xMovingTarget wrote: »Its not a bug. ZoS did that intentionally.. So if we want more magicka back on full charged HA we need to spend points in the CS.. If we like it or not.. -.-
I have discovered a few secret nerfs or maybe bugs with the destruction staff.
I don't know, if this was announced in the patchnotes, because I haven't seen it there.
First of, heavy attacks take like 50% (maybe a bit less) more time to charge. People say, this is intended ?
And both, Destruction and restoration staff heavy attacks only restore 6% Magicka now, which is very low in my opinion.
Is that intended ?
xMovingTarget wrote: »Its not a bug. ZoS did that intentionally.. So if we want more magicka back on full charged HA we need to spend points in the CS.. If we like it or not.. -.-
No I have 3600 CP activated and the restored Magicka is only 6%.
So this must be a bug I think and how about the longer cast time for destruction staff heavy attacks ? Do you know, if it is intended ?
xMovingTarget wrote: »xMovingTarget wrote: »Its not a bug. ZoS did that intentionally.. So if we want more magicka back on full charged HA we need to spend points in the CS.. If we like it or not.. -.-
No I have 3600 CP activated and the restored Magicka is only 6%.
So this must be a bug I think and how about the longer cast time for destruction staff heavy attacks ? Do you know, if it is intended ?
The longer cast time is intended. Since they boosted the damage by alot. But after your post saying "with 3600CP" i cant believe the magicka return works properly.
I also noticed, that on 3600cp, my DK has 43k magicka, you dont seem to notice any magicka return on heavy attack. It seems pretty low though.
Idk, if its not a bug, they might have tried to rebalance it because of Spell Symm and potions. Since you now gain 20% more regen for a good amount of time. But still not right. Magicka return is very low.
So, we need some clarification from @ZOS about longer heavy attack cast time on staffs, and about abnormally low resources restoration from heavy attacks of staffs (staffs only?)