GreenhaloX wrote: »It is actually funny cause when you're new and just getting into the game, you first read that ESO is no subscription required. Of course that is true for the non-DLC portion, but then to be able to get into Wrothgar and Hew's bane (and now DB), you have to subscribe. I know you don't have to.. but, that is not the point. Normally for a good game, such as this, you would drop the extra money and get the DLC. However, unlike this game, other games' DLC are normally a one-time purchase. To experience the most out of ESO and Tamriel, you would need to get all the DLC. So, overall, ESO is technically subscription required. I find that funny because there is no mention of a required subscription for the DLCs when you first buy the main game. I guess.. unless you have the time and dedication to properly research beforehand.
Cancelled mine this morning, although it's a six month cycle which renewed a couple of weeks ago so I have some time left to see if things change before losing ESO+ perks.
First reason: the shambles which is the cheat engine issue.
Second reason: @ZOS_MattFiror saying there are no hardcore ESO players. I know it was not his intent, but that's pretty damn insulting to the people like myself who have been here since the start.
Also just to show I'm not bluffing.
As I stated in my thread, I cancelled my ESO+ subscription because I have no reason to believe ZOS will be bringing the game back to something I want to support financially.
The straw that broke the camel's back would be Matt Firor's interview where he basically wrote off zero-day subscribers like me. In his words, ZOS will cater the game to people who log in after a DLC is out, play for 2 weeks then leave again.
I and many others have subscribed to the game since early access and have kept our subs through the initial item dupe exploits, bot-ridden delves, teleporting crafting node farmers, then the infamous "lighting" patch that broke Cyrodiil bringing most players' FPS down to single digits, the bait-and-switch of announcing their commitment to a subscription-only model and then going F2P, the months upon months of waiting for new content which going forward will consist of tiny "episodic" DLC...
We've also seen every single aspect of the game turn into a grind and RNG fest. Remember when motifs were books you randomly found and went "oh, neat, a motif!"? With the Dwemer one they introduced 14 separate pages for each motif, and with Glass they broke each of those into 10 fragments tied to RNG and a non-repeatable daily quest. Item sets are the same, layer upon layer of RNG, coupled with BoP, meaning that regardless of the effort you put in you may never see a particular piece of gear ever...
Not to mention the constant bugs - after TG launched I couldn't res using soul gems for 3 weeks, now since DB I can't use mementos; random long loading screens, especially in Cyrodiil, inability to use doors without switching weapons, roll dodging and/or killing your firstborn, in-combat status for minutes after any action has ended, rendering you unable to mount or efficiently recover resources...
In Matt Firor's view, which for all purposes is ZOS' view, these players are worth nothing to the company. Zero. I've spent north of €400 on this game, between the purchase and keeping my sub from the very first day. Apparently they don't appreciate my patronage, nor do they need it going forward. I'm happy to comply.
because i bought IC with all my saved up crowns from subbing, the pve DLCs dont interest me and thats all they keep churning out and they dont deserve my money when it's more stressful then enjoyable to play the game
GreenhaloX wrote: »It is actually funny cause when you're new and just getting into the game, you first read that ESO is no subscription required. Of course that is true for the non-DLC portion, but then to be able to get into Wrothgar and Hew's bane (and now DB), you have to subscribe. I know you don't have to.. but, that is not the point. Normally for a good game, such as this, you would drop the extra money and get the DLC. However, unlike this game, other games' DLC are normally a one-time purchase. To experience the most out of ESO and Tamriel, you would need to get all the DLC. So, overall, ESO is technically subscription required. I find that funny because there is no mention of a required subscription for the DLCs when you first buy the main game. I guess.. unless you have the time and dedication to properly research beforehand.
It could just be the fact that it's morning, but I'm almost positive Darya came in here, locked the thread, and then reverted. The panic they're feeling must be real.
Noo, I'm pretty sure this one was locked....
Animal_Mother wrote: »The reasons why I have left, and sub only intermittently, include cheating (not just recently, but ongoing since launch), Templar non-fixes/nerfs, lack of communication, and lack of quality with every DLC despite getting feedback and reports from the PTS (woo hoo - bugs).
But what is really starting to irk me is the heavy-handed response by mods on the forums. I'm this far || from calling customer service and trying to get a refund for the game card I bought.
Second reason: @ZOS_MattFiror saying there are no hardcore ESO players. I know it was not his intent, but that's pretty damn insulting to the people like myself who have been here since the start.
It could just be the fact that it's morning, but I'm almost positive Darya came in here, locked the thread, and then reverted. The panic they're feeling must be real.Noo, I'm pretty sure this one was locked....
The thread did get locked.I came in to see what reason was given but there was none.
Seeing as the moderators are waking up now I actually have a request.
Please can you leave this thread open as long as it remains constructive @ZOS_AlanG @ZOS_DaryaK
I noticed when I closed my sub there was little chance for giving feedback as to why, and it's interesting reading the longer replies from players like @daemonios
Maybe forward this thread on to someone who could make use of the feedback which causes members to close subscriptions.
It could just be the fact that it's morning, but I'm almost positive Darya came in here, locked the thread, and then reverted. The panic they're feeling must be real.Noo, I'm pretty sure this one was locked....
The thread did get locked.I came in to see what reason was given but there was none.
This is a good feedback thread for them as when you close a sub you don't have an option to give a reason as to why. I guess as long as we act good they will let us explain each reason for leaving.
RinaldoGandolphi wrote: »I stopped by sub because:
1. Unbanning known cheaters
2. Bugs and glitches that have been unfixed in over a year
3. Creating a new game every patch in terms of class balance
4. Class balance an absolute mess
5. Gear and traits all pigeonholed into 1 way be it PVE or PVP
6. Too many useless gear sets resulting less build diversity
7. Immortal guards more powerful then Molag Bal
8. Immortal Guards with an insane detection radius
9. Broken CC Immunity in PVP
10. No Immunity to being root or snared spammed.
11. Allowing crafting writ exploiters to benefit from their ill gotten gains after 3 days of time-out.
12. Lag and broken PVP since the Lighting Patch
Those are probably the main ones. i'd be a paying customer again with some policy shifts,but the current policy with #1 is simply unacceptable to me, and I won't play or pay until its rectified, and the only thing i can do as a consumer is close my wallet, im only one person, but its the only means i have.
KaleidoscopeEyz wrote: »As a console player, I never subbed. It seems as unnatural to me as square pizza.
KaleidoscopeEyz wrote: »As a console player, I never subbed. It seems as unnatural to me as square pizza.
I buy square Pizza often.At Pizza Hut.It is thick crust and comes with bread sticks!
(oh,and I sub)