Korah_Eaglecry wrote: »The demographic of the game changes from one that plays the game for what it is to a demographic that plays for a short period of time before moving on.
jaygraeb14a_ESO wrote: »The day this game goes F2P is the day they lose one F2P player.
Don't even get me started on the destruction F2P brings...
1. non-english speaking players...
2. people with 50x accounts farming/botting....
3. non stop trolls re-rolling new toons/locked accounts...
4. people running around with laser-beam jedi outfits on because the devs want more "cash shop" money and ran out of ideas...
I could go on for hours...just stop with this "F2P" garbage. the subs are up, deal with having to pay 15.00 dollars/month or go play LoTRo.
JoffyToffy69 wrote: »There is a negative stigma around f2p. It's almost taboo to discuss it.
I think maybe people think that f2p is all about cash shops for vanity crap and pay to win items.
I think that if ESO goes f2p on console, it will be more like DLC options.
I loved the DLC for Skyrim. It was optional and didn't negatively affect your gameplay if you chose not to get it.
Having a sub makes it not optional to play the base game without the extras.
Having certain sections as DLC such as joining the Dark Brotherhood, I think is acceptable if done right.
Is DLC more acceptable than the f2p mindset?