Maintenance for the week of April 6:
• PC/Mac: No maintenance – April 6
• PC/Mac: No maintenance – April 6
ESO+ Members Should Get to Jump Ahead of Non-ESO+ Members in the PvP Queue
MikeB
✭✭✭✭✭
One of the benefits of ESO+ should be that you get to jump ahead of non-ESO+ members in the PvP queue. Those that pay the monthly sub should get honest benefits in this game. The current "benefits" we get with ESO+ is not close to being enough.
Edited by MikeB on September 23, 2015 1:08PM ESO+ Members Should Get to Jump Ahead of Non-ESO+ Members in the PvP Queue 304 votes
Yes
50%
154 votes
No
44%
136 votes
Other
4%
14 votes
2
-
JD2013✭✭✭✭✭
✭✭✭✭✭NoAnd I say this as an ESO Plus member.Sweetrolls for all!
Christophe Mottierre - Breton Templar with his own whole darn estate! Templar Houses are so 2015. EU DC
PC Beta Tester January 2014
Elder of The Black
Order of Sithis
The Runners
@TamrielTraverse - For Tamriel related Twitter shenanigans!
https://tamrieltraveller.wordpress.com/
Crafting bag OP! ZOS nerf pls!8 -
anitajoneb17_ESO✭✭✭✭✭
✭✭✭✭✭NoVoted "No" because I don't have ESO+.
This poll will reflect quite exactly how many of us are subscribed or not. Nothing more.2 -
Leandor✭✭✭✭✭
✭✭I hate to be that one, but I'll do it anyways for ships and giggles:
P2W!!!!!1111eleventyone1 -
terrordactyl1971✭✭✭✭YesI kinda agree.
I know in Battlefield 4 that premium members get the jump on queues, that works well. There really should be a queue advantage if you are investing $10 per month into the franchise2 -
Gidorick✭✭✭✭✭
✭✭✭✭✭YesYep... and I don't have ESO+. In fact, this was one of my suggestions in this thread: http://forums.elderscrollsonline.com/en/discussion/150450/eso-subscription-benefits-suggestions/p1What ESO really needs is an Auction Horse.
That's right... Horse.
Click HERE to discuss.
Want more crazy ideas? Check out my Concept Repository!0 -
MikeB✭✭✭✭✭YesI hate to be that one, but I'll do it anyways for ships and giggles:
P2W!!!!!1111eleventyone
How is it pay to win? Several other games do this already. If you pay the monthly sub you should get an actual benefit. How easy it is to make false claims on the internet. It is in no way pay 2 win.Edited by MikeB on September 23, 2015 1:14PM2 -
Leandor✭✭✭✭✭
✭✭
And off it goes *queue evil maniac laugh and finger to the teeth*I hate to be that one, but I'll do it anyways for ships and giggles:
P2W!!!!!1111eleventyone
How is it pay to win? Several other games do this already. If you pay the monthly sub you should get an actual benefit. How easy it is to make false claims on the internet. It is in no way pay 2 win.0 -
Mickey_Ox✭✭✭✭NoEso+ member here and its a no from me, while this system works well in F2P models it wont translate well to B2P games as non ESO+ members have paid the same money for the game as myself , so why should they have to queue for a game they paid for when i dont. Its everyone queues or nobody does.Ever Tried, Ever Failed,
No Matter.
Try again, Fail again,
Fail Better5 -
MikeB✭✭✭✭✭Yes
And off it goes *queue evil maniac laugh and finger to the teeth*I hate to be that one, but I'll do it anyways for ships and giggles:
P2W!!!!!1111eleventyone
How is it pay to win? Several other games do this already. If you pay the monthly sub you should get an actual benefit. How easy it is to make false claims on the internet. It is in no way pay 2 win.
Thats what I thought. Troll elsewhere. This is why we cant have an honest discussion about this game on these forums0 -
MikeB✭✭✭✭✭YesEso+ member here and its a no from me, while this system works well in F2P models it wont translate well to B2P games as non ESO+ members have paid the same money for the game as myself , so why should they have to queue for a game they paid for when i dont. Its everyone queues or nobody does.
As already mentioned several other B2P games already have a system like this. Where those that pay for the "premium" service get to jump ahead in game queue and hundreds of thousands, if not millions, of people buy and play those game, i.e Battlefield as mentioned above is one.0 -
Rosveen✭✭✭✭✭
✭✭✭✭YesOf course. Subscribers should always have priority in access queues. One could make a case for similar privilege after spending X crowns in the crown store while not being susbscribed, but whatever the outcome of this discussion would be, it doesn't change the answer to the original question.0 -
Artfuldodger✭✭✭I would have no problem with eso plus members being given priority, I do not have eso plus either.Me? I'm dishonest, and a dishonest man you can always trust to be dishonest. Honestly. It's the honest ones you want to watch out for, because you can never predict when they're going to do something incredibly... stupid.
-Johnny Depp0 -
terrordactyl1971✭✭✭✭YesMaybe not a full queue jump, but let in 2 ESO+, then 1 non ESO+ and so on
As it is, ESO+ is little more than purchasing 1500 crowns with a slight XP bump0 -
MikeB✭✭✭✭✭YesOne could make a case for similar privilege after spending X crowns in the crown store while not being susbscribed, but whatever the outcome of this discussion would be, it doesn't change the answer to the original question.
Thats a good suggestion. You could get the same benefit per month if you spend 1500 or more crowns in the crown store per month.
0 -
JD2013✭✭✭✭✭
✭✭✭✭✭NoAnd I say this as an ESO Plus member.
Certainly.
Whilst I agree that ESO + members could certainly do with some extra perks, I don't feel that this should be one. People are already starting to shout about how they think that this game is becoming pay to win, and this would be another notch on the slippery road towards such things.
Priority queuing would be a bad idea. Things like a crafting bag? Better idea.Sweetrolls for all!
Christophe Mottierre - Breton Templar with his own whole darn estate! Templar Houses are so 2015. EU DC
PC Beta Tester January 2014
Elder of The Black
Order of Sithis
The Runners
@TamrielTraverse - For Tamriel related Twitter shenanigans!
https://tamrieltraveller.wordpress.com/
Crafting bag OP! ZOS nerf pls!2 -
lolo_01b16_ESO✭✭✭✭✭
✭✭How would you handle the group queue?
Do you skip the queue if the leader has eso+, if the majority of the group has eso+ or only if everyone has eso+?2 -
Pangnirtung✭✭✭✭✭NoSo if I buy the DLC being a non plus member I should still be put behind the queue? Baloney.5
-
terrordactyl1971✭✭✭✭Yeslolo_01b16_ESO wrote: »How would you handle the group queue?
Do you skip the queue if the leader has eso+, if the majority of the group has eso+ or only if everyone has eso+?
2 separate queues. Let in 2 from the ESO+ queue, then 1 from the none ESO+ queue and repeat the cycle etc
1 -
phairdon✭✭✭✭✭
✭✭NoNo. Because anyone without a subscription had to purchase IC through the crown store.Your immersion is breaking my entitlement. Buff Sorc's. Darkshroud the cremator Death by furRubeus BlackFluffy knight BladesThe Fat PantherPsijic Fungal SausageFlesheater the VileCaspian Rafferty FernsbyArchfiend Warlock PiersThe Black BishopEvil Wizard Lizard (EU)Neberra Vestige Fajeon (EU)Salanis Deathstick (EU)Blood Mage Alchemist (EU)1 -
MikeB✭✭✭✭✭Yeslolo_01b16_ESO wrote: »How would you handle the group queue?
Do you skip the queue if the leader has eso+, if the majority of the group has eso+ or only if everyone has eso+?
I would say a majority would have to have ESO+. Certainly not just the leader as that will be abused and not everyone because that would leave someone people without being able to queue with some friends.0 -
Leandor✭✭✭✭✭
✭✭
While you could certainly think of my previous comments as trolling, it is in reality only a statement of how ridiculous I think this proposal is.
Thats what I thought. Troll elsewhere. This is why we cant have an honest discussion about this game on these forums
And off it goes *queue evil maniac laugh and finger to the teeth*
How is it pay to win? Several other games do this already. If you pay the monthly sub you should get an actual benefit. How easy it is to make false claims on the internet. It is in no way pay 2 win.I hate to be that one, but I'll do it anyways for ships and giggles:
P2W!!!!!1111eleventyone
Since subscriptions are self-renewing, I am very sure the majority of those that play in Cyrodiil and IC are subscribers, so this priority queue would safe you nothing substantial.
Since this game has to be financed somehow, and sales in crown store contribute much more to that than subscription, implementing this would be a nonsense business decision.
I was too lazy to type that out and feel it is pointless to try and argue (to use the buzz-word: entitlement).0 -
myrrrorb14_ESO✭✭✭✭✭NoDont see a real reason to do this. Investing $60 into the game should let people have equal access. Paying $30 for DLC should give equal access. Subbing is just putting yourself on a budget where others pay as they go.3
-
Wreuntzylla✭✭✭✭✭
✭✭Yesterrordactyl1971 wrote: »lolo_01b16_ESO wrote: »How would you handle the group queue?
Do you skip the queue if the leader has eso+, if the majority of the group has eso+ or only if everyone has eso+?
2 separate queues. Let in 2 from the ESO+ queue, then 1 from the none ESO+ queue and repeat the cycle etc
Avoids queue priority being thrown in non-member faces.0 -
Slurg✭✭✭✭✭
✭✭NoGo tell those people who spend more on crown packages per month than you do on your sub that you deserve to have priority access over them while spending less. See how that goes over.Happy All the Holidays To You and Yours!
Remembering better days of less RNG in all the things.4 -
anitajoneb17_ESO✭✭✭✭✭
✭✭✭✭✭NoSince subscriptions are self-renewing, I am very sure the majority of those that play in Cyrodiil and IC are subscribers, so this priority queue would safe you nothing substantial.
I fail to see the cause=>effect link between subs being self-renewable and PvP players being subscribed.sales in crown store contribute much more to that than subscription
What and how do you know about that ? Pure speculation imho.
Edited by anitajoneb17_ESO on September 23, 2015 1:33PM0 -
Turelus✭✭✭✭✭
✭✭✭✭✭NoWe want to keep the game accessible and viable to many, not start divides in the community.
You sub if you support the game, simple as that.@Turelus - EU PC Megaserver
"Don't count on others for help. In the end each of us is in this alone. The survivors are those who know how to look out for themselves."2 -
MikeB✭✭✭✭✭Yes
While you could certainly think of my previous comments as trolling, it is in reality only a statement of how ridiculous I think this proposal is.
Thats what I thought. Troll elsewhere. This is why we cant have an honest discussion about this game on these forums
And off it goes *queue evil maniac laugh and finger to the teeth*
How is it pay to win? Several other games do this already. If you pay the monthly sub you should get an actual benefit. How easy it is to make false claims on the internet. It is in no way pay 2 win.I hate to be that one, but I'll do it anyways for ships and giggles:
P2W!!!!!1111eleventyone
Since subscriptions are self-renewing, I am very sure the majority of those that play in Cyrodiil and IC are subscribers, so this priority queue would safe you nothing substantial.
Since this game has to be financed somehow, and sales in crown store contribute much more to that than subscription, implementing this would be a nonsense business decision.
I was too lazy to type that out and feel it is pointless to try and argue (to use the buzz-word: entitlement).
Getting sick of the word entitlement being thrown around just because someone wants something out of the money they spend. I dont have ESO+, I canceled it after 3 months, One because you're lucky if you get the 1500 crowns promised and it takes weeks and more work than its worth to get them if not auto-issued with your monthly renewal, Two the benefits they do give with ESO+ arent even close to being enough for the $15 a month sub fee for console.0
