dwemer_paleologist wrote: »if you wear the right armor you can bolt escape indefinately, i have seen it every single day constantly.
scy22b14_ESO wrote: »
Oh, so this is nerf please, because I got killed in pvp.
Oh, so this is nerf please, because I got killed in pvp.
Psychobunni wrote: »
yup lets nerf us for the 665 time one more time and we will all have to delete are sorcsscy22b14_ESO wrote: »The monumental movement of vocal sorcerers screaming in defense of their blatantly overpowered class is only trumped by ZOS's vast gullibility in believing them.
More accurately, two of their abilities.
1. Shield spam. Unlimited magicka = unlimited shields = unlimited health.
2. Bolt escape. Yeah...bolt escape.
I have no issue with their burst potential, as I feel they should be capable of such.
ZOS. Play your game. Purge your inept staff. Balance this fiasco.
scy22b14_ESO wrote: »The monumental movement of vocal sorcerers screaming in defense of their blatantly overpowered class is only trumped by ZOS's vast gullibility in believing them.
More accurately, two of their abilities.
1. Shield spam. Unlimited magicka = unlimited shields = unlimited health.
2. Bolt escape. Yeah...bolt escape.
I have no issue with their burst potential, as I feel they should be capable of such.
ZOS. Play your game. Purge your inept staff. Balance this fiasco.
dwemer_paleologist wrote: »if you wear the right armor you can bolt escape indefinately, i have seen it every single day constantly.
Also none of what I originally mentioned was in the least bit anecdotal it was in fact just the plain simple truth of the matter.
scy22b14_ESO wrote: »
I am guessing that you need to experience the game. I have played well over a year now and have killed and been killed by sorcs.
Also none of what I originally mentioned was in the least bit anecdotal it was in fact just the plain simple truth of the matter.
Also none of what I originally mentioned was in the least bit anecdotal it was in fact just the plain simple truth of the matter.
What you said was 100% anecdotal. I agree with you on the issue, but to claim that your post was not 'in the least bit anecdotal' when the post was literally just an anecdote is a little absurd.