Okay. Let's have a theoretical here.
Imagine that the sub was still mandatory to play. How would that be any different to having a sub to access it now? If you lapsed your sub if it was mandatory, you wouldn't get to play it. Same applies here.
But now you can buy it with crowns that you get if you sub, crown packs if you don't. Either way you have to pay just as you would have had to pay if the sub was still mandatory.
This is a special case, and squarely puts Zenimax into the same corporate sludgepile as EA and SOE as of this announcement.
Celestrael wrote: »Not even trolling, I'm being honest. They've been a drag since I started playing and following the forums/following ESO on Facebook. No one wants all their negativity, especially when you have a huge influx of new players who are enjoying the game and are generally hopeful about the directions of things. It's like digging a fresh well and having someone coming from the rundown town next to yours and poisoning it with the same mess that's in their well. Get out of my well!
when you have been tricked and cheated on all the time to pay a sub for 13 months with only craglorn as an expension wich you guys on those fu... consoles got for FREE!!! , when the next expension that was announced duriing BETA in march 2014 as stuff not ready to be at the release but soon after, just to be charged 15 months later again for it - you would be pissed too...
Celestrael wrote: »Not even trolling, I'm being honest. They've been a drag since I started playing and following the forums/following ESO on Facebook. No one wants all their negativity, especially when you have a huge influx of new players who are enjoying the game and are generally hopeful about the directions of things. It's like digging a fresh well then someone comes from the rundown town next to yours and poisons it with the same mess that's in their well. Get out of my well!

theroyalestpythonnub18_ESO wrote: »People will pay 30$ for a blue horse, but 25$ for actual content is an outrage
Can I just clarify, I subscribe monthly to ESO upon PC - can I therefore access the DLC without additional payment? Or not?
Except IC was ANNOUNCED last summer and was clearly stated by ZOS to be nearly ready for release IN SEPTEMBER/OCTOBER!wenxue2222b16_ESO wrote: »Every new zone from B2P day onwards was always going to be paid for DLC. That's been pretty clear I think.
Actually, the game is NO DIFFERENT from what is was nine months ago in this context.It was pretty clear from the start of b2p that you will have to pay for DLCs. Its an essential part of the model.
You're wasting time trying to argue. There are too many people who feel bad that they paid for a bad product for so long. Now that it's better they feel they deserve something.
Except IC was ANNOUNCED last summer and was clearly stated by ZOS to be nearly ready for release IN SEPTEMBER/OCTOBER!wenxue2222b16_ESO wrote: »Every new zone from B2P day onwards was always going to be paid for DLC. That's been pretty clear I think.
Ergo, everyone paying at the time has paid for this already.
Celestrael wrote: »Except IC was ANNOUNCED last summer and was clearly stated by ZOS to be nearly ready for release IN SEPTEMBER/OCTOBER!wenxue2222b16_ESO wrote: »Every new zone from B2P day onwards was always going to be paid for DLC. That's been pretty clear I think.
Ergo, everyone paying at the time has paid for this already.
Frankly, PC players didn't get any content because the developers were too busy getting the console versions ready. That should be obvious. And you shouldn't be that mad because console is what saved this game from getting the lights turned out like many other PC MMO's. At the end of the day, it is what it is and making noise and badmouthing isn't going to change it. Buy the DLC, or don't. Subscribe, or don't.
NadiusMaximus wrote: »NadiusMaximus wrote: »after one year sub
after one year beta test for console
after one year without real content
after one year lag in cyrodiil
after one year paying for consol development
after one year following the carrot on the stick
after one year bad communication and promises
after one year ......
there have to be really much content in IC after this long waiting and for that price!
PC paid one year sub and console not, for what we paid?
Everyone have to pay for even the console player will have to pay for it if the want it so what is problem.
If you still pay a sub you will get DLC for "free" mean it is cover in sub fee you are pay now.
Come on now the price is that bad serious it is 2500 crown and you can buy 3000 crown for 169 SEK or 17.12 EUR, 18.81 USD, 11.99 GBP this just a fast exchange from SEK to other currency beside "special" mount in this game cost alot more them DLC pack do.
How much have you invested in the game so far?
Once you hit $300.00 without getting anything to show for it, except the now base game, call me.
If you spend $300 watching movies in a cinema, what do you have to show for it afterwards?
Do you believe you are entitled to watch movies for free now that you 'invested' so much into it?
If the theater sells a season pass for $300.00 and promises a new movie every four weeks, cool, I'll pay for that.
Now, after a year, they still show the same movie. They say ones comes Soon™ though, and it's gonna be awesome.
Then they say, we are not selling any more season passes, and everyone gets in for one payment regular ticket price. OK, well, now that sucks. I already bought my ticket and a season pass. All that money was wasted. Anyway, I love this theater and the new movie is coming soon™.
The new movie gets here, after a year of watching the same thing everyday, and they want me to pay for it again?
Wtf? I don't get how that is even ethical. It has nothing to do with entitlement, it's business ethics and ZOS lack of.
I have no problem paying for dlc, but this shouldn't have been. It's already been paid for. Or do you think Craglorn is worth $280.00 by itself? I don't.
i dont get it i really dont get it may i am stupid but why is someone defending zos
zos simply messed around with us
and people like
and