Yes but you are saying that all nords laugh at the cold. What if my nord grew up raised by High Elves that ended up warming up to him and teaching him magic. By growing up in summer set he wouldn't be cold resistant and if he became more attuned to magic at young age wouldn't he be better than a nord picking it up at the age of 30+?
You can't say "this isn't real life and they do not have science or those classifications in TES" while simultaneously trying to apply real life definitions of racism. Sorry, but you don't get to have it both ways. You've just completely invalidated every single post you've made in this thread.That's not an accurate definition of race. Or rather, it's an incomplete definition of race. It goes family > genus > species > subspecies > race, although race really only applies to humans - in other species it would more commonly be referred to as breed.Part of the issue is that it's actually not very accurate to call the different races of TES "different races" as many of them are actually different species.
In fact, you could even argue that all of them are different species, as through various means (including magical) even those that could be considered different races of the same species (like all of the mer races) have diverged enough that they can't truly be considered the same species anymore. I mean look at the differences between *** sapiens and *** neanderthalensis. I'd say they're probably less divergent than bosmer and orsimer...
Edit: apparently the scientific classification of various hominids gets automatically censored by the forums. I'm talking about the 2 species commonly known as modern humans, and neanderthals, respectively.
Race- as a social construct is a group of people who share similar and distinct physical characteristics
definition again provided by google soooo yep ZoS is making people racist #confirmed
Still the fact that I'm trying to get at is that a khajiit can still be a skilled mage and a redguard can be really bulky and not just good with a sword.
If you accept that at a minimum some of the different "races" in TES are actually different species (and frankly, you have to accept that, because it's completely undeniable that argonians are a different species from khajiit are a different species from mer are a different species from men - the only ones that you could argue are part of the same species are the different mer, and the different men - but even they are definitely different species from each other), then it makes perfect sense that one species will be better than another at some things, because that's exactly what happens.
As an example, neanderthals were physically superior to humans in virtually every respect, with the exception that humans were better at vocalization and long distance running. So if they were 2 races you could play in ESO, neanderthals would probably get bonuses to health, and maybe weapon damage, while humans would probably get a reduction in stamina cost of sprinting, and maybe some magicka bonus (the fact that humans were physically better equipped for vocalization is likely to have allowed us to form languages more easily, which would lead to better development of abstract thought and higher brain functions, despite our smaller brains compared to neanderthals).
This isn't real life and they do not have science or those classifications in TES. Honestly they are still a race of people. Now in terms of being better at something due to sheer genetics I don't believe that is always the case as there are always genetic mutations. Perhaps a khajiit that is crazy good with spells or a high elf with the strength of 10 men? All I'm saying is even from the scientific stand not every person/race/species in TES would have the exact same bonuses.
corrosivechains wrote: »I think the OP is racist.
Because it's also down to lore, a huge part of elder scrolls games, take nords, their passives give them bonuses to defence, to health and reduced frost damage, as they came from the mountains, and are generally huge men battle hardened and have great psychical strength.
Now take redguards, devout warriors that train immensely hard to perfect their sword skills, especially the sword singers of time gone past.
Now why would a nord, a race built like tanks, towering mountains of men that usually wield giant axes to smash their foes to pieces. Be better practitioners of magika than say, dunmers? A race that has spent generations using magika to increase their life spans, and it a huge part of their race.
Not all passives work out in lore, but most do, that's why imperials get health and stam bonuses, as they are trained soldiers that have perfected the art of combat.
Yes but you are saying that all nords laugh at the cold. What if my nord grew up raised by High Elves that ended up warming up to him and teaching him magic. By growing up in summer set he wouldn't be cold resistant and if he became more attuned to magic at young age wouldn't he be better than a nord picking it up at the age of 30+?
No, because that's not how it works. A Nord is born a Nord.
Part of the issue is that it's actually not very accurate to call the different races of TES "different races" as many of them are actually different species.
In fact, you could even argue that all of them are different species, as through various means (including magical) even those that could be considered different races of the same species (like all of the mer races) have diverged enough that they can't truly be considered the same species anymore. I mean look at the differences between *** sapiens and *** neanderthalensis. I'd say they're probably less divergent than bosmer and orsimer...
Edit: apparently the scientific classification of various hominids gets automatically censored by the forums. I'm talking about the 2 species commonly known as modern humans, and neanderthals, respectively.
Tullius & I drive a Vampire Daedric Sword through your rebellious heart.GreenSoup2HoT wrote: »Stormcloak master race, i should of rolled a Nord... i'm Imperial for the passive's but Nord at heart.
Okay so if we do have scientific classifications it doesn't even matter just based on definition. Also they use the same words as us in most cases it is the best approximation for what it is. No one in test has ever said "Damn what a racist pig" to mean "Dang that girl be fiiiiiiine" lol
That's not an accurate definition of race. Or rather, it's an incomplete definition of race. It goes family > genus > species > subspecies > race, although race really only applies to humans - in other species it would more commonly be referred to as breed.Part of the issue is that it's actually not very accurate to call the different races of TES "different races" as many of them are actually different species.
In fact, you could even argue that all of them are different species, as through various means (including magical) even those that could be considered different races of the same species (like all of the mer races) have diverged enough that they can't truly be considered the same species anymore. I mean look at the differences between *** sapiens and *** neanderthalensis. I'd say they're probably less divergent than bosmer and orsimer...
Edit: apparently the scientific classification of various hominids gets automatically censored by the forums. I'm talking about the 2 species commonly known as modern humans, and neanderthals, respectively.
Race- as a social construct is a group of people who share similar and distinct physical characteristics
definition again provided by google soooo yep ZoS is making people racist #confirmed
Still the fact that I'm trying to get at is that a khajiit can still be a skilled mage and a redguard can be really bulky and not just good with a sword.
If you accept that at a minimum some of the different "races" in TES are actually different species (and frankly, you have to accept that, because it's completely undeniable that argonians are a different species from khajiit are a different species from mer are a different species from men - the only ones that you could argue are part of the same species are the different mer, and the different men - but even they are definitely different species from each other), then it makes perfect sense that one species will be better than another at some things, because that's exactly what happens.
As an example, neanderthals were physically superior to humans in virtually every respect, with the exception that humans were better at vocalization and long distance running. So if they were 2 races you could play in ESO, neanderthals would probably get bonuses to health, and maybe weapon damage, while humans would probably get a reduction in stamina cost of sprinting, and maybe some magicka bonus (the fact that humans were physically better equipped for vocalization is likely to have allowed us to form languages more easily, which would lead to better development of abstract thought and higher brain functions, despite our smaller brains compared to neanderthals).
No it can't, that's my point, it's not just something that's taught, a race that's spent thousands of years perfecting a set skill isn't going to pass that information on in a couple of years, kind of like how even though the moth priests trained the prophet in reading the scrolls, he still didn't posses the true skills and ended up blind.
Same as how a nord raised by aragonians isn't going to grow a tail and get resistance to poison now is he?
corrosivechains wrote: »I think the OP is racist.
Yes but you are saying that all nords laugh at the cold. What if my nord grew up raised by High Elves that ended up warming up to him and teaching him magic. By growing up in summer set he wouldn't be cold resistant and if he became more attuned to magic at young age wouldn't he be better than a nord picking it up at the age of 30+?
No, because that's not how it works. A Nord is born a Nord.
Or a nord is born a nord his parents are enslaved and he is sold to a wizard at a young age who trained him in magic.
SeptimusDova wrote: »Nords are trained by Nords. In the past they were trained by dragons. In the future maybe they will be advised by dragons.
Nords do not like magic.
OP do not rip apart the lore that took decades to write just to satisfy your petty desires.
Well I started off by googling the definition of racism and here it is:
Racism- the belief that all members of each race possess characteristics or abilities specific to that race, especially so as to distinguish it as inferior or superior to another race or races.
So the fact that every single Redguard in the game is a competent stamina user, but is considered a lightweight to a High Elf when it comes to magic and vice versa. In the end ZoS has made everyone a racist because everyone knows now that certain races are weaker than others simply because the way they look.
Now I know that is all kind of a "This guy is just trolling" kind of argument, but it brings up the fact that the defense that certain races should be good at certain things doesn't hold up. The fact is we should be able to choose our racial passives as we create our characters and respec them at a shrine. From many different perspectives this is good as a roleplayer may be playing a shadow scale so they take Wood Elf passives or a competitive player can be a Khajiit but with high elf passives so that they are not limited to having their character look a certain way.
All I'm asking is that ZoS allows indviduals to choose everything about the character from look to stats.
