Zernificus wrote: »@Autolycus - Cheers pal. Just never really done sorc DW before so that gives me an idea of where to start. More concerned with hearing from players who enjoy their playstyle rather than being a paragon of efficiency. Laughs > Peak performance oh yeh. Heck I run willows on my bosmer so I can run food + wpn damage enchants - probably a dumb idea but I always try to balance sustain with damage. Like those long skirmish fights in pvp
I think that the stamina-focused sorcerer is the poster model for "just because it can be created does not mean the developers must make it capable in all aspects."
Classes have strengths... And weaknesses. If you sign on to a sorcerer, you are signing on to having strength in magic, AND to having a weakness in stamina. It's called min-maxing. Go for the max in category A and there will be the corresponding min in category B.
You don't see culinary masters crying over being less capable at football, but there are examples of players of sorcerers QQ over being less capable at sword swinging.
bloodenragedb14_ESO wrote: »buff it or do not, just do not mess with the resources the class skills currently use
they are called 'sorcerers' for a reason
This mmo is class based, which means you have a pretty good idea what your getting into just by the name of the class, Sorcerer does not imply a battle hardened warrior able to run for miles without stop, Honestly if that is what pops up when you think of the class sorcerer,i worry for you
if you want to have a stamina based character, then pick a class that is mostly stamina based.
bloodenragedb14_ESO wrote: »buff it or do not, just do not mess with the resources the class skills currently use
they are called 'sorcerers' for a reason
This mmo is class based, which means you have a pretty good idea what your getting into just by the name of the class, Sorcerer does not imply a battle hardened warrior able to run for miles without stop, Honestly if that is what pops up when you think of the class sorcerer,i worry for you
if you want to have a stamina based character, then pick a class that is mostly stamina based.
It might very well be, as Oblivion, being the last class based TES game prior to ESO, portrayed them as Mages with a focus on stamina and heavy armor. And ESO itself claims to allow you to play the way you want. And spells like the initial Bound Armor and Surge support that claim. Doesn't seem far off to think a stamina Sorcerer playstyle would be supported.
I think that the stamina-focused sorcerer is the poster model for "just because it can be created does not mean the developers must make it capable in all aspects."
Classes have strengths... And weaknesses. If you sign on to a sorcerer, you are signing on to having strength in magic, AND to having a weakness in stamina. It's called min-maxing. Go for the max in category A and there will be the corresponding min in category B.
You don't see culinary masters crying over being less capable at football, but there are examples of players of sorcerers QQ over being less capable at sword swinging.
scorpiodog wrote: »All three skill lines for Sorcerors are Magica based, so Stamsorc is basically a class that doesn't use it's major skill lines?
I think that the stamina-focused sorcerer is the poster model for "just because it can be created does not mean the developers must make it capable in all aspects."
Classes have strengths... And weaknesses. If you sign on to a sorcerer, you are signing on to having strength in magic, AND to having a weakness in stamina. It's called min-maxing. Go for the max in category A and there will be the corresponding min in category B.
Stam sorcs do not need a buff. If you think so, then your probably playing one and don't know how to use it or, your trolling.
ZOS knows the class is OP as hell. Stam version is just fine as it is.