Elite caused lag on Haderus?

  • prootch
    prootch
    ✭✭✭
    ok man, we will check who is the cause and let you know.
  • Lilarna
    Lilarna
    ✭✭✭
    Can some people invade Chillrend or something instead of turning Haderus into a lagfest ?

    Isn't it time for EU guilds to just spread out evenly on campaigns ? It would be so simple no ?

    Thornblade can stay in the hands of the lag lovers...
    And if the pvp population spreads out smartly between Azura and Haderus and Chillrend, it'll be a greater experience for everyone !

    And if people imperatively want a Lagblade 2.0, stick with one campaign like Azura was for months, or another one of your choosing.

    edit : Please indicate EU in title :)
    Edited by Lilarna on January 20, 2015 9:13PM
  • Lava_Croft
    Lava_Croft
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    ✭✭✭✭
    Haderus is simply atrocious tonight. I want to thank all the large groups from all factions for invading Haderus and turning it into the same kind of place some of us tried to escape from.
  • Bouvin
    Bouvin
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    Rologue wrote: »
    I was accused last night for my guild bringing lag to the server. I believe this is false, but rather ask and find out for sure... And if we were truly the cause, how to prevent it in the future.
    What Elite is: a play how you want guild, in a relaxed PvP environment. We don't call for aoe spams, and only really suggest when our members should go all out... EG: ultimates. Otherwise, we don't tell people how to fight.
    We had 1 full raid, and 3 guilds waiting for a spot (also in the area)
    Does this seem to be us? Or the combined focus of roughly 70 EP in the ame area, with a seize that we started alone.

    I wish ZOS would just figure out how to fix the lag issues and lag exploits.

    This way players can stop blaming players. And factions can stop accusing other factions of causing the lag.

    It's not the player's faults really. It's the game's performance in PvP.
  • ThyIronFist
    ThyIronFist
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    Well EU haderus is thornblade 2.0 now... thanks to all you large zergs, why can't you lagspammers just stay on thornblade and azuras?? ffs
    The Elder Zergs Online
    Sainur Ironfist - DK - EU - Ebonheart Pact
    Retired
  • AriBoh
    AriBoh
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    Totally ruined. Nothing but zerg-lags where more ppl = more win.
    khele23eb17
    Agreed. Whoever came up with the design should be shot in the foot and only admitted to hospital when he manages to find 3 other people willing to maim themselves the same way in order to accompany him.

    ZOS_AmeliaR admin
    Ultimately, any method of entering an enemy keep without breaking down the door is considered an exploit. Thanks for checking!

    tinythinker
    "I used to be a healer once, but then I took a Wrobel to the knee"
  • Lilarna
    Lilarna
    ✭✭✭
    Happy to see we're not the only ones fleeing zergdom ! Then we have to go to Chillrend, I'm guessing the usual two bar blue population there are soldiers of the Covenant looking for skyshards and doing quests no ?

    Or else, reroll low level alts and fool around on Blackwater Blade, I'm personally prepping a fifth toon to have the option.
  • Columba
    Columba
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    Lava_Croft wrote: »
    Haderus is simply atrocious tonight. I want to thank all the large groups from all factions for invading Haderus and turning it into the same kind of place some of us tried to escape from.

    Ep lagsploiters wreck Thorne, so perhaps DC and AD are returning the favor?

  • Soris
    Soris
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    Lilarna wrote: »
    Happy to see we're not the only ones fleeing zergdom ! Then we have to go to Chillrend, I'm guessing the usual two bar blue population there are soldiers of the Covenant looking for skyshards and doing quests no ?

    Or else, reroll low level alts and fool around on Blackwater Blade, I'm personally prepping a fifth toon to have the option.

    Ratio in Chillrend as for AD side compared to the blues, 1:10. It's just waste of time imo for solo roamers like me.
    But if a small AD/EP community move there, then it will be good campaign for all sides.
    Welkynd [Templar/AD/EU]
  • ToRelax
    ToRelax
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    ✭✭
    Columba wrote: »
    Lava_Croft wrote: »
    Haderus is simply atrocious tonight. I want to thank all the large groups from all factions for invading Haderus and turning it into the same kind of place some of us tried to escape from.

    Ep lagsploiters wreck Thorne, so perhaps DC and AD are returning the favor?

    Either talk about EU or get out of the EU thread, cmon.
    Soris_ESO wrote: »
    Lilarna wrote: »
    Happy to see we're not the only ones fleeing zergdom ! Then we have to go to Chillrend, I'm guessing the usual two bar blue population there are soldiers of the Covenant looking for skyshards and doing quests no ?

    Or else, reroll low level alts and fool around on Blackwater Blade, I'm personally prepping a fifth toon to have the option.

    Ratio in Chillrend as for AD side compared to the blues, 1:10. It's just waste of time imo for solo roamers like me.
    But if a small AD/EP community move there, then it will be good campaign for all sides.

    It would be much harder than Haderus we presume but if we can have lag- and zergfree PvP again we would be in for it.
    DAGON - ALTADOON - CHIM - GHARTOK
    The Covenant is broken. The Enemy has won...

    Elo'dryel - Sorc - AR 50 - Hopesfire - EP EU
  • prootch
    prootch
    ✭✭✭
    As for the DC Alliances guilds, we are on haderus now. We left azura because of pulsaballs and lagtrain coming from tb after the reduction of campaign caps. We just hope they dont follow and stay on Asura. We never set foot on Chillrend so I dunno what to do for it. EP could spread there most certainly when you see the balance of population on EU servers.

    We found a balanced battlegroung there, with all factions locked in prime time. Low lag except on emperor's keep siege, and manageable anyway.
  • Kas
    Kas
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    No guild is to blame.

    Imho ZOS needs to lower the bonus AP for groups. It's crazy how terrible zergs can still make decent AP. We need more incentive to run as groups of 4, 8, 12 and while running with 24 should be possible and effective as well, even bigger zergs need to experience serious drawbacks.

    50vs50 gives you ~10 times more AP than 1v1. Some bonus is great, but this maginitude is just *** and drives every faction into zerging and encourages guilds to run with more than one group. The servers can't handle such zergs, instead of lowering campaign caps, just make people WANT to split up
    @bbu - AD/EU
    Kasiia - Templar (AR46)
    Kasiir Aberion - Sorc (AR38)
    Dr Kastafari - Warden (~AR31)
    + many others
  • ThyIronFist
    ThyIronFist
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    Soris_ESO wrote: »
    Lilarna wrote: »
    Happy to see we're not the only ones fleeing zergdom ! Then we have to go to Chillrend, I'm guessing the usual two bar blue population there are soldiers of the Covenant looking for skyshards and doing quests no ?

    Or else, reroll low level alts and fool around on Blackwater Blade, I'm personally prepping a fifth toon to have the option.

    Ratio in Chillrend as for AD side compared to the blues, 1:10. It's just waste of time imo for solo roamers like me.
    But if a small AD/EP community move there, then it will be good campaign for all sides.

    Well my guild and some other EP moved to Chillrend last nigh, Haderus is ruined, so hopefully this campaign will be good.
    The Elder Zergs Online
    Sainur Ironfist - DK - EU - Ebonheart Pact
    Retired
  • prootch
    prootch
    ✭✭✭
    Which guild ?
  • Lhorion
    Lhorion
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    It is funny to read, but........ Theme is Haderus [EU]!!!
    Who laughed about that guy complaining about three locked factions? Well.... It is true! Three days ago all three factions were locked at primetime.

    Why most of you are talking about AoE-zergs causing the lag? When three factions are locked and fighting for one keep (Allesia or Kingscrest one day ago).... This is the reason, not an AoE-Train.
  • prootch
    prootch
    ✭✭✭
    We just killed a red pulseball in Alessia keep 3 days ago on haderus (EU).
    Since then no real pb of lag. And again yesterday we had lock on prime time, but the fights where real great.
  • nAismA
    nAismA
    ✭✭
    @Lhorion i think you are not peticular right

    the CAUSE of the lags is the bad infrastructure (server, network, etc) and bad coding (program, etc) that isnt capable of the given amount of players in AvA.

    4 the cause zenimax and bethesda is fully responsible, and yes they are! its theyre product indeed, whatever they told in EULA/AU.


    but the TRIGGER of the lags are that too many players in a close area using too much skills with particle effects.

    some player do this knowingly (maybe by intention?^^) - i experience this myself, see it with my own eyes - the raid/blop/zerg rushes into attack, spamming aoe and the lagging starts.

    (this is now something philosophical^^)
    thats in my opinion why aoe spamming raids are indeed responsible 4 triggering the lag, but they are not responsible 4 the cause of the lag.



    to come back to the thread-topic: i give elite decimation, rologue and iseko, credit that they dont (intentional^^) trigger the lag on haderus.

    in my last two months on azura fighting against elite or ep&dc in overall lag wasnt an issue.


  • Lava_Croft
    Lava_Croft
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    ✭✭✭✭
    Columba wrote: »
    Lava_Croft wrote: »
    Haderus is simply atrocious tonight. I want to thank all the large groups from all factions for invading Haderus and turning it into the same kind of place some of us tried to escape from.

    Ep lagsploiters wreck Thorne, so perhaps DC and AD are returning the favor?
    This is about EU-Haderus. Every faction has big groups that make ESO cry. You are still a broken record.
Sign In or Register to comment.