The issues related to logging in to the European PC/Mac megaserver have been resolved at this time. If you continue to experience difficulties at login, please restart your client. Thank you for your patience!

Have ZOS harmed their credibility

lathbury
lathbury
✭✭✭✭✭
I see a lot of posts and hear a lot of chat in guild on the subject of ZOS integrity/credibility. So in the interests of gaining the widest sample I have created this post. I would like to say this is not to bash ZOS but to give them as accurate a guage of the players feelings (good or bad) and some constructive criticism or positive feedback. On that note please expand on your poll selection and explain as specifically as possible why you hold that view.
Edited by lathbury on March 23, 2015 10:53PM

Have ZOS harmed their credibility 53 votes

I feel ZOS has lost all credibility and there is no regaining it because..
13%
kewlDeathTrapLionxoftKevinmonNikolasDazin93Iyas 7 votes
I feel ZOS has lost no credibility and should get credit because..
1%
runagate 1 vote
I feel ZOS has lost all credibility because... but could build bridges by...
20%
Ysne58TheLawBigMNaor_SarethivrineAnath_QoRioNoTimeNukeAllTheThingsMantic0r3MrDenimChickenfelinith66 11 votes
I feel ZOS has lost some credibility because... but cant be judged to harshly because
15%
SythiasBeowulf_McCallumstarkerealmb_archaonpreeb18_ESOIluvrienLameoveRtheweakmindedEgonieser 8 votes
I feel ZOS have more credibility/intergrity than they are given credit for because...
13%
daryl.rasmusenb14_ESOGranzSarevoccFfastylAlannaofmarsPetrichorMentis 7 votes
The poll options do not reflect my view on the subject which is...
35%
KalfisObscuredeathmasterl_ESOnerevarine1138StaticWaxDrOrpheusDanikatInactive AccountGreySixatrioxcub18_ESOKeroncyqaLord_KreeganlordbazukaYourNameHereGelstonphairdonEnemy-of-ColdharbourGrapdjan 19 votes
  • Ysne58
    Ysne58
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    I feel ZOS has lost all credibility because... but could build bridges by...
    They could start by explaining/apologizing for they way they handled the BtP change.

    The latest in a long line of decisions that makes them look even more dodgy is how they handle the crown store. Crowns are account wide across both NA and EU servers but the purchases are not. This means that if you by something on the EU Server that amount of crowns is also subtracted from the account on the NA server but you don't have the item on the NA server. People who play both will have to pay twice for the Imperial upgrade and the renamed Explorer pack.
  • Gelston
    Gelston
    ✭✭✭
    The poll options do not reflect my view on the subject which is...
    They aren't really any different from any other business, gaming or otherwise, and the credibility they have now with me is the same they've always had. Companies exist to make money and if you understand that, many of their decisions make perfect sense.

    I remain here because I genuinely enjoy the game and many of the other players in the game.
  • Lord_Kreegan
    Lord_Kreegan
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    The poll options do not reflect my view on the subject which is...
    To lose credibility, you must have credibility.

    FWIW, expect this thread to be closed quickly. ZOS' marketing department really hates to see anyone challenging their integrity, even though there is ample reason to do so.
  • StaticWax
    StaticWax
    ✭✭✭✭
    The poll options do not reflect my view on the subject which is...
    The OP lost credibility by making this poll, imo.
    I wish nothing but joy for everyone.
  • YourNameHere
    YourNameHere
    ✭✭✭
    The poll options do not reflect my view on the subject which is...
    They didn't lose anything from me. *shrugs*
    NA Megaserver / RPer
    Alinyssa Gaethar - AD || Raahni-do - AD || Wind-In-Tree's-Shadow - DC
  • Vahrokh
    Vahrokh
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    ✭✭✭
    Gelston wrote: »
    They aren't really any different from any other business, gaming or otherwise, and the credibility they have now with me is the same they've always had. Companies exist to make money and if you understand that, many of their decisions make perfect sense.

    I remain here because I genuinely enjoy the game and many of the other players in the game.

    Companies exist to make money, true. In order to do so, they subscribe to a minimum amount of standards so that they are not forced going F2P after 10 months past release, on a $100M investment they might never earn back.
  • Robbmrp
    Robbmrp
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    I'm not voting on this because all of their decisions are based on making money, the same as every other MMO out there.

    If they want to change how people view their company they can start by delivering us the game that they are selling. A game where we can all come to enjoy without having to turn down our graphic settings. A PVE game without Lag. A PVP game without lag. The massive PVP battles you see in EVERY video advertisement, not small PVP skirmishes but HUGE battles.

    They can start by delivering us the game that we bought based on that premise. The trailers that they've got posted all over the main site. IF and WHEN they deliver that to us, anything that's happened over the last year won't matter at all. We'll be too absorbed in the world that IS ESO....
    NA Server - Kildair
  • Mentis
    Mentis
    ✭✭✭
    I feel ZOS have more credibility/intergrity than they are given credit for because...
    "constructive criticism" ok^^

    We need better and more servers, to solve the lags and not just the "look-whats-happen-way" atm ;)
  • theweakminded
    theweakminded
    ✭✭✭
    I feel ZOS has lost some credibility because... but cant be judged to harshly because
    This is a business. You want your game to keep going? Sometimes changes have to happen, life isn't free. More people=More money=Better chance at more content.
  • nerevarine1138
    nerevarine1138
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    The poll options do not reflect my view on the subject which is...
    ...I play games based on how much I enjoy them, not based on whether or not I find their developers to be cute and cuddly.
    ----
    Murray?
  • Gelston
    Gelston
    ✭✭✭
    The poll options do not reflect my view on the subject which is...
    Vahrokh wrote: »
    Gelston wrote: »
    They aren't really any different from any other business, gaming or otherwise, and the credibility they have now with me is the same they've always had. Companies exist to make money and if you understand that, many of their decisions make perfect sense.

    I remain here because I genuinely enjoy the game and many of the other players in the game.

    Companies exist to make money, true. In order to do so, they subscribe to a minimum amount of standards so that they are not forced going F2P after 10 months past release, on a $100M investment they might never earn back.

    Good thing ESO hasn't gone F2P.
  • Raash
    Raash
    ✭✭✭✭
    I dont think they had credability from the start really (they are not politicians - they are trying to sell their product and a consumer always have the short end of the stick), everyone but the most obnoxious souls could see where the game was going and that it would land in f2p, and yeah i know you gonna bark now since you say its b2p. It is for new players yes, but for me and most of you its now f2p.
    They had a original plan for the game but it sunk and it sunk fast. So who can blame them for trying other routes?
  • nerevarine1138
    nerevarine1138
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    The poll options do not reflect my view on the subject which is...
    To lose credibility, you must have credibility.

    FWIW, expect this thread to be closed quickly. ZOS' marketing department really hates to see anyone challenging their integrity, even though there is ample reason to do so.

    Of course, they may just want to keep these forums on-topic with regards to the game instead of irrelevant whining about marketing.
    ----
    Murray?
  • BigM
    BigM
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    I feel ZOS has lost all credibility because... but could build bridges by...
    I feel they just made some bad decisions, can make it right but it could take a while. If they would start fixing the bugs and figure out the problems with lag on the megaserver things could start getting better. Sad part is they need to get consoles up and running and hopefully with less bugs. Once both are up I hope they make it a priority to fix as many major bugs they can. But give them a break on a few small bugs because all online games have them, yes even WoW after all this time.

    I'm still upset about what we had to go through from beta to the announcement of going B2P. But damn they made a beautiful world that has so darn much potential. I sunk enough money in the game and I hate to see it all go to waste. Fix the big issues and I will be a loyal player till I go to sleep forever. just fix the darn game because being 60 not sure how long I got left. :smiley:
    “The greatest enemy of knowledge is not ignorance, it is the illusion of knowledge.”
    ― Stephen Hawking
  • Petrichor
    Petrichor
    Soul Shriven
    I feel ZOS have more credibility/intergrity than they are given credit for because...
    ZOS is perfectly credible - I don't understand why people have been so pissy over the changes that have come from (and after) update 6. The game has progressively gotten better, and is the best it's ever been right now. I've been in this since early beta, so I've got some perspective... Customer service has also always been prompt for me in-game (granted I haven't had any horrific problems thankfully).

    What do you guys expect, exactly?
  • Granz
    Granz
    ✭✭
    I feel ZOS have more credibility/intergrity than they are given credit for because...
    They have lost nothing. I have not played this game since release. I am enjoying it and they have fixed a ton of my complaints.
  • GreySix
    GreySix
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    The poll options do not reflect my view on the subject which is...
    With the exception of forcing solo play in the main quest, Zenimax did what I thought they would do. It's an MMO, so I expected a generic MMO flavored with TES. That's what we got.
    Crotchety Old Man Guild

    "Hey you, get off my lawn!"
  • Danikat
    Danikat
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    The poll options do not reflect my view on the subject which is...
    Gelston wrote: »
    They aren't really any different from any other business, gaming or otherwise, and the credibility they have now with me is the same they've always had. Companies exist to make money and if you understand that, many of their decisions make perfect sense.

    I remain here because I genuinely enjoy the game and many of the other players in the game.

    I agree with this.

    This is why I much prefer to consider all purchases, including games and in-game items as a straight-forward transaction. None of this "supporting the company", "showing my appreciation/thanks for something not directly related to that item", "investing in future content" etc.

    That way I don't have to worry about whether I will eventually get what I imagine I was promised, or whether a year, two years, 5 years etc. down the line this will be a game and a company I want to 'show my support to'. I paid for an online, multiplayer Elder Scrolls game (and at the time I got it that was a one-time payment, not a subscription) and I got it.
    PC EU player | She/her/hers | PAWS (Positively Against Wrip-off Stuff) - Say No to Crown Crates!

    "Remember in this game we call life that no one said it's fair"
  • LameoveR
    LameoveR
    ✭✭✭✭
    I feel ZOS has lost some credibility because... but cant be judged to harshly because
    i dont speek english and random vote thanks
  • Ffastyl
    Ffastyl
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    I feel ZOS have more credibility/intergrity than they are given credit for because...
    ZOS is a newer company trying the less traveled roads. They are attempting to be more transparent than most companies with their first game, and are learning mostly the hard way why most companies are not transparent.

    An example of this is the Champion System announcement at Quakecon in July 2014. ZOS barely had a UI for it back then, and they announced the complete conversion of XP earned past level 50 to Champion Points upon conversion -- that was in the early stages of development. After internal debate and testing, the power gap was discovered and the conversion rate changed. I am sure most of you remember the community backlash. Since then (I have noticed) ZOS is trying to be transparent, but confirming the TBA information is not subject to major change before sharing it (i.e. the Patch Notes).

    They also have the only customer support I am aware of that will call you back after talking to them about a problem.
    "A person is smart. People are dumb, panicky, dangerous animals and you know it."

    PC NA
    Daggerfall Covenant

    Ffastyl - Level 50 Templar
    Arturus Amitis - Level 50 Nightblade
    Sulac the Wanderer - Level 50 Dragonknight
    Arcturus Leland - Level 50 Sorcerer
    Azrog rus-Oliphet - Level 50 Templar
    Tienc - Level 50 Warden
    Aldmeri Dominion
    Ashen Willow Knight - Level 50 Templar
    Champion Rank 938

    Check out:
    Old vs New Intro Cinematics


    "My strength is that I have no weaknesses. My weakness is that I have no strengths."
    Member since May 4th, 2014.
  • cyqa
    cyqa
    ✭✭✭
    The poll options do not reflect my view on the subject which is...
    As long as I'm enjoying the game, I'm happy. If ZOS goes in a direction I don't agree with and I stop having fun, I'll just stop playing and try something else. They didn't lose credibility with me when they went B2P. I don't agree with every decision they've made, or the way they've gone about announcing their decisions, but I don't feel hard done by.

    I feel like after going through the SWG decline, no MMO can possibly disappoint me again. :P
  • Naor_Sarethi
    Naor_Sarethi
    ✭✭✭
    I feel ZOS has lost all credibility because... but could build bridges by...
    This is by all means a point of no return. The game is young enough and Zenimax liberal enough to fire staff and hire new people.
    Something i'd very much recommend. And by hiring i mean get competent people on the job.
    people who

    a) understand what this game is about, aka TES veterans and not veterans from failed MMO's
    b) people who know how to present the game realistically and properly (the podcasts are a joke and the advertisement doesn't reflect the game)
    c) capable technical staff that actually fixes things without creating 5 new problems in its wake.

    If at least i hear that they make an effort to redeem themselves and make huge alterations in a reasonable amount of time it can all be forgiven.
    If it goes down the same way though, then yea they would lose all credibility and i'd urge Bethesda to find someone else to work with.
  • linoge63
    linoge63
    ✭✭✭
    Their credibility has increased if anything.
  • atrioxcub18_ESO
    atrioxcub18_ESO
    Soul Shriven
    The poll options do not reflect my view on the subject which is...
    Credibility doesn't factor into anything here for me. Its a video game, is it fun? If so, play ; If not, don't play.

    I like the game. As a big TES fan since Morrowind I play this because its TES. I played during the final beta and at launch. I paid for 1 month sub, then I stopped playing/paying. I am only back now because it no longer requires a sub to play.

    I don't play any other MMOs anymore and haven't for a while. When this game no longer appeals to me - for whatever reason - or something more interesting comes along, I will stop playing it.
  • lathbury
    lathbury
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    linoge63 wrote: »
    Their credibility has increased if anything.

    how so?
  • Naor_Sarethi
    Naor_Sarethi
    ✭✭✭
    I feel ZOS has lost all credibility because... but could build bridges by...
    linoge63 wrote: »
    Their credibility has increased if anything.

    So far they've lived off the fruits of Bethesdas work imo, i didn't even know them if it hadn't been for the TES titles.
    This game however made it clear which of the 2 i'll put my trust in, in the future.
  • Keron
    Keron
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    The poll options do not reflect my view on the subject which is...
    What is this credibility you are talking about?
  • lathbury
    lathbury
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    Keron wrote: »
    What is this credibility you are talking about?

    would you trust them to keep their word basically
  • atrioxcub18_ESO
    atrioxcub18_ESO
    Soul Shriven
    The poll options do not reflect my view on the subject which is...
    i'd urge Bethesda to find someone else to work with.
    So far they've lived off the fruits of Bethesdas work imo, i didn't even know them if it hadn't been for the TES titles.
    This game however made it clear which of the 2 i'll put my trust in, in the future.

    That doesn't even make any sense because ZOS and Bethesda are both subsidiaries of Zenimax Media...
    Edited by atrioxcub18_ESO on March 24, 2015 12:16AM
  • LameoveR
    LameoveR
    ✭✭✭✭
    I feel ZOS has lost some credibility because... but cant be judged to harshly because
    Zenimax is a parent company for Bethesda Softworks and Zenimax Online Studios, m`kay?
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ZeniMax_Online_Studios
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bethesda_Softworks
Sign In or Register to comment.