Maintenance for the week of April 6:
• PC/Mac: No maintenance – April 6

Are u HAPPY upcoming RACE Passive Changes!!!???

  • Forestd16b14_ESO
    Forestd16b14_ESO
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    ✭✭
    Cuddler wrote: »
    Well I like the stamina added to nords but does ZoS really need to nerf the health recovery ? Like 30% health recovery really isn't that OP.

    I personally think a max stamina bonus is close to useless on a tanking race. Nords are still not optimal as stamina DPS even with the change. I really like the +30% to health recovery on my Nord tank, and if ZOS is bent on nerfing it, I'd rather them replace it with stamina or magicka recovery.

    Well the stamina recovery be even more useless cause no stamina regen when blocking :p
  • Mettaricana
    Mettaricana
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    ✭✭✭
    So far live the bosmer changes it secures me stam sorcs race change now as I prefer not to be a cat or a common human or and orc. I wanted and always played elves in es games I tried to in eso and they all magicka except bosmer and 3% stam was to low now 6% on top of the stam recovery makes it much more worth it.

    Nord felt like an underdog from day one with useless passives that are irrelevant to 80% of the enemy damage types the stamina buff breathes life into tanks and nords doing stam dps outside of being a tank.

    Now bretons need some love the new passives is a useless sick joke with no value I mean seriously? 1% ap gain was it 10 ap per 1000..... wth am I gonna do with that? Scarp that crap give em a 2-4% magic dmg bonus
  • Leon119
    Leon119
    ✭✭✭✭
    Still sad the breton is inferior to altmers :(
    3% cost reduction gets worse with the more regen you have so the 9% regen altmers have is better.
    So essentially you choose over better sustain and damage or more spell resist
  • whiteshadow711jppreub18_ESO
    whiteshadow711jppreub18_ESO
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    No not happy, the Khajiit may be great in PvE but the Khajiit are the only race without a Attribute bonus and some races have two Attribute bonuses now and recovery as well..

    Giving the Khajiit race a Health attribute bonus of 5-6% would be good.
    Signed, Kotaro Atani.PS5 NA
    VR16/ CP 160 Khajiit Nightblade of the Aldmeri Dominion, Guildmaster and Assassin of the Queen's Hand guild on NA PC. PvP Officer in the WOLF guild on NA PS5, and of course Master Thief. Currently 3600 CP out of 3600 CP on NA PS5. Currently 810 CP on NA PC (used for PTS testing purposes only). On PS5 I am also a Master Crafter, all traits done and learned, Jewelry crafting done. all Motifs learned on PS5 except for maybe two-three Motifs. All Companions are Max level as are their Skills.Warrior, Lover, Thief.... Nightblade. Aldmeri Dominion For Life! For the Queen!! Go Dominion or go home ! "I have no hatred for the races of Man, but they are young. Like all children, they are driven by emotion. They lack the wisdom that comes with age. I would sooner place an Altmer infant on the Ruby Throne than surrender Tamriel to their capricious whims. The Altmer, the Bosmer and the Khajiit share the common traits of intelligence, patience and reason. We do not seek riches or plunder. Domination is not our goal, nor is the acclamation of power for its own sake. Today we make our stand. Today we take back the Ruby Throne, which is ours by ancient right and the blessings of the Divines. Stand with us." ―Your Queen Commands, Ayrenn Arana Aldmeri.(All 18 characters are AD only! This one is a AD Loyalist)Member of ESO Since January 29, 2014, started early Access 3/30/14 on PC, currently subbed on NA PS5 and on NA PC. Note- I only use PC for PTS testing purposes, the PS5 is my dedicated Game Platform.Note- for those that don't know how to say Kotaro Atani it's "Ko tar row Ah ta ni" (Ko with a Oh sound, tar which sounds like the sticky black tar stuff, row like rowing a boat, Ah with a AHHHH sound, Ta with a Tahhh sound, Neeee which sounds like knee)"The blowing sands of time wipe clean the footprints of the past...""Moonsugar may be the key to paradise, but it is through a false door...""A perfect society is always elsewhere..."- Unknown book of Khajiiti proverbs.
  • DHale
    DHale
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    No they listen too much to baddies. Buffs to all not nerfs to any.
    Sorcerna, proud beta sorc. RIP April 2014 to May 31 2016 DArk Brotherhood. Out of retirement for negates and encases. Sorcerna will be going back into retirement to be my main crafter Fall 2018. Because an 8 k shield is f ing useless. Died because of baddies on the forum. Too much qq too little pew pew. 16 AD 2 DC. 0 EP cause they bad, CP 2300 plus 18 level 50 toons. NA, PC, Grey Host#SORCLIVESMATTER actually they don’t or they wouldn’t keep getting nerfed constantly.
  • ADarklore
    ADarklore
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    Jaronking wrote: »
    Nope they nerfed Red guards for no reason their was no reason to change the passives again imo. They were perfectly fine and now we just got nerfs.

    Actually there WAS a reason, the reason being that the passives were not 'working as intended'. They were intended to all be 5/s but an error was involved that made the second two passives 3/s. So while this was a nerf, true, it was also a correction of an error. Furthermore, they wanted to bring the three Stamina races closer together, and they felt that 3/s put Redguard too far outside of that balance.
    Leon119 wrote: »
    Still sad the breton is inferior to altmers :(
    3% cost reduction gets worse with the more regen you have so the 9% regen altmers have is better.
    So essentially you choose over better sustain and damage or more spell resist

    Actually, with removal of VR ranks, the cost of abilities increased which makes cost reduction superior to regen in most cases.
    CP: 2105 ** ESO+ ** ~~ ***** Strictly a solo PvE quester *****
    ~~Started Playing: May 2015 | Stopped Playing: July 2025 | Returned: March 2026~~
  • kadar
    kadar
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    Change Khajiit health regen. Redguards and Wood elves now obliterate Khajiit in any PVP scenario.
  • Lord_Eomer
    Lord_Eomer
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    ✭✭
    ADarklore wrote: »
    Jaronking wrote: »
    Nope they nerfed Red guards for no reason their was no reason to change the passives again imo. They were perfectly fine and now we just got nerfs.

    Actually there WAS a reason, the reason being that the passives were not 'working as intended'. They were intended to all be 5/s but an error was involved that made the second two passives 3/s. So while this was a nerf, true, it was also a correction of an error. Furthermore, they wanted to bring the three Stamina races closer together, and they felt that 3/s put Redguard too far outside of that balance.
    Leon119 wrote: »
    Still sad the breton is inferior to altmers :(
    3% cost reduction gets worse with the more regen you have so the 9% regen altmers have is better.
    So essentially you choose over better sustain and damage or more spell resist

    Actually, with removal of VR ranks, the cost of abilities increased which makes cost reduction superior to regen in most cases.

    Lol, you can get reduction in many ways 3% is nothibg comparing Altemrs and Dunmer have more DPS.

    Light armor piece offers 2% reduction, Champion System offers 12%, seducer set offers 8%.

    How many reduction do you need?
  • Anhedonie
    Anhedonie
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    ✭✭
    Anhedonie wrote: »
    I think it wasn't necessary to buff dunmers, but argonians and nords still need some love.

    If it makes you feel better, it seems as if they broke the flame part of the passive when they made it.

    I'm not happy about it. I just think that dunmers were fine as it is.
    Profanity filter is a crime against the freedom of speech. Also gags.
  • ADarklore
    ADarklore
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    ADarklore wrote: »
    Jaronking wrote: »
    Nope they nerfed Red guards for no reason their was no reason to change the passives again imo. They were perfectly fine and now we just got nerfs.

    Actually there WAS a reason, the reason being that the passives were not 'working as intended'. They were intended to all be 5/s but an error was involved that made the second two passives 3/s. So while this was a nerf, true, it was also a correction of an error. Furthermore, they wanted to bring the three Stamina races closer together, and they felt that 3/s put Redguard too far outside of that balance.
    Leon119 wrote: »
    Still sad the breton is inferior to altmers :(
    3% cost reduction gets worse with the more regen you have so the 9% regen altmers have is better.
    So essentially you choose over better sustain and damage or more spell resist

    Actually, with removal of VR ranks, the cost of abilities increased which makes cost reduction superior to regen in most cases.

    Lol, you can get reduction in many ways 3% is nothibg comparing Altemrs and Dunmer have more DPS.

    Light armor piece offers 2% reduction, Champion System offers 12%, seducer set offers 8%.

    How many reduction do you need?

    Really? That's a serious question? If you can reduce the cost of abilities then you can spam without worrying about regen... so while Altmer and Dunmer may have higher damage capabilities, they still have to worry about running out of resources, but if your abilities cost very little, the existing regen would be enough to replenish because the cost to use abilities would be much, much less. You apparently didn't read the thread way back when on PTS where people were complaining about the increased cost of abilities with VR removal... people running out of resources, etc... and basically Eric Wrobel said, either on ESO Live or forum, something akin to 'players should be investing in cost reduction because it was now more beneficial than regen'.
    CP: 2105 ** ESO+ ** ~~ ***** Strictly a solo PvE quester *****
    ~~Started Playing: May 2015 | Stopped Playing: July 2025 | Returned: March 2026~~
  • Lord_Eomer
    Lord_Eomer
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    ✭✭
    ADarklore wrote: »
    ADarklore wrote: »
    Jaronking wrote: »
    Nope they nerfed Red guards for no reason their was no reason to change the passives again imo. They were perfectly fine and now we just got nerfs.

    Actually there WAS a reason, the reason being that the passives were not 'working as intended'. They were intended to all be 5/s but an error was involved that made the second two passives 3/s. So while this was a nerf, true, it was also a correction of an error. Furthermore, they wanted to bring the three Stamina races closer together, and they felt that 3/s put Redguard too far outside of that balance.
    Leon119 wrote: »
    Still sad the breton is inferior to altmers :(
    3% cost reduction gets worse with the more regen you have so the 9% regen altmers have is better.
    So essentially you choose over better sustain and damage or more spell resist

    Actually, with removal of VR ranks, the cost of abilities increased which makes cost reduction superior to regen in most cases.

    Lol, you can get reduction in many ways 3% is nothibg comparing Altemrs and Dunmer have more DPS.

    Light armor piece offers 2% reduction, Champion System offers 12%, seducer set offers 8%.

    How many reduction do you need?

    Really? That's a serious question? If you can reduce the cost of abilities then you can spam without worrying about regen... so while Altmer and Dunmer may have higher damage capabilities, they still have to worry about running out of resources, but if your abilities cost very little, the existing regen would be enough to replenish because the cost to use abilities would be much, much less. You apparently didn't read the thread way back when on PTS where people were complaining about the increased cost of abilities with VR removal... people running out of resources, etc... and basically Eric Wrobel said, either on ESO Live or forum, something akin to 'players should be investing in cost reduction because it was now more beneficial than regen'.

    3% cost reduction is not very valuable as other ways offers much reduction and it's enough to have for very sustained build.

    You need to understand that at certain point keep getting recovery or reduction is useless because u also need good DPS..do you think Altemrs can not spam? Or Dunmer can not?
    Edited by Lord_Eomer on July 13, 2016 12:32PM
  • ADarklore
    ADarklore
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    ADarklore wrote: »
    ADarklore wrote: »
    Jaronking wrote: »
    Nope they nerfed Red guards for no reason their was no reason to change the passives again imo. They were perfectly fine and now we just got nerfs.

    Actually there WAS a reason, the reason being that the passives were not 'working as intended'. They were intended to all be 5/s but an error was involved that made the second two passives 3/s. So while this was a nerf, true, it was also a correction of an error. Furthermore, they wanted to bring the three Stamina races closer together, and they felt that 3/s put Redguard too far outside of that balance.
    Leon119 wrote: »
    Still sad the breton is inferior to altmers :(
    3% cost reduction gets worse with the more regen you have so the 9% regen altmers have is better.
    So essentially you choose over better sustain and damage or more spell resist

    Actually, with removal of VR ranks, the cost of abilities increased which makes cost reduction superior to regen in most cases.

    Lol, you can get reduction in many ways 3% is nothibg comparing Altemrs and Dunmer have more DPS.

    Light armor piece offers 2% reduction, Champion System offers 12%, seducer set offers 8%.

    How many reduction do you need?

    Really? That's a serious question? If you can reduce the cost of abilities then you can spam without worrying about regen... so while Altmer and Dunmer may have higher damage capabilities, they still have to worry about running out of resources, but if your abilities cost very little, the existing regen would be enough to replenish because the cost to use abilities would be much, much less. You apparently didn't read the thread way back when on PTS where people were complaining about the increased cost of abilities with VR removal... people running out of resources, etc... and basically Eric Wrobel said, either on ESO Live or forum, something akin to 'players should be investing in cost reduction because it was now more beneficial than regen'.

    3% cost reduction is not very valuable as other ways offers much reduction and it's enough to have for very sustained build.

    You need to understand that at certain point keep getting recovery or reduction is useless because u also need good DPS..do you think Altemrs can not spam? Or Dunmer can not?

    3% IS valuable when stacked on top of all the reductions, that's the part you seem to be missing. 3% on it's own doesn't appear that high, although Eric Wrobel says it's HUGE... but when stacked with CP and cost reduction enchants, I can spam offensive and defensive abilities without worrying about running out of resources. You seem to want to specialize in ending a battle quickly, but it's when those battles drag on that you'll see the difference... but you also seem to think races outside of Altmer and Dunmer do poor damage, but my Breton Magicka Templar begs to differ on that; he has the offensive capabilities, cost reduction, andt also the defensive capabilities to survive a prolonged battle.
    CP: 2105 ** ESO+ ** ~~ ***** Strictly a solo PvE quester *****
    ~~Started Playing: May 2015 | Stopped Playing: July 2025 | Returned: March 2026~~
  • Lord_Eomer
    Lord_Eomer
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    ✭✭
    ADarklore wrote: »
    ADarklore wrote: »
    ADarklore wrote: »
    Jaronking wrote: »
    Nope they nerfed Red guards for no reason their was no reason to change the passives again imo. They were perfectly fine and now we just got nerfs.

    Actually there WAS a reason, the reason being that the passives were not 'working as intended'. They were intended to all be 5/s but an error was involved that made the second two passives 3/s. So while this was a nerf, true, it was also a correction of an error. Furthermore, they wanted to bring the three Stamina races closer together, and they felt that 3/s put Redguard too far outside of that balance.
    Leon119 wrote: »
    Still sad the breton is inferior to altmers :(
    3% cost reduction gets worse with the more regen you have so the 9% regen altmers have is better.
    So essentially you choose over better sustain and damage or more spell resist

    Actually, with removal of VR ranks, the cost of abilities increased which makes cost reduction superior to regen in most cases.

    Lol, you can get reduction in many ways 3% is nothibg comparing Altemrs and Dunmer have more DPS.

    Light armor piece offers 2% reduction, Champion System offers 12%, seducer set offers 8%.

    How many reduction do you need?

    Really? That's a serious question? If you can reduce the cost of abilities then you can spam without worrying about regen... so while Altmer and Dunmer may have higher damage capabilities, they still have to worry about running out of resources, but if your abilities cost very little, the existing regen would be enough to replenish because the cost to use abilities would be much, much less. You apparently didn't read the thread way back when on PTS where people were complaining about the increased cost of abilities with VR removal... people running out of resources, etc... and basically Eric Wrobel said, either on ESO Live or forum, something akin to 'players should be investing in cost reduction because it was now more beneficial than regen'.

    3% cost reduction is not very valuable as other ways offers much reduction and it's enough to have for very sustained build.

    You need to understand that at certain point keep getting recovery or reduction is useless because u also need good DPS..do you think Altemrs can not spam? Or Dunmer can not?

    3% IS valuable when stacked on top of all the reductions, that's the part you seem to be missing. 3% on it's own doesn't appear that high, although Eric Wrobel says it's HUGE... but when stacked with CP and cost reduction enchants, I can spam offensive and defensive abilities without worrying about running out of resources. You seem to want to specialize in ending a battle quickly, but it's when those battles drag on that you'll see the difference... but you also seem to think races outside of Altmer and Dunmer do poor damage, but my Breton Magicka Templar begs to differ on that; he has the offensive capabilities, cost reduction, andt also the defensive capabilities to survive a prolonged battle.

    This is wrong, I used altltemer even for long battles and did not have any magicka issue, they have 9% recovery buff (with champion point you can further increase by 25% comparing reduction only to 12%, b vampire passive also adds 10%) comparing breton 3% reduction is useless.

    I think u shld try out Altemrs yourself. 3% reduction stack is crap, Altemrs have magicka recovery which fits pretty much and damage buff is awesome. You can spam any offensive or defensive spell wih Altemrs. Saying it's breton only is pathetic..stack 3% is lame and for kids to digest..

    I have 5 bretons and I am not at satisfied over this 3% crap comparing Altemrs. I have tested both and I am very correct and will change race ones come out.
    Edited by Lord_Eomer on July 13, 2016 12:51PM
  • ADarklore
    ADarklore
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    ADarklore wrote: »
    ADarklore wrote: »
    ADarklore wrote: »
    Jaronking wrote: »
    Nope they nerfed Red guards for no reason their was no reason to change the passives again imo. They were perfectly fine and now we just got nerfs.

    Actually there WAS a reason, the reason being that the passives were not 'working as intended'. They were intended to all be 5/s but an error was involved that made the second two passives 3/s. So while this was a nerf, true, it was also a correction of an error. Furthermore, they wanted to bring the three Stamina races closer together, and they felt that 3/s put Redguard too far outside of that balance.
    Leon119 wrote: »
    Still sad the breton is inferior to altmers :(
    3% cost reduction gets worse with the more regen you have so the 9% regen altmers have is better.
    So essentially you choose over better sustain and damage or more spell resist

    Actually, with removal of VR ranks, the cost of abilities increased which makes cost reduction superior to regen in most cases.

    Lol, you can get reduction in many ways 3% is nothibg comparing Altemrs and Dunmer have more DPS.

    Light armor piece offers 2% reduction, Champion System offers 12%, seducer set offers 8%.

    How many reduction do you need?

    Really? That's a serious question? If you can reduce the cost of abilities then you can spam without worrying about regen... so while Altmer and Dunmer may have higher damage capabilities, they still have to worry about running out of resources, but if your abilities cost very little, the existing regen would be enough to replenish because the cost to use abilities would be much, much less. You apparently didn't read the thread way back when on PTS where people were complaining about the increased cost of abilities with VR removal... people running out of resources, etc... and basically Eric Wrobel said, either on ESO Live or forum, something akin to 'players should be investing in cost reduction because it was now more beneficial than regen'.

    3% cost reduction is not very valuable as other ways offers much reduction and it's enough to have for very sustained build.

    You need to understand that at certain point keep getting recovery or reduction is useless because u also need good DPS..do you think Altemrs can not spam? Or Dunmer can not?

    3% IS valuable when stacked on top of all the reductions, that's the part you seem to be missing. 3% on it's own doesn't appear that high, although Eric Wrobel says it's HUGE... but when stacked with CP and cost reduction enchants, I can spam offensive and defensive abilities without worrying about running out of resources. You seem to want to specialize in ending a battle quickly, but it's when those battles drag on that you'll see the difference... but you also seem to think races outside of Altmer and Dunmer do poor damage, but my Breton Magicka Templar begs to differ on that; he has the offensive capabilities, cost reduction, andt also the defensive capabilities to survive a prolonged battle.

    This is wrong, I used altltemer even for long battles and did not have any magicka issue, they have 9% recovery buff (with champion point you can further increase by 25% comparing reduction only to 12%, b vampire passive also adds 10%) comparing breton 3% reduction is useless.

    I think u shld try out Altemrs yourself. 3% reduction stack is crap, Altemrs have magicka recovery which fits pretty much and damage buff is awesome. You can spam any offensive or defensive spell wih Altemrs. Saying it's breton only is pathetic..stack 3% is lame and for kids to digest..

    I have 5 bretons and I am not at satisfied over this 3% crap comparing Altemrs. I have tested both and I am very correct and will change race ones come out.

    It's hard to take what you're saying seriously when you're wrong on a major point... in CP you can stack reduction to 16%, that's a far cry from 12%... so clearly you've never tried reduction versus regen. But if you want to jump on the min/maxer bandwagon and believe the ONLY WAY to success is by min/maxing racials that's your choice... but numerous other players are just as successful with other races. So if you need those extra racial percents to be successful, I think that says more about you as a player than about what the racials are lacking.
    CP: 2105 ** ESO+ ** ~~ ***** Strictly a solo PvE quester *****
    ~~Started Playing: May 2015 | Stopped Playing: July 2025 | Returned: March 2026~~
  • Lord_Eomer
    Lord_Eomer
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    ✭✭
    ADarklore wrote: »
    ADarklore wrote: »
    ADarklore wrote: »
    ADarklore wrote: »
    Jaronking wrote: »
    Nope they nerfed Red guards for no reason their was no reason to change the passives again imo. They were perfectly fine and now we just got nerfs.

    Actually there WAS a reason, the reason being that the passives were not 'working as intended'. They were intended to all be 5/s but an error was involved that made the second two passives 3/s. So while this was a nerf, true, it was also a correction of an error. Furthermore, they wanted to bring the three Stamina races closer together, and they felt that 3/s put Redguard too far outside of that balance.
    Leon119 wrote: »
    Still sad the breton is inferior to altmers :(
    3% cost reduction gets worse with the more regen you have so the 9% regen altmers have is better.
    So essentially you choose over better sustain and damage or more spell resist

    Actually, with removal of VR ranks, the cost of abilities increased which makes cost reduction superior to regen in most cases.

    Lol, you can get reduction in many ways 3% is nothibg comparing Altemrs and Dunmer have more DPS.

    Light armor piece offers 2% reduction, Champion System offers 12%, seducer set offers 8%.

    How many reduction do you need?

    Really? That's a serious question? If you can reduce the cost of abilities then you can spam without worrying about regen... so while Altmer and Dunmer may have higher damage capabilities, they still have to worry about running out of resources, but if your abilities cost very little, the existing regen would be enough to replenish because the cost to use abilities would be much, much less. You apparently didn't read the thread way back when on PTS where people were complaining about the increased cost of abilities with VR removal... people running out of resources, etc... and basically Eric Wrobel said, either on ESO Live or forum, something akin to 'players should be investing in cost reduction because it was now more beneficial than regen'.

    3% cost reduction is not very valuable as other ways offers much reduction and it's enough to have for very sustained build.

    You need to understand that at certain point keep getting recovery or reduction is useless because u also need good DPS..do you think Altemrs can not spam? Or Dunmer can not?

    3% IS valuable when stacked on top of all the reductions, that's the part you seem to be missing. 3% on it's own doesn't appear that high, although Eric Wrobel says it's HUGE... but when stacked with CP and cost reduction enchants, I can spam offensive and defensive abilities without worrying about running out of resources. You seem to want to specialize in ending a battle quickly, but it's when those battles drag on that you'll see the difference... but you also seem to think races outside of Altmer and Dunmer do poor damage, but my Breton Magicka Templar begs to differ on that; he has the offensive capabilities, cost reduction, andt also the defensive capabilities to survive a prolonged battle.

    This is wrong, I used altltemer even for long battles and did not have any magicka issue, they have 9% recovery buff (with champion point you can further increase by 25% comparing reduction only to 12%, b vampire passive also adds 10%) comparing breton 3% reduction is useless.

    I think u shld try out Altemrs yourself. 3% reduction stack is crap, Altemrs have magicka recovery which fits pretty much and damage buff is awesome. You can spam any offensive or defensive spell wih Altemrs. Saying it's breton only is pathetic..stack 3% is lame and for kids to digest..

    I have 5 bretons and I am not at satisfied over this 3% crap comparing Altemrs. I have tested both and I am very correct and will change race ones come out.

    It's hard to take what you're saying seriously when you're wrong on a major point... in CP you can stack reduction to 16%, that's a far cry from 12%... so clearly you've never tried reduction versus regen. But if you want to jump on the min/maxer bandwagon and believe the ONLY WAY to success is by min/maxing racials that's your choice... but numerous other players are just as successful with other races. So if you need those extra racial percents to be successful, I think that says more about you as a player than about what the racials are lacking.

    I am not currently playing ESO, may be it's 16% not sure right now. Wow u are taking this very seriously.. I am surprised how u judge stuff..

    Though I have 610 CP, wih increase CP limit even this 3% stack will be much useless and not any good added value..

    Cost reduction works best with recovery and my request is to give Breton damage buff and may remove this 3% useless bonus.

    100 CP offers 25% recovery buff and 100cp offers 16% spell reduction..

    So this is even more better that 16% reduction offered by Champion System (I as mentioning 12%), so how much reduction is needed? Is not without passive enough?

    2 % reduction per light armor piece
    16% reduction Champion System
    8% reduction seducer set

    No need more reduction..
    Edited by Lord_Eomer on July 13, 2016 1:45PM
  • Aquanova
    Aquanova
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    They need to increase Argonian max magicka to 6% period!

    Just dicking around with 3% is BS, as they are aware of. Look at Bosmer now ;)

    Imo, 6% max stat should be the standard minimum from now on.

    3% is CRAP!
    NA/PC
  • Lord_Eomer
    Lord_Eomer
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    ✭✭
    Aquanova wrote: »
    They need to increase Argonian max magicka to 6% period!

    Just dicking around with 3% is BS, as they are aware of. Look at Bosmer now ;)

    Imo, 6% max stat should be the standard minimum from now on.

    3% is CRAP!

    Bosmer is good now, Cats suffered from rollback and no body is taking lizard folks seriously ..
    Edited by Lord_Eomer on July 13, 2016 1:47PM
  • Aquanova
    Aquanova
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    Aquanova wrote: »
    They need to increase Argonian max magicka to 6% period!

    Just dicking around with 3% is BS, as they are aware of. Look at Bosmer now ;)

    Imo, 6% max stat should be the standard minimum from now on.

    3% is CRAP!

    Bosmer is good now, Cats suffered from rollback and no body is taking lizard folks seriously ..

    ^There you go!

    2 weeks till release, so let's hope the metric that ZOS uses allows for at least another 3% max magicka increase.

    ZOS, are you doing this on purpose to entice race change?
    NA/PC
  • Minalan
    Minalan
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    ✭✭✭✭
    Make Breton competitive.

    At least raise the spell resist and the cost reduction passives.
Sign In or Register to comment.