Assuming that post reflects why you disagree.)
Rohamad_Ali wrote: »Somebody came in and gave an "insightful" to every post in this thread. Probably to prove a point... or something.
Insightful gives you more stars . They think they are hurting your credibility but really just adding to it . The best way to show displeasure is to not give any reaction .
Rohamad_Ali wrote: »Somebody came in and gave an "insightful" to every post in this thread. Probably to prove a point... or something.
Insightful gives you more stars . They think they are hurting your credibility but really just adding to it . The best way to show displeasure is to not give any reaction .
Understood- sometimes it's fun to just throw out stars for the heck of it.
So, would a "disagree" button also add stars? Or maybe it would take them away? Or they'd just be a running tally of shame on your profile with no star value at all...