Dantonian_Rarstiana wrote: »Man thats lame. Why did they make it still cost 40k?
Dantonian_Rarstiana wrote: »Man thats lame. Why did they make it still cost 40k?
Dantonian_Rarstiana wrote: »Man thats lame. Why did they make it still cost 40k?
I have wondered that myself. Perhaps they did it so people would view the Crown Store Mount Skins as a better option to make the horse look different.
Funny thing is, the White Imperial Horse is now uncommon so it stands out in the game.
Dantonian_Rarstiana wrote: »Man thats lame. Why did they make it still cost 40k?
For some reason, the specs disappeared with one of the updates. I believe what happened is that the expensive mounts came pre-loaded with some upgrades, which was great but meant that over time cheap mounts would catch up...making the cost unwarranted. So ZOS put the superior stats into the basic feature of the mounts. Unfortunately, it means it's hard to compare mounts without racing them.
I can confirm this too. With the same level of speed training my Imperial horse takes a bit longer to get from the wayshrine to the crafting writ drop off site than the Bay horse or the crown store Senche Lioness.
ZOS_GinaBruno wrote:Previously, each mount was associated with a specific set of statistics, which often led to you needing to choose between your preferred mount appearance or a mechanical benefit. Now, you are free to choose any acquired mount you like without compromising statistics.
CLICK!ZOS_GinaBruno wrote:Previously, each mount was associated with a specific set of statistics, which often led to you needing to choose between your preferred mount appearance or a mechanical benefit. Now, you are free to choose any acquired mount you like without compromising statistics.
Two options here:
1. Guys above misscalculated something
2. Something is broken with mounts stats