Just throwing it out there...the julianos combo is well used and is the best but I'm not into min maxing and have still done all the 4 man dungeons for gold with
4 bahara's curse armour with 2 arch mage/magicka/divine
Nerien'eth helm/magicka/impen
willpower rings necklace arcane/spell damage
Bahara's flame/resto staff / spell crit
all gold (apart from rings and necklace obviously)
Bar one: liquid lightning, pulsar, crushing shock, clannfear, twilight tormentor - greater atronach
Bar two: Empowered ward, daedric prey, power surge,(same two pets) - suppression field
undaunted mettle only 1/2 atm. hp 20k/mag36-37k/stam 11k (with blue lvl15 health/mag food) ...mag regen over 1000 with major sorcery spell damage just 3k
Solo'd plenty dungeons with this setup
It's a good setup that I'm having fun with and helps in dungeons with the high BC proc
DRXHarbinger wrote: »Twice born star. Far better than Julianos.




DRXHarbinger wrote: »Twice born star. Far better than Julianos.
@DRXHarbinger
False, I believe you're omitting the changes made to Elfborn in the TG patch:
Due to changes to Elfborn and skills that increase critical damage, TBS is no longer optimal from a DPS point of view. In the spreadsheets below, I have introduced a new metric called the Combined Metric. This metric was introduced because staff attacks scale differently from abilities. For most abilities 10.5 Max Magicka ~ 1 Spell Damage but for staff attacks 40 Max Magicka ~ 1 Spell Damage. To obtain the Combined Metric, I assume approximately 15% of total dps comes from Heavy (Medium Attacks) and 85% comes from abilities, then the weighted average of the Ability and Attack metric results in the Combined Metric.
We see then that for the Combined Metric on staffs, Law of Julianos is better by about 1.5%. Previously, my calculations showed that Law of Julianos was ~0.5% better than TBS but that was without taking into account the higher Attack Metric. On the dual wield bar, we should use the Ability Metric since no weaves are used and in this situation Julianos is better by around 0.5%.
If you were to replace one magicka enchantment on a large piece in favour of health so that the Health with Julianos and Twice-Born Star are comparable then on the staff bar Julianos is better by 0.1% but worse by 0.1% on the dual wield bar. To help put all these percentage differences into context, my rough calculations suggest that not having Divines on one piece (maybe you have been unlucky and have a bank full of Well-Fitted Molag Kena shoulders/helm) equates to a loss of ~0.5%
I’ve heard of people saying that Twice-Born Star is better with lower CP but I have yet to see extensive calculations that demonstrate this. Using the spreadsheets below, I varied the amount of CP by adjusting both the number of points invested into the Mage Tree and assumed that the first 100 points will be put into Elemental Expert followed by all points (up to 66) into Elfborn. While this CP distribution is not absolutely optimal, it is reasonably close. In this case, even with 100 Mage CP (300 total CP) Julianos is better than Twice-Born Star on the staff bar (0.3%). On the Dual-Wield bar, Julianos outperforms Twice-Born Star at 129 Mage CP (387 total CP)
Note: Ignore the Magicka Recovery and Spell Cost boxes. I was too lazy to move them away before I took the pictures.
Twice-Born Star Staff
Twice-Born Star Dual Wield
Law of Julianos Staff
Law of Julianos Dual Wield
Source:
http://tamrielfoundry.com/topic/pts-2-1-2-sorcerer-arithmagic/
DRXHarbinger wrote: »Twice born star. Far better than Julianos.
@DRXHarbinger
False, I believe you're omitting the changes made to Elfborn in the TG patch:
Due to changes to Elfborn and skills that increase critical damage, TBS is no longer optimal from a DPS point of view. In the spreadsheets below, I have introduced a new metric called the Combined Metric. This metric was introduced because staff attacks scale differently from abilities. For most abilities 10.5 Max Magicka ~ 1 Spell Damage but for staff attacks 40 Max Magicka ~ 1 Spell Damage. To obtain the Combined Metric, I assume approximately 15% of total dps comes from Heavy (Medium Attacks) and 85% comes from abilities, then the weighted average of the Ability and Attack metric results in the Combined Metric.
We see then that for the Combined Metric on staffs, Law of Julianos is better by about 1.5%. Previously, my calculations showed that Law of Julianos was ~0.5% better than TBS but that was without taking into account the higher Attack Metric. On the dual wield bar, we should use the Ability Metric since no weaves are used and in this situation Julianos is better by around 0.5%.
If you were to replace one magicka enchantment on a large piece in favour of health so that the Health with Julianos and Twice-Born Star are comparable then on the staff bar Julianos is better by 0.1% but worse by 0.1% on the dual wield bar. To help put all these percentage differences into context, my rough calculations suggest that not having Divines on one piece (maybe you have been unlucky and have a bank full of Well-Fitted Molag Kena shoulders/helm) equates to a loss of ~0.5%
I’ve heard of people saying that Twice-Born Star is better with lower CP but I have yet to see extensive calculations that demonstrate this. Using the spreadsheets below, I varied the amount of CP by adjusting both the number of points invested into the Mage Tree and assumed that the first 100 points will be put into Elemental Expert followed by all points (up to 66) into Elfborn. While this CP distribution is not absolutely optimal, it is reasonably close. In this case, even with 100 Mage CP (300 total CP) Julianos is better than Twice-Born Star on the staff bar (0.3%). On the Dual-Wield bar, Julianos outperforms Twice-Born Star at 129 Mage CP (387 total CP)
Note: Ignore the Magicka Recovery and Spell Cost boxes. I was too lazy to move them away before I took the pictures.
Twice-Born Star Staff
Twice-Born Star Dual Wield
Law of Julianos Staff
Law of Julianos Dual Wield
Source:
http://tamrielfoundry.com/topic/pts-2-1-2-sorcerer-arithmagic/
KingWhyteboi wrote: »lose the seducer for pve 5 juliannos 2 kena with thief is really strong or you can 5 juliannos rest magnus until you get kena
byrdmanwes wrote: »
Bigger issue I see with all of the "math" he does is how many times he "assumes" with his calculations. Making assumptions when it comes to math mean the math is wrong.....
byrdmanwes wrote: »
Bigger issue I see with all of the "math" he does is how many times he "assumes" with his calculations. Making assumptions when it comes to math mean the math is wrong.....
@byrdmanwes
Bigger issue I see is that you forgot to post your superior, assumption-free calculations.
KingWhyteboi wrote: »lose the seducer for pve 5 juliannos 2 kena with thief is really strong or you can 5 juliannos rest magnus until you get kena