Update 50 is now available for testing on the PTS! You can read the latest patch notes here: https://forums.elderscrollsonline.com/en/categories/pts
Maintenance for the week of April 20:
• NA megaservers for patch maintenance – April 20, 3:00AM EDT (7:00 UTC) - 12:00PM EDT (16:00 UTC)
• EU megaservers for patch maintenance – April 20, 7:00 UTC (3:00AM EDT) - 17:00 UTC (12:00PM EDT)

DC altadoon scroll run tonight.........

Nutshotz
Nutshotz
✭✭✭✭
Alright, ive been told I have to make sure I word this correctly and safely and so on, but... I will be naming ppl involved in this scroll run and the remaining EP members that stayed behind.

so lets get this started.

last week the pvp guild I run with grabbed 2 scrolls from DC. now let me remind you the game mechanic as soon as they take back either of the gate keeps that the scroll your attempting to capture or they take the anchor (the main) keep of the 3. that you get hit with 1million damage. this happened both times as soon as DC took Glademist. well as a group of AD just took fare, the dc group just picked up the altadoon scroll. so in theory the shields should of activated..... well they did not in result of AD losing the altadoon scroll. now why is it that when we go for an EP/DC scroll and they take back glade or the 2 main gate keeps (DC) or Arrius or the 2 main gate keeps (EP) that AD gets demolished by 1million damage???? are the devs giving EP/DC fav's over AD, cuz I'm starting to think it and tbh its starting to show.

OR

bare with me here, there is an exploit that involves the scroll runner to bypass the gate and not take damage but then what about the other DC/EP players on the altadoon side that were not affected when they were near the gate like AD was when they received the 1million damage.

here is the scroll runner
ec0c8fd6-4e2f-4cb7-88ce-accf511a1e7e.png

and these are the EP players:

{SNIP}


there were others but that is what I got thru my screen shots

I am not naming or shaming I am clearly stating a point on how DC was able to grab the altadoon scroll, and the EP players that stayed to gank and did not receive the 1millon damage once they got near the gate of altadoon, like AD did once they grabbed the scrolls last week from alma ruma and than got demolished from the damage barrier.

[Moderator Note: Edited per our rules on Naming & Shaming]
Edited by ZOS_Racheal on December 14, 2015 4:02AM
  • Master_Kas
    Master_Kas
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    ✭✭
    Your thread will be locked, and you might get a warning/ban on the forums for naming and shaming. You say you're not doing it but it will. So remove the names if you want this thread alive :P

    This also happened on EU Azura a few weeks ago. DC took the ep scroll, we took back kings so gate got closed, we waited for them to get fried, they didnt't.

    We got it back outside the gates but still buggy as hell ^^
    Edited by Master_Kas on December 14, 2015 3:58AM
    EU | PC
  • Morbash
    Morbash
    ✭✭✭✭
    Alright, ive been told I have to make sure I word this correctly and safely and so on, but... I will be naming ppl involved in this scroll run and the remaining EP members that stayed behind.

    so lets get this started.

    last week the pvp guild I run with grabbed 2 scrolls from DC. now let me remind you the game mechanic as soon as they take back either of the gate keeps that the scroll your attempting to capture or they take the anchor (the main) keep of the 3. that you get hit with 1million damage. this happened both times as soon as DC took Glademist. well as a group of AD just took fare, the dc group just picked up the altadoon scroll. so in theory the shields should of activated..... well they did not in result of AD losing the altadoon scroll. now why is it that when we go for an EP/DC scroll and they take back glade or the 2 main gate keeps (DC) or Arrius or the 2 main gate keeps (EP) that AD gets demolished by 1million damage???? are the devs giving EP/DC fav's over AD, cuz I'm starting to think it and tbh its starting to show.

    OR

    bare with me here, there is an exploit that involves the scroll runner to bypass the gate and not take damage but then what about the other DC/EP players on the altadoon side that were not affected when they were near the gate like AD was when they received the 1million damage.

    here is the scroll runner
    ec0c8fd6-4e2f-4cb7-88ce-accf511a1e7e.png

    and these are the EP players:

    {SNIP}

    there were others but that is what I got thru my screen shots

    I am not naming or shaming I am clearly stating a point on how DC was able to grab the altadoon scroll, and the EP players that stayed to gank and did not receive the 1millon damage once they got near the gate of altadoon, like AD did once they grabbed the scrolls last week from alma ruma and than got demolished from the damage barrier.

    You listed their names and are basically accusing them of exploiting. How is that not naming and shaming? You can still state your point without listing the names. Also, bugs should be reported in-game by using the /bug command in chat.

    [Moderator Note: Edited quote to match moderated version]
    Edited by ZOS_Racheal on December 14, 2015 4:05AM
    "War doesn't build character; it reveals it."
  • Nutshotz
    Nutshotz
    ✭✭✭✭
    wouldn't be the 1st time ive gotten a warning or a 3day ban from the forums. I'm just clearly stating a point. if I was naming and shaming it would be a totally different subject,
  • ZOS_Racheal
    ZOS_Racheal
    ✭✭✭
    Greeting everyone,

    If you find a game mechanic which you believe is not working as intended, and appears to give an advantage, you should report it and not publicly post it. We do not allow discussions of potential exploits or cheats, even if the player names are blocked out. As such, we have closed this thread.Thank you for your understanding, and please keep the Community Rules in mind when posting on the forums.
    The Elder Scrolls Online: Tamriel Unlimited Moderation Team - ZeniMax Online Studios
    Facebook | Twitter | Google+ | Tumblr | Pinterest | YouTube | ESO Knowledge Base
    Staff Post
This discussion has been closed.