Nyghthowler wrote: »As I posted in another thread, when you click the 'I Accept' you have signed a digital agreement which in other words is a CONTRACT.
In their ToS it states they have the right to make any changes, modifications, blah blah blah they feel necessary.
6. Availability of Services and Content; Game Maintenance, Patches, Updates; Termination of Services
ZeniMax does not guarantee that any Services will be available at all times, in all countries and/or geographic locations, at any given time, or that it will continue to offer any particular Services for any particular length of time. Except as prohibited by applicable law, ZeniMax reserves the right to change and update Content without notice to You. ZeniMax also reserves the right to refuse Your request(s) to acquire Content, and to limit or block any request to acquire Content, including, but not limited to, Downloadable Content, for any reason.
Nyghthowler wrote: »As I posted in another thread, when you click the 'I Accept' you have signed a digital agreement which in other words is a CONTRACT.
In their ToS it states they have the right to make any changes, modifications, blah blah blah they feel necessary.
6. Availability of Services and Content; Game Maintenance, Patches, Updates; Termination of Services
ZeniMax does not guarantee that any Services will be available at all times, in all countries and/or geographic locations, at any given time, or that it will continue to offer any particular Services for any particular length of time. Except as prohibited by applicable law, ZeniMax reserves the right to change and update Content without notice to You. ZeniMax also reserves the right to refuse Your request(s) to acquire Content, and to limit or block any request to acquire Content, including, but not limited to, Downloadable Content, for any reason.
The Terms of Service have a note near the top (and in another section...I think maybe 12?) that certain limitations do not apply to Australians or any other country where local law supercedes, but I'm too lazy to dig it out right now.
nerevarine1138 wrote: »This is why people with no legal education shouldn't be discussing the law on the internet.
nerevarine1138 wrote: »Nyghthowler wrote: »As I posted in another thread, when you click the 'I Accept' you have signed a digital agreement which in other words is a CONTRACT.
In their ToS it states they have the right to make any changes, modifications, blah blah blah they feel necessary.
6. Availability of Services and Content; Game Maintenance, Patches, Updates; Termination of Services
ZeniMax does not guarantee that any Services will be available at all times, in all countries and/or geographic locations, at any given time, or that it will continue to offer any particular Services for any particular length of time. Except as prohibited by applicable law, ZeniMax reserves the right to change and update Content without notice to You. ZeniMax also reserves the right to refuse Your request(s) to acquire Content, and to limit or block any request to acquire Content, including, but not limited to, Downloadable Content, for any reason.
The Terms of Service have a note near the top (and in another section...I think maybe 12?) that certain limitations do not apply to Australians or any other country where local law supercedes, but I'm too lazy to dig it out right now.
The ToS are also not entirely relevant to the OP's misguided attempt to claim that ZO is violating Australian law with their news post.
However, here is the part of the ToS you were referring to: "If any change is unacceptable to You, You may cancel Your subscription at any time, but ZeniMax will not refund any fees or prorate fees for any subscription. Depending on the country where You reside, including if You live in the EEA, Norway, Switzerland or Australia, the law may require different provisions to apply which will be specified when You subscribe and/or in the specific notice provided to You."
That doesn't actually mean that Australians can whine about any perceived wrong and receive refunds for their subscription fees. It just means that there are different standards in specific countries that are specified in notices for subscribers from those countries. Any Aussie players who have actually bothered to read/save those specifics would be able to share them.
As the whole point of this thread states- for the very last time Zos should not advertise to Australians that have extra time on their subs after b2p goes live that they cannot acess refunds.
I bought it online.
If you bought from an Australian business online,
you have the same refund rights as when buying from
a shop – unless you bought the item from a private seller.
nerevarine1138 wrote: »Yep prohibited by australian law. But so is telling Australians they cannot get a refund. As I said at the start - the issue here is Zos advertising that customers in Australia cannot have accesses to a refund.
Please read before posting. T&C don't give them the right to mislead consumers on their rights.
ZO is telling all customers that they don't have the right to a refund on a paid subscription service on their international (but US-based) site. The Australian law you mentioned does not apply to anything in that scenario.
This is why people with no legal education shouldn't be discussing the law on the internet.
ZOS_GinaBruno wrote: »Short answer is DKs likely won't be seeing a ton of changes before we go live; this class is still quite powerful (as it should be being a tank), even after some of the adjustments we've made to other classes and abilities.
I'm reasonably sure most European countries have laws protecting the customer from such actions. I know mine does, if the product significantly differs from what was offered and I was misled into buying, I'm entitled to a refund no matter what the company policy says.
I'm reasonably sure most European countries have laws protecting the customer from such actions. I know mine does, if the product significantly differs from what was offered and I was misled into buying, I'm entitled to a refund no matter what the company policy says.
Correct. I am running a UK action group against Frontier Developments because they shafted people on Elite Dangerous and they are now backing down. We had a lawyer working with us all the way and there are multiple risks for a seller in this scenario. Also since June 13th 2014 there are specific protections for digital content specifically including those that go behind paywalls.
In the EU ZOS will find their course tricky (maybe not impossible, I have not looked at ESO in detail) but generally speaking TOC are meaningless in the EU as the law is so strict anyway.
I'm reasonably sure most European countries have laws protecting the customer from such actions. I know mine does, if the product significantly differs from what was offered and I was misled into buying, I'm entitled to a refund no matter what the company policy says.
Correct. I am running a UK action group against Frontier Developments because they shafted people on Elite Dangerous and they are now backing down. We had a lawyer working with us all the way and there are multiple risks for a seller in this scenario. Also since June 13th 2014 there are specific protections for digital content specifically including those that go behind paywalls.
In the EU ZOS will find their course tricky (maybe not impossible, I have not looked at ESO in detail) but generally speaking TOC are meaningless in the EU as the law is so strict anyway.
What is the problem with Elite Dangerous?
Spottswoode wrote: »
olemanwinter wrote: »This is why you ALWAYS sub 1 month at a time. ALWAYS.
Yeah, mine lapsed for a day, so I won't get whatever stupid mount reward they give you that will almost certainly be worse than what can be bought for $8 in the cash shop.
And yeah, I paid $1 more per month to play the game.
But you people with your 6 month subs and stuff. *shakes head*.
Some people just have to learn the hard way.
Spottswoode wrote: »
In fact, there are US laws that forbid US companies from breaking certain other countries' laws while operating in that country (i.e bribing officials, and staging a coup). Though, it usually only comes with a fine on the US side.
Spottswoode wrote: »
In fact, there are US laws that forbid US companies from breaking certain other countries' laws while operating in that country (i.e bribing officials, and staging a coup). Though, it usually only comes with a fine on the US side.
What the op does not seem to understand is that ZoS is not operating inside Australia. ESO is sold online from a foreign website. Maybe the people who bought the product at a store location could try to make a case, but the ToS is clear and anyone who attempts to fight it would waste more money on lawyers than they would get in return. But hey op, if you want to sue, go ahead and try. No one is stopping you.
Spottswoode wrote: »
In fact, there are US laws that forbid US companies from breaking certain other countries' laws while operating in that country (i.e bribing officials, and staging a coup). Though, it usually only comes with a fine on the US side.
What the op does not seem to understand is that ZoS is not operating inside Australia. ESO is sold online from a foreign website. Maybe the people who bought the product at a store location could try to make a case, but the ToS is clear and anyone who attempts to fight it would waste more money on lawyers than they would get in return. But hey op, if you want to sue, go ahead and try. No one is stopping you.
Don't sue. Just file a dispute with your cc and let their lawyers handle it (just be sure to be honest and accurate, and include evidence).
Spottswoode wrote: »
In fact, there are US laws that forbid US companies from breaking certain other countries' laws while operating in that country (i.e bribing officials, and staging a coup). Though, it usually only comes with a fine on the US side.
What the op does not seem to understand is that ZoS is not operating inside Australia. ESO is sold online from a foreign website. Maybe the people who bought the product at a store location could try to make a case, but the ToS is clear and anyone who attempts to fight it would waste more money on lawyers than they would get in return. But hey op, if you want to sue, go ahead and try. No one is stopping you.
Don't sue. Just file a dispute with your cc and let their lawyers handle it (just be sure to be honest and accurate, and include evidence).
And then let us all know what happens.
Spottswoode wrote: »
In fact, there are US laws that forbid US companies from breaking certain other countries' laws while operating in that country (i.e bribing officials, and staging a coup). Though, it usually only comes with a fine on the US side.
What the op does not seem to understand is that ZoS is not operating inside Australia. ESO is sold online from a foreign website. Maybe the people who bought the product at a store location could try to make a case, but the ToS is clear and anyone who attempts to fight it would waste more money on lawyers than they would get in return. But hey op, if you want to sue, go ahead and try. No one is stopping you.
Don't sue. Just file a dispute with your cc and let their lawyers handle it (just be sure to be honest and accurate, and include evidence).
And then let us all know what happens.
Well, if I win my dispute, can't let you know of until March. If I lose then I guess I am stuck here and will let you know. Either way, no harm no foul (on my side at least).
Spottswoode wrote: »
In fact, there are US laws that forbid US companies from breaking certain other countries' laws while operating in that country (i.e bribing officials, and staging a coup). Though, it usually only comes with a fine on the US side.
What the op does not seem to understand is that ZoS is not operating inside Australia. ESO is sold online from a foreign website. Maybe the people who bought the product at a store location could try to make a case, but the ToS is clear and anyone who attempts to fight it would waste more money on lawyers than they would get in return. But hey op, if you want to sue, go ahead and try. No one is stopping you.
Don't sue. Just file a dispute with your cc and let their lawyers handle it (just be sure to be honest and accurate, and include evidence).
And then let us all know what happens.
Well, if I win my dispute, can't let you know of until March. If I lose then I guess I am stuck here and will let you know. Either way, no harm no foul (on my side at least).
I wonder how many claims they get everyday.
That's true, and partially caused by our own unwillingness to fight for better services. Malfunction is considered normal in this industry. If I bought a vacuum cleaner that didn't work when I got home, I'd return it immediately. If it happens with a video game, I just wait until the servers get fixed... in a week or so... maybe.I'm reasonably sure most European countries have laws protecting the customer from such actions. I know mine does, if the product significantly differs from what was offered and I was misled into buying, I'm entitled to a refund no matter what the company policy says.
Mine too. They do seem to have problems applying these laws to games and online services though.
Anyway, while demanding refund for time already played since launch is totally unreasonable, a refund for days left on your account after ESO goes B2P is definitely justified.
Spottswoode wrote: »
In fact, there are US laws that forbid US companies from breaking certain other countries' laws while operating in that country (i.e bribing officials, and staging a coup). Though, it usually only comes with a fine on the US side.
What the op does not seem to understand is that ZoS is not operating inside Australia. ESO is sold online from a foreign website. Maybe the people who bought the product at a store location could try to make a case, but the ToS is clear and anyone who attempts to fight it would waste more money on lawyers than they would get in return. But hey op, if you want to sue, go ahead and try. No one is stopping you.
Don't sue. Just file a dispute with your cc and let their lawyers handle it (just be sure to be honest and accurate, and include evidence).