Bigevilpeter wrote: »Bigevilpeter wrote: »As for you point about vigor its a stamina ability and stamina characters mostly only self heal thats why so you point is moot.
I don't know what that has to do with anything. I have an Argonian Stam DK that uses Vigor.
Or is the pigeonholing of Argonians already complete?
i never said argonians dont use vigor i was reponding to the OP of why no one ever picks healing the teamates morph
I'm the OP.... and no-one picks the "heal others" morph of vigor, because healing received is better.
That's my point.
Your poll asks people which vigor morph is better, so they have the choice between increased range and a self heal buff. That does not exactly answer the question of if healing done is better than healing taken for Argonians, especially since vigor is not really used for group healing and is instead more widely used as the go-to stamina self-heal. Of course people who primarily use it as a self heal are going to pick the morph that heals them more.
I disagree with your premise that healing done is "completely useless," I'm quite looking forward to it. Yes, my main is an Argonian Templar healer, but so what? The healing taken passive has been quite useless to me so far, why pigeonhole all Argonians into the tank role?
I thought what they did by making it 5% healing done and 5% healing taken was a nice compromise: tanks get a tiny healing taken nerf, healers get a small healing done buff, and those who rely on self-heals don't see too much of a change. If anything this makes Argonians more flexible in their role choice, not less.
I sympathized with my tank-speced egg brothers and sisters when the entire healing taken passive was removed, however many of us Argonian healers are looking forward to having a passive that actually does something for us. What we have now is a good place to meet in the middle, I vote to leave it as it is on PTS.
Bigevilpeter wrote: »its should actually all be healing done so that argonians could have a niche in something, argonian tanks really didnt make a lot of sense and they werent the best tanks anyways.
As for you point about vigor its a stamina ability and stamina characters mostly only self heal thats why so you point is moot.
i actually considered playing argonian after they got 9% healing done then changed my mind when they changed it to 5 and 5%
kendellking_chaosb14_ESO wrote: »Bigevilpeter wrote: »its should actually all be healing done so that argonians could have a niche in something, argonian tanks really didnt make a lot of sense and they werent the best tanks anyways.
As for you point about vigor its a stamina ability and stamina characters mostly only self heal thats why so you point is moot.
i actually considered playing argonian after they got 9% healing done then changed my mind when they changed it to 5 and 5%
The point of being up Vigor is that show how pointless the healing done buff is the current min/max races both magic and stamina will still out heal Argonians. Nerfing tanks and DPS on heals to make healer a bit better when other races will still out heal us.
Let's just give up on this healing talk and make Argonian the Sneaky, Gorilla tactic masters and magically gifted bad*ss that we are in the lore. You know the lore from all the other games and even the damn home page of this game.
Bigevilpeter wrote: »Bigevilpeter wrote: »As for you point about vigor its a stamina ability and stamina characters mostly only self heal thats why so you point is moot.
I don't know what that has to do with anything. I have an Argonian Stam DK that uses Vigor.
Or is the pigeonholing of Argonians already complete?
i never said argonians dont use vigor i was reponding to the OP of why no one ever picks healing the teamates morph
I'm the OP.... and no-one picks the "heal others" morph of vigor, because healing received is better.
That's my point.