Solo PVP NAO.

Don't care for PvP. I'd rather they focus resources elsewhere and stop nerfing everybody just for PvP.

Will get a real mixed plate in General Disc, Hero. I think most people do want Cyro - but a functional cyro. Today its still suffering performance issues. More than that though, you either jump in the ball groups or youre amongst a disorganized zerg being mowed down by a ball group eventually. And performance sucks ass all the way through.

1) I think focusing on addressing balance of ball groups which can be acheived through a few changes like aoe caps, revisit dynamic ult gen, rework defensive strengths like uncapped purge/barrier.

2) Longer term is reworking priorities in Cyro to break up the single front action where everyone is colliding on the same battles. Everyone is on a track to clash around the inner ring.

FENGRUSH wrote: »

Will get a real mixed plate in General Disc, Hero. I think most people do want Cyro - but a functional cyro. Today its still suffering performance issues. More than that though, you either jump in the ball groups or youre amongst a disorganized zerg being mowed down by a ball group eventually. And performance sucks ass all the way through.

1) I think focusing on addressing balance of ball groups which can be acheived through a few changes like aoe caps, revisit dynamic ult gen, rework defensive strengths like uncapped purge/barrier.

2) Longer term is reworking priorities in Cyro to break up the single front action where everyone is colliding on the same battles. Everyone is on a track to clash around the inner ring.

Yeah, I kinda agree, but the thing I like(d) about the districts was the small feel of the area. I enjoy the large scale battles (let's just pretend they're working) but most of the time I would rather PvP in a smaller area.
So, by all means make Cyro work, but what would the harm be in giving us a tiny map to PvP in with no significant gains?

Forestd16b14_ESO wrote: »

Oh look yet another thread for like the 100th time about arenas.

Post up all 100 and I'll include them =3, tried to tag some of the larger discussions arenas previously had, notice the small reply count compared to PVE topics? We don't seem to support it as a whole, just as a fleeting idea.

Jitterbug wrote: »

Aeula wrote: »

Don't care for PvP. I'd rather they focus resources elsewhere and stop nerfing everybody just for PvP.

Pay roll is already writing checks to some people on the PvP team - I don't think you'll mist out on anything by them also doing their jobs.
As to the nerfs/buffs, those will happen regardless.

They can disband the PvP team and reallocate resources if they want to. Assigning someone to the PvP team means you didn't assign them elsewhere. So, yes, the previous poster does mist [sic] out. ZOS has a budget and there are opportunity costs for any allocation decisions.

Regarding nerfs, you answer is disingenuous. PvE people aren't complaining about skills, begging for rebalancing. Get rid of PvP and we will see pretty static skills.

Wollust wrote: »

I don't see any reason to add more content to PvP if the current Pvp (Cyrodiil) is not even working because of lag and fps drops.

I link your logic is inverted.

The lag is due to the large scale. If you add small scale PvP, it won't have the lag.

Don't be confused. Adding more PvP is NOT adding "more content to PvP" as the other forms of PvP would likely run on separate servers. The only way this makes lag worse in Cyrodiil is if offloading the small-scale fans leads to larger group battles in Cyrodiil.

Adding small scale PvP like this will not change how the large scale world is, nor fix it, as it will still be the favored PvP option for farming points / rewards / etc. At best, it would just drag more PvE players or RP folks to 'duels'.

Forestd16b14_ESO wrote: »

HeroOfNone wrote: »

Forestd16b14_ESO wrote: »

Oh look yet another thread for like the 100th time about arenas.

Post up all 100 and I'll include them =3, tried to tag some of the larger discussions arenas previously had, notice the small reply count compared to PVE topics? We don't seem to support it as a whole, just as a fleeting idea.

That's my point the community my self included want a PvP arena but ZOS mainly #Wheebler hates them for some reason.

My point is that we keep making comments like this, "the community my self included want a PvP arena" has LOW support compared to PVE and other topics. Find me a link I didn't include regarding small scale PVE specifically and let's look at the post count or vote counts. This is how managers decide where to allocate resources, based on what ideas have the most hype with paying players.

1v1 3v3 5v5 no bgs needed. they will zerg in BGs like they does outside.

DenMoria wrote: »

No PvP at all.

Ganking is for morally lacking players.

Some folks are just filled with DETERMINATION, and others just like having a bad time...

Solo PvP would wreak havoc on Large Scale. And Large Scale would wreak havoc on solo. The Devs would spend so much of their time bouncing between balancing for the two it would inevitably break what balance we do have.

Im fine with 4v4v4 or 12v12v12 as it might actually work out that balance can be achieved without harming either playstyle too much. But this games PvPs core is Large Scale and that should never bend to the will of an even smaller demographic within an already small demographic.

Some kind of open world/justice system/enforcer pvp would be incredible as well!