Not priority. But a new Megaserver for those who pay sub only. Joint EU and US.
Less players but much headache gone.

I'd even pay more in sub for that.

Cogo wrote: »

Not priority. But a new Megaserver for those who pay sub only. Joint EU and US.
Less players but much headache gone.

I'd even pay more in sub for that.

Uh no... I want to play with my buddies that don't want to play, too so an new Megaserver would be only another seperation of the playerbase. In addition you will never get EU and US on a single Megaserver, no matter what your purpose may be - lag is already hitting me hard enough, no need for me to play on a US server as a EU player or the other way round.

Sylveria_Relden wrote: »

Varicite wrote: »

My issue is the assumption that those who do not subscribe somehow pay less than you do, when this is pretty much pure speculation.

PS) I'm a subscriber and have been since Early Access, and paid for 2 accounts up until TU launched. I should get into Cyro twice as fast as the rest of you peasants. ; )

Who are the "peasants" you speak of? And who's speculating now?

Do you know me? Do you know how long I've had my account? Did you know I was also playing pre-release, that I pre-ordered the game (Imperial)? Do you know how long I've even had my subscription?

By "self-entitled scrub" I'm referring to those who lounge around in game, who don't invest, who don't pay cash to play but yet think they have some sort of vested interest and that they're entitled to guide and direct changes based on such experience.

As I said- if the shoe fits... and if it doesn't, perhaps you need to re-evaluate your assumption.

Again- as I said, you can make a suggestion (additive or counter) but I haven't seen one yet.

Strange, disagreeing w/ you is trolling? Okay.

You're the one who posed a question about "those who pay" and "those who don't", and I said that I don't feel that it's so cut and dry, because this thread is very clearly aimed at subscribers only.

You seem to think that I'm talking to you personally because I quoted your post, which was simply the most recent at the time in a string of parroted sentiment that those who are not subscribing are somehow not contributing to the development of the game.

I don't really care if my opinion is the unpopular one; I still felt that it needed to be pointed out that simply because a player chooses not to subscribe, they can still contribute to the game through cash shop purchases which can potentially add up to more than a monthly subscription w/ ease.

See, I thought it was pretty obvious that I was being silly w/ my "peasant" comment and don't actually feel that way (most especially since every single one of my posts has been the exact opposite of that tact and added a silly face, but hey, internet.), but you (and many others in this thread) most definitely come across as having a serious "us and them" mentality about the whole subscription scenario.

I don't share that feeling. I feel that if you paid for the game, you're in the same boat as everyone else, subscribing or not. There are other ways to contribute to the game is all I'm really saying, and those who don't do so in your preferred manner shouldn't have a lesser experience simply because their choice wasn't your choice.

Another poster mentioned a "priority queue" token that could be sold in the Crown Store for those who aren't subscribers, and I feel that is a perfectly elegant solution that keeps all parties happy, no matter HOW they choose to contribute.

GossiTheDog wrote: »

+1 on this. Happy to pay for ESO Plus if it includes queue priority. Happens in Battlefield Premium membership.

Yup I mentioned that too, and as said it should have queue priority as default, just as in Premium BF3/4.

Skafsgaard wrote: »

No *** way im paying money to get into cyrodiil. The game is sooo laggy and bugged out and adding a priority queue to payers would probably be the end of ESO on my part. I have a feeling a lot feels the same way.

As it is now ESO doesnt deserve a dime from PvP'ers

Just the fact that you log onto their servers makes them deserve money from you....this mentality baffles me..so entitled

It's coming! Post from ZoS :

The queue should prioritize the people that have had the campaign set as "home" longer. Say no to bandwagons!

Sylveria_Relden wrote: »

/signed
If you're a "self-entitled scrub" who just doesn't want to pay to play this game, you can wait in line with the rest.

Who are the self-entitled scrubs, those who subscribed (1500 crowns, DLC access, etc)and keep whining for MORE, or those who bought the game and ask for nothing?

ESO is BUY TO PLAY game now, need a picture?

Bumping this to the top again as many people cancelling their sub mentioned they would think about resubbing for a prioirity queue for ESO+ members in several threads in "General Discussion".

Its a start but subbing needs more benifits cant wait till next eso live to get an answer.

LOL, no! Everyone else paid for the game as well, how would this be fair for them? If it was an option from the get go, and people bought into the game knowing a sub only priority queue existed, that'd be a different story. But I guess if Zeni would be willing to offer refunds to anyone who dislikes your proposed stupid pay2queue system then idc!

Anyway, I dont think anything needs a change, but I'll suggest something to appease the people that do - a sub only campaign! Sure, you'll cry about not being able to play with non sub friends, but can't be selfish now can we?!