starkerealm wrote: »
And I'm on the PC, and I've barely cracked 100. And my alt is on the XB1, and doesn't even have that. But then again, I quickly figured out I didn't want to play on the XB1.
starkerealm wrote: »Funkopotamus wrote: »Leep. bro I have to say I went to bed about 12 hours ago and I see you are STILL championing the PC master race resistance. I salute you sir.
It's not much of a resistance when all he's doing is crying and demanding the world change so that he can be upset about something.
EDIT: Of course, at this point, I'm also relatively certain he's about 13. So... eh.
FireCowCommando wrote: »Lee, people will agree with you that it WAS unfair for the first two months maybe? But now? At this point you are screaming about a house being on fire, when it is already put out.
There are more people who caught up to the transfers then the 300+ Transfer CP whales you are taking about.
Just to be safe: Its an old, outdated issue.
leepalmer95 wrote: »But you see i never said anything about the world changing
leepalmer95 wrote: »A casual pc xfer has 200-300 cp before xfering because they had a 1 year advantage.
starkerealm wrote: »leepalmer95 wrote: »But you see i never said anything about the world changing
So, you're saying you never said this?leepalmer95 wrote: »A casual pc xfer has 200-300 cp before xfering because they had a 1 year advantage.
Because that's expecting the world to be fundamentally different from how it actually is for the purposes of your tantrum. It's not you're wrong, or confused, you're just lying. You know the truth, but instead you're just throwing this same tantrum today that you were last night. Frankly, it's embarrassing to watch.
starkerealm wrote: »leepalmer95 wrote: »But you see i never said anything about the world changing
So, you're saying you never said this?leepalmer95 wrote: »A casual pc xfer has 200-300 cp before xfering because they had a 1 year advantage.
Because that's expecting the world to be fundamentally different from how it actually is for the purposes of your tantrum. It's not you're wrong, or confused, you're just lying. You know the truth, but instead you're just throwing this same tantrum today that you were last night. Frankly, it's embarrassing to watch.
leepalmer95 wrote: »Your literally making no sense? again how would you know how much cp an average xfer had?
starkerealm wrote: »leepalmer95 wrote: »Your literally making no sense? again how would you know how much cp an average xfer had?
Because, unlike you, I actually play on the PC and know roughly where the hard core and casual players are really at for CP and time investment.
starkerealm wrote: »leepalmer95 wrote: »You sure?
Yes.
leepalmer95 wrote: »starkerealm wrote: »leepalmer95 wrote: »You sure?
Yes.
Gg response, it seems your in a bit of a bind and don't know what to say and can't think of anymore useless stuff at the moment, shall i give you 30 mins so you can google some more big words and re-arrange your 'l2p' answer again?
Or have you just given up?
Still waiting for these reasons?
leepalmer95 wrote: »starkerealm wrote: »leepalmer95 wrote: »You sure?
Yes.
Gg response, it seems your in a bit of a bind
leepalmer95 wrote: »and don't know what to say and can't think of anymore useless stuff at the moment, shall i give you 30 mins so you can google some more big words and re-arrange your 'l2p' answer again?
leepalmer95 wrote: »Or have you just given up?
leepalmer95 wrote: »Still waiting for these reasons?
FireCowCommando wrote: »leepalmer95 wrote: »starkerealm wrote: »leepalmer95 wrote: »You sure?
Yes.
Gg response, it seems your in a bit of a bind and don't know what to say and can't think of anymore useless stuff at the moment, shall i give you 30 mins so you can google some more big words and re-arrange your 'l2p' answer again?
Or have you just given up?
Still waiting for these reasons?
Lee has a solid strategy that never fail's, yell the loudest, and the longest, and you win.
You win lee. You win.
starkerealm wrote: »leepalmer95 wrote: »starkerealm wrote: »leepalmer95 wrote: »You sure?
Yes.
Gg response, it seems your in a bit of a bind
Not really.leepalmer95 wrote: »and don't know what to say and can't think of anymore useless stuff at the moment, shall i give you 30 mins so you can google some more big words and re-arrange your 'l2p' answer again?
No, "learn to play" sums it up succinctly. Why would I need google for this thread?leepalmer95 wrote: »Or have you just given up?
In order for there to be meaningful debate, both parties need to be able to bring an evidenced argument to the table. Understand their opponent's position, respond to, or refute their evidence, and present a coherent, logical abstract.
I've come to the realization that every single point above is far beyond your abilities.leepalmer95 wrote: »Still waiting for these reasons?
No, I do understand you can't, and I respect that... you know, a little.
leepalmer95 wrote: »starkerealm wrote: »leepalmer95 wrote: »starkerealm wrote: »leepalmer95 wrote: »You sure?
Yes.
Gg response, it seems your in a bit of a bind
Not really.leepalmer95 wrote: »and don't know what to say and can't think of anymore useless stuff at the moment, shall i give you 30 mins so you can google some more big words and re-arrange your 'l2p' answer again?
No, "learn to play" sums it up succinctly. Why would I need google for this thread?leepalmer95 wrote: »Or have you just given up?
In order for there to be meaningful debate, both parties need to be able to bring an evidenced argument to the table. Understand their opponent's position, respond to, or refute their evidence, and present a coherent, logical abstract.
I've come to the realization that every single point above is far beyond your abilities.leepalmer95 wrote: »Still waiting for these reasons?
No, I do understand you can't, and I respect that... you know, a little.
So in other works, in recognition that you don't have any argument at all and the fact you can't dispute mine your just going to ignore everything altogether and pretend to yourself that it's not a debate because you know numbers don't mean anything.
Ok, good talk, next time you decide to try and join in on a thread try and at least make sure you have the game on that platform first, it's a lot better if your not talking out of your ass.
Pc elitism at it's finest.
FireCowCommando wrote: »leepalmer95 wrote: »starkerealm wrote: »leepalmer95 wrote: »starkerealm wrote: »leepalmer95 wrote: »You sure?
Yes.
Gg response, it seems your in a bit of a bind
Not really.leepalmer95 wrote: »and don't know what to say and can't think of anymore useless stuff at the moment, shall i give you 30 mins so you can google some more big words and re-arrange your 'l2p' answer again?
No, "learn to play" sums it up succinctly. Why would I need google for this thread?leepalmer95 wrote: »Or have you just given up?
In order for there to be meaningful debate, both parties need to be able to bring an evidenced argument to the table. Understand their opponent's position, respond to, or refute their evidence, and present a coherent, logical abstract.
I've come to the realization that every single point above is far beyond your abilities.leepalmer95 wrote: »Still waiting for these reasons?
No, I do understand you can't, and I respect that... you know, a little.
So in other works, in recognition that you don't have any argument at all and the fact you can't dispute mine your just going to ignore everything altogether and pretend to yourself that it's not a debate because you know numbers don't mean anything.
Ok, good talk, next time you decide to try and join in on a thread try and at least make sure you have the game on that platform first, it's a lot better if your not talking out of your ass.
Pc elitism at it's finest.
Arrogance at its finest.