dodgehopper_ESO wrote: »hammayolettuce wrote: »Radiant is 100x better than mages fury or impale or executioner. The skill needs to not scale the way it does or go back to being dodgable. There is no reason an execute does so much dmg at 100% health and then scales 2x or more as much dmg in execute range than the other executes.
In pvp all i see on my death log at a minimum is radiant every time. Its hilarious watching templars defend radiant just like they did in 1.6 when it was doing the exact same overpowered broken bs.
*
You are in dreamland. I would expect 99.9999% of Templar magicka builds (Which I'm not currently one of unless you count a level 15 bwb character) would PREFER to have RD be an instant cast execute like every other class gets. Your problem is that you don't know how good you have it as a non Templar. If it is so awesome, go level a Templar up and show us how great your skills are. I highly doubt that the FOTM crowd are abandoning their NB's and Sorcs to go play a Magplar. Lets get real here.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kqo-T9csmiI
Endless Fury and Mage's Wrath both do the same damage on the execute proc. The difference between the morphs is that Fury gives magicka back on killing blow, while Wrath does increased dmg on the AoE portion of the execute proc. The AoE doesn't touch the target, only those around them.2) Swap out endless fury with mages wrath since we're comparing the strength of these executes, being at low health with that mages wrath DoT on you when it explodes is incredibly "OP".
You know, I think ZOS should just allow you dodge radiant, it removed the "spamming" at full health of it, which seems to put a bad taste in peoples mouth, even though that is highly ineffective.
And it makes people use it as an actual execute which I think is what people want? No one really had an issue with this skill before, it honestly hasn't changed much, last patch before the CP changes I still got 1 ticks that were doing like 15k+ damage when they got low health
I feel like Templar is in a brutal place, surely there are better things to focus on?
You can block it, purge it, etc. It does small enough damage i normally just dos through and kill them while they do it.
Of all the things in this game to complain about, this doesn't crack top 20 for me.
I feel like Templar is in a brutal place, surely there are better things to focus on?
You can block it, purge it, etc. It does small enough damage i normally just dos through and kill them while they do it.
Of all the things in this game to complain about, this doesn't crack top 20 for me.
Agreed. And if they are going to touch this skill they should at least do a little extra work to give us a skill we need to satisfy ZOS's intent for templars or providing mobility.
Till then there's other skills/issues to fix.
Agreed. And if they are going to touch this skill they should at least do a little extra work to give us a skill we need to satisfy ZOS's intent for templars or providing mobility.
Till then there's other skills/issues to fix.
Enraged_Tiki_Torch wrote: »Step 1: Throw some Blessed Thistle, Columbine, and Namira's Rot into a pot, stir it up and see what you get.
hammayolettuce wrote: »Radiant is 100x better than mages fury or impale or executioner. The skill needs to not scale the way it does or go back to being dodgable. There is no reason an execute does so much dmg at 100% health and then scales 2x or more as much dmg in execute range than the other executes.
In pvp all i see on my death log at a minimum is radiant every time. Its hilarious watching templars defend radiant just like they did in 1.6 when it was doing the exact same overpowered broken bs.
*
hammayolettuce wrote: »Radiant is 100x better than mages fury or impale or executioner. The skill needs to not scale the way it does or go back to being dodgable. There is no reason an execute does so much dmg at 100% health and then scales 2x or more as much dmg in execute range than the other executes.
In pvp all i see on my death log at a minimum is radiant every time. Its hilarious watching templars defend radiant just like they did in 1.6 when it was doing the exact same overpowered broken bs.
*
Don't even try, Asgari (or Snu). You're just gonna get shouted down.
phillyboy7897 wrote: »its an everyone nerf whenever it lands tho, and won't lead to more temp skills getting blasted left and right
hammayolettuce wrote: »Radiant is 100x better than mages fury or impale or executioner. The skill needs to not scale the way it does or go back to being dodgable. There is no reason an execute does so much dmg at 100% health and then scales 2x or more as much dmg in execute range than the other executes.
In pvp all i see on my death log at a minimum is radiant every time. Its hilarious watching templars defend radiant just like they did in 1.6 when it was doing the exact same overpowered broken bs.
*
Don't even try, Asgari (or Snu). You're just gonna get shouted down.
zerg the thread!!!
hammayolettuce wrote: »Radiant is 100x better than mages fury or impale or executioner. The skill needs to not scale the way it does or go back to being dodgable. There is no reason an execute does so much dmg at 100% health and then scales 2x or more as much dmg in execute range than the other executes.
In pvp all i see on my death log at a minimum is radiant every time. Its hilarious watching templars defend radiant just like they did in 1.6 when it was doing the exact same overpowered broken bs.
*
Don't even try, Asgari (or Snu). You're just gonna get shouted down.
Of the good templars that somehow agree with Jules, do ANY of you let your RD go full duration if you cast it on a high health player - whether because of a laggy weapon swap or them popping shields and healing up?
Go ahead, answer that question, and then come back and talk about how OP the damage is at high health.
hammayolettuce wrote: »Radiant is 100x better than mages fury or impale or executioner. The skill needs to not scale the way it does or go back to being dodgable. There is no reason an execute does so much dmg at 100% health and then scales 2x or more as much dmg in execute range than the other executes.
In pvp all i see on my death log at a minimum is radiant every time. Its hilarious watching templars defend radiant just like they did in 1.6 when it was doing the exact same overpowered broken bs.
*
Don't even try, Asgari (or Snu). You're just gonna get shouted down.
It's not "shouting down" when the people involved are making well reasoned arguments. If you have a counter argument throw it up otherwise you're attempting to derail the debate with nothing to back up your argument. (which is closer to the "shouting down" you referenced.) I have done the math myself, watched Jules videos, read the responses and considered them. Afterwards I still disagreed. In multiple threads we've been debating this, Jules keeps throwing up the same evidence over and over. People keep poking holes in the logic, is it our fault the argument presented is insufficient to change our minds? Hell I don't even play Magplar and NOTHING jules has said or shown has convinced me the argument presented is justified. All I see is a video clearly set up to prove Jules point, and a player who is mad they can't handle a Templar so easily anymore.
The arguments presented were poorly argued. The people in this thread have repeatedly shown in their opinion it's not OP, they've even used numbers thrown up from their opponents to show them they are wrong. ZOS has agreed it's NOT OP. What more do you want? What would satisfy you and get you to change your mind? All the facts in the world don't mean squat if you refuse to properly even consider your opponents arguments. What's the point of a real debate if you aren't willing to consider both sides?
Of the good templars that somehow agree with Jules, do ANY of you let your RD go full duration if you cast it on a high health player - whether because of a laggy weapon swap or them popping shields and healing up?
Go ahead, answer that question, and then come back and talk about how OP the damage is at high health.
A lot of bad templars dont ani-cancel and use radiant at 100%.