
I chose option number two, the other options look a bit silly, imo.
infraction2008b16_ESO wrote: »I think the CP rank should be hidden to curb elitism and people only asking for people with 501+ when the content doesn't need it.
NewBlacksmurf wrote: »Why is this even being questioned. Seriously
If ZOS removes VR and goes with anything other than 50, I might be 100% done forever
CrowsDescend wrote: »NewBlacksmurf wrote: »Why is this even being questioned. Seriously
If ZOS removes VR and goes with anything other than 50, I might be 100% done forever
There's no 'if' though, they're most definitely going to remove Veteran Ranks anyway... so it's now a question of "What would replace them?" I guess.
I personally don't like the idea of the 'level cap' being just 50. I'd rather it continue on, based on how many CP's you have, so it would just go on and on, but then of course that would create a separation between those with high CPs and those with low CPs, so... still thinking about that one.
NewBlacksmurf wrote: »CrowsDescend wrote: »NewBlacksmurf wrote: »Why is this even being questioned. Seriously
If ZOS removes VR and goes with anything other than 50, I might be 100% done forever
There's no 'if' though, they're most definitely going to remove Veteran Ranks anyway... so it's now a question of "What would replace them?" I guess.
I personally don't like the idea of the 'level cap' being just 50. I'd rather it continue on, based on how many CP's you have, so it would just go on and on, but then of course that would create a separation between those with high CPs and those with low CPs, so... still thinking about that one.
That's not a question either.
Have you followed ZOS' dialogue on this for the past year +?
Nothing else is replacing VR levels. To remove something is to do away with them.
Now they've suggested initially that CP was to replace VR but later they wrote in it's still on the dev tracker that no CP won't replace VR.
We also now now that when removing VR, some gear requirements are being considered to move from VR to a CP requirement thus why ZOS is also considering another VR to CP conversion but other than that info....this topic isn't asking the questions that should be questioned as we alsready know they aren't planning to display CP because it's been asked umpteen times and they said no.
Why would they now show CP when we all know it's pointless cause PvP scales and all dungeons scale so we are effectively the same levels. In addition we also know that once VR is removed, the non VR campaigns will be non CP campaigns.
I believe these questions were already addressed.
Option 2 is the way to go, but it brings up some questions about the gear people are using.
If gear gets requirements again, then it would be a disaster.
How would I know if I am in a group with a player dressed in Calcinium or Rubedite?
Gear requirements need to go too.
CrowsDescend wrote: »NewBlacksmurf wrote: »CrowsDescend wrote: »NewBlacksmurf wrote: »Why is this even being questioned. Seriously
If ZOS removes VR and goes with anything other than 50, I might be 100% done forever
There's no 'if' though, they're most definitely going to remove Veteran Ranks anyway... so it's now a question of "What would replace them?" I guess.
I personally don't like the idea of the 'level cap' being just 50. I'd rather it continue on, based on how many CP's you have, so it would just go on and on, but then of course that would create a separation between those with high CPs and those with low CPs, so... still thinking about that one.
That's not a question either.
Have you followed ZOS' dialogue on this for the past year +?
Nothing else is replacing VR levels. To remove something is to do away with them.
Now they've suggested initially that CP was to replace VR but later they wrote in it's still on the dev tracker that no CP won't replace VR.
We also now now that when removing VR, some gear requirements are being considered to move from VR to a CP requirement thus why ZOS is also considering another VR to CP conversion but other than that info....this topic isn't asking the questions that should be questioned as we alsready know they aren't planning to display CP because it's been asked umpteen times and they said no.
Why would they now show CP when we all know it's pointless cause PvP scales and all dungeons scale so we are effectively the same levels. In addition we also know that once VR is removed, the non VR campaigns will be non CP campaigns.
I believe these questions were already addressed.
Yeah I agree, but it was because of the.. last(?) ESO Live where they said something about VR ranks being removed is still "in the works" or something along those lines, so... I don't know. Maybe this poll/topic is pointless, but what gave me the idea to ask, was because I think it would be completely dull if everyone was just left at "Level 50" and nothing more. ^^
NewBlacksmurf wrote: »CrowsDescend wrote: »NewBlacksmurf wrote: »CrowsDescend wrote: »NewBlacksmurf wrote: »Why is this even being questioned. Seriously
If ZOS removes VR and goes with anything other than 50, I might be 100% done forever
There's no 'if' though, they're most definitely going to remove Veteran Ranks anyway... so it's now a question of "What would replace them?" I guess.
I personally don't like the idea of the 'level cap' being just 50. I'd rather it continue on, based on how many CP's you have, so it would just go on and on, but then of course that would create a separation between those with high CPs and those with low CPs, so... still thinking about that one.
That's not a question either.
Have you followed ZOS' dialogue on this for the past year +?
Nothing else is replacing VR levels. To remove something is to do away with them.
Now they've suggested initially that CP was to replace VR but later they wrote in it's still on the dev tracker that no CP won't replace VR.
We also now now that when removing VR, some gear requirements are being considered to move from VR to a CP requirement thus why ZOS is also considering another VR to CP conversion but other than that info....this topic isn't asking the questions that should be questioned as we alsready know they aren't planning to display CP because it's been asked umpteen times and they said no.
Why would they now show CP when we all know it's pointless cause PvP scales and all dungeons scale so we are effectively the same levels. In addition we also know that once VR is removed, the non VR campaigns will be non CP campaigns.
I believe these questions were already addressed.
Yeah I agree, but it was because of the.. last(?) ESO Live where they said something about VR ranks being removed is still "in the works" or something along those lines, so... I don't know. Maybe this poll/topic is pointless, but what gave me the idea to ask, was because I think it would be completely dull if everyone was just left at "Level 50" and nothing more. ^^
Hmmmm
So you understand that each CP isn't a level and even every 3 -10 CP isn't a level or VR level right?
Also using 1 or 3 -10 CP doesn't equal a level or VR level.
These are just Passives that depending on how they are used could cause a player to be more effective, more balanced, or even have little change.
There is absolutely no reason to show or identify used or achieved CP's on NPCs or players as it does nothing but further confuse and possibly cause frustrations.
Being 50 isn't at all boring tho. Consider being 50 is a good measuring stick for initial progression and to understand the min stay and skill points someone has.
Players still have skill levels to level up to IV so showing someone as 50 makes perfect sense.
Showing NPCs as levels 50-56 even makes sense but anything more gets pointless and so if they hope to increase the base player levels, then they would need to also build out new skills and progress current skill lines to those new levels.