Korah_Eaglecry wrote: »FLuFFyxMuFFiN wrote: »nope nothing wrong with it, sub for the bag.
A lot people aren't smart enough to comprehend this @Mojmir
The bags were always intended to be a sub benefit but people still complain. The only thing I have to say to the people who refuse to sub for the bag and complain about not having one is to either shut up and be happy with what you have or leave and don't come back. It is their own fault for not subbing that they don't have the bag.
The crazy thing is, they claim to buy Crowns all the time. If they purchase anything more than 1500 Crowns they have no reason NOT to sub. They get the 15 dollars worth in crowns, all the benefits and can still purchase whatever it is they set out to purchase.
If youre buying up the LTO mounts or costumes every month. Youre definitely buying more Crowns then youd need for the Sub. At that point why not invest in the sub and still get what youre after?
WhoThenNow7 wrote: »I wish they would just make the game pay to play so everyone gets the same benefits, or get rid of eso+ all together. Lets face it, 10% extra experience is an absolute joke. As soon as crafting bags hit the crown store, I'm cancelling my sub.
Personofsecrets wrote: »rotaugen454 wrote: »Personofsecrets wrote: »The idea behind subbing for many people has always been that people sub so that they can support the game, support developers making choices that they like, and help move the game to newer and cooler places.
Due to the XP bonus, but even more so now due to the extra inventory space, the subscription model is turning into one in which people feel the urge to sub for bonuses rather than the urge to sub to help others help the game.
That is where the issue lies. Any bonus tied to giving the game money is not only pay to win, but it is also a perversion of our societal values or morals because the bonuses, yes cause disparity between subs and non-subs, but also undermine the notions that build a donation base; being generous, supporting others, and guiding the development of the game via a subscription are those undermined notions.
What? This is a business, and people pay for a product. What they choose to sell and what we choose to buy don't have anything to do with societal values or morals. I hope you are being sarcastic and that my sarcasm meter needs batteries.
Capitalism without values guiding that aspect of life results in a perverse monster.
Forgive me, I might have nodded off a bit in the depths of this thread, but we're still talking about video games here, right?
Personofsecrets wrote: »rotaugen454 wrote: »Personofsecrets wrote: »The idea behind subbing for many people has always been that people sub so that they can support the game, support developers making choices that they like, and help move the game to newer and cooler places.
Due to the XP bonus, but even more so now due to the extra inventory space, the subscription model is turning into one in which people feel the urge to sub for bonuses rather than the urge to sub to help others help the game.
That is where the issue lies. Any bonus tied to giving the game money is not only pay to win, but it is also a perversion of our societal values or morals because the bonuses, yes cause disparity between subs and non-subs, but also undermine the notions that build a donation base; being generous, supporting others, and guiding the development of the game via a subscription are those undermined notions.
What? This is a business, and people pay for a product. What they choose to sell and what we choose to buy don't have anything to do with societal values or morals. I hope you are being sarcastic and that my sarcasm meter needs batteries.
Capitalism without values guiding that aspect of life results in a perverse monster.
Forgive me, I might have nodded off a bit in the depths of this thread, but we're still talking about video games here, right?
No, this thread is now about twinkies. Or kittens. Or twinkies stuffed with kittens.
FLuFFyxMuFFiN wrote: »Korah_Eaglecry wrote: »FLuFFyxMuFFiN wrote: »nope nothing wrong with it, sub for the bag.
A lot people aren't smart enough to comprehend this @Mojmir
The bags were always intended to be a sub benefit but people still complain. The only thing I have to say to the people who refuse to sub for the bag and complain about not having one is to either shut up and be happy with what you have or leave and don't come back. It is their own fault for not subbing that they don't have the bag.
The crazy thing is, they claim to buy Crowns all the time. If they purchase anything more than 1500 Crowns they have no reason NOT to sub. They get the 15 dollars worth in crowns, all the benefits and can still purchase whatever it is they set out to purchase.
If youre buying up the LTO mounts or costumes every month. Youre definitely buying more Crowns then youd need for the Sub. At that point why not invest in the sub and still get what youre after?
Exactly. I don't understand why people can get that through their heads.
Honestly i have been a ESO+ member since the launch of the game. (paid from beta to B2P then continued to sub) and to be honest, the EXP boost is laughable, the DLC rental is nice BUT if i do not pay my sub it goes bye bye. And the crowns they grant go quick. The crafting bag is a perk that will actually entice people to sub and it is nice.
clayandaudrey_ESO wrote: »Does nobody else see how wrong this is? (That this thread is still going)
ShedsHisTail wrote: »A lot of people seem to be missing the OP's point. That point being, ZoS should make craft bags available for purchase, in addition to being made available to ESO+ members. ZoS get's paid, customer gets crafting bag, and ESO+ members still get there perks in a way that doesn't slap other loyal customers in the face. It's a win+win situation, and everyone is happy. It is the only reasonable way crafting bags should be implemented.
But that's not true.
As outlined in my math above, subscribers run in a state of perpetual deficit in comparison with non subscribers. The ammount of deficit changes depending on how much time has passed between DLCS, but the fact remains.
Crafting bags are an incentive to those willing to accept and commit to that deficit.
In raw Quantity per Crown,non subs always run cheaper than subs. And a one-time purchase won't change that.
ManwithBeard9 wrote: »WhoThenNow7 wrote: »I wish they would just make the game pay to play so everyone gets the same benefits, or get rid of eso+ all together. Lets face it, 10% extra experience is an absolute joke. As soon as crafting bags hit the crown store, I'm cancelling my sub.
The "infinite" crafting bag will never hit the crown store. They should offer a limited size version or at least start increasing bank/carry space.
TL;DR
ESO+ Does need more benefits, but the crafting bag should not be considered a benefit since it is a feature that should have been in place since the game launched like any other recent MMO. Take a look around, and you will see that it is just a trick to rip players off. That is not a sustainable business practice by any means.
Hallothiel wrote: »@Necrelios - agree.
Zos need to decide whether this game is sub or not. It sold itself after the revamp as not requiring a sub so maybe that is why some are annoyed. And if you have tried the game & now like crafting, feels a bit like they are pulling a fast one.
NewBlacksmurf wrote: »SleepyTroll wrote: »NewBlacksmurf wrote: »In short.....
-The bag should be a base game feature and the ability to obtain the bag should be in-line with:
-crowns
-in-game gold
-ESO Plus
There are a lot of arguments or opinions but bottom line is this. ZOS has moved away from their initial confirmation of what would be linked to a subscription and what would be in the crown store.
Also, the fact that ESO Plus doesn't work as it should on Xbox One, the bag or any other features should be exclusive to a sub.
How have they gone away with what they said as far as subscription and crown store? the BAG is convenience like literally if I could describe the bag I would say: a bag to conveniently store crafting items instead of having to visit the bank or mule alts.
The first and most obvious is what I mention as respects to Xbox One...this has been the case since day 1 and it still occurs as recent as April 28th 2016
http://www.elderscrollsonline.com/en-us/news/post/2015/03/17/crown-store-showcase
" Don't forget that members of ESO Plus receive a monthly allotment of crowns in addition to other in-game bonuses! "
The other concern is items that are locked behind a sub or crowns
http://www.elderscrollsonline.com/en-us/news/post/2015/02/12/the-road-ahead---february
"he most important thing to remember about Tamriel Unlimited's virtual currency system is that we're not adjusting the base game—it will be exactly the same game, with the same leveling pace, experience point gain, user interface, etc.
We're adding customization and convenience items in the Crown Store, but those will be added to the game as it is now; we're not going to make it harder for you to enjoy the game you already play to encourage you to use the Crown Store."
"Game Director Matt Firor explained that the base game will maintain "the same levelling pace, experience point gain, [and] user interface" it always has, and promised that it won't be made more difficult to play for those who don't spring for real-money items."
"An item in the Crown Store serves one of two purposes: It either provides a visual upgrade or distinction for your character, or it provides a way to save time at the expense of spending Crowns," he wrote. "When it comes to this second category of items, we will generally make in-game variants of similar items available either as drops or as player-craftable items as well."
Not sure if you're on PTS but therGiles.floydub17_ESO wrote: »Thank you for your oppinion. However I disagree. ESO has every right to provide these bags exclusively to subscribers and no need to bow threads like this one.
Anyone with basic economic and marketing knowledge would understand that subscriptions are the prefered source of income for a great many reasons. At that this carrot added to the ESO+ benefits is a big plus for marketing subscriptions.
In the end, crafting bag exclusive to ESO + is a win win for Zos. You can sub if you want to.
@Giles.floydub17_ESO just read right above....its not a matter of opinion according to my comments above. While others have input their opinions and such, when the director of any company goes public with statements, that company should always make decisions around those statements.
This literally makes the game more difficult in respects to inventory management without a sub so a few things.
1. This is in conflict of earlier promises that were made on ESO Live about the words in the article linked above.
2. The company hasn't resolved outstanding issues specific to xbox one and the crowns or DLC access under ESP Plus
3. Making any feature exclusive to a subscription with no other options partial or incomplete of the subscription feature is not a win nor is it an intelligent business practice specifically due to earlier statement made by the companies director
4. Anyone with basic economic and marketing knowledge would understand that subscriptions ARE NOT a preferred source of income. Actual cash is a preferred source. All a subscription does is create another study pattern to monitor a customer base. Once you factor in charge-backs, canceled CC, failed charges, customer service costs, etc. its nothing more than another form of payment. thats all it is
5. The real issue if that ZOS refuses to offer meaningful ESO Plus benefits so they've came up with this idea which is going to back-fire around June 20th 2016
Crafting bags would right now open up about 200 item slots in my bank. They're basically an additional bank for crafting mats that gets accessed automatically from any location on all characters without any limit to item slots you can realistically ever reach while the previous existing bank system is limited to 240 item slots and can only be accessed at banker NPCs. Crafting Bags are a feature that completely changes how inventory and bank item management works.
Limiting such an important feature to just subscribers does feel kinda wrong in a B2P game where you also have the option to permanently buy DLCs instead of subscribing. Sure, it's just convenience, you can play the game without Crafting Bags, but this time the convenience factor is so huge, it saves any active crafter/mat farmer a considerable amount of their play time and those who don't have access to it will waste hours on inventory and bank space management every week which they could have saved if they had access to Crafting Bags.
Give ESO+ subscribers better XP, inspiration, and research time bonuses, priority access to Cyrodiil campaigns at population cap, reduced fee when selling something in the guild store, and all this in addition to unlimited access to all DLCs and 1'500 crowns per month! But don't make a system like Crafting Bags which completely changes how inventory and bank space management works exclusive to subscribers.
Hallothiel wrote: »@Necrelios - agree.
Zos need to decide whether this game is sub or not. It sold itself after the revamp as not requiring a sub so maybe that is why some are annoyed. And if you have tried the game & now like crafting, feels a bit like they are pulling a fast one.
And those saying that it helps the business etc - relying on subbing didn't work before so why would it now?
Also subbing is not that usual on consoles - yes I know there are some - but mostly you just buy the game & dlcs etc and that's it. It might not be much but have to pay for PSN & then to sub on top? All adds up when £ can be tight. And there are apparently issues with subbing on consoles.
That's all.
Honestly i have been a ESO+ member since the launch of the game. (paid from beta to B2P then continued to sub) and to be honest, the EXP boost is laughable, the DLC rental is nice BUT if i do not pay my sub it goes bye bye. And the crowns they grant go quick. The crafting bag is a perk that will actually entice people to sub and it is nice.
nope nothing wrong with it, sub for the bag.
Hallothiel wrote: »This whole issue is so devisive it does neither 'side' any favours and frankly some of the attitudes shown leave a bad taste in the mouth. The whole debacle has left me less than enamoured with this game & its players, even more than all the PVE /PVP nerf rubbish that is one of the main whinges.
Same here @Hallothiel ... ZOS' actions (not just this, but others) have made me question the integrity of the future of ESO and the attitudes presented on this thread really makes me question if I want to be participate with this community much longer.
Hmm... ZOS better be thanking the Divines this is a TES game...