Maintenance for the week of September 29:
• PC/Mac: NA and EU megaservers for patch maintenance – September 29, 4:00AM EDT (8:00 UTC) - 9:00AM EDT (13:00 UTC)
• Xbox: NA and EU megaservers for patch maintenance – October 1, 8:00 UTC (4:00AM EDT) - 16:00 UTC (12:00PM EDT)
• PlayStation®: NA and EU megaservers for patch maintenance – October 1, 8:00 UTC (4:00AM EDT) - 16:00 UTC (12:00PM EDT)

"IF" ESO goes F2P will you stay?

  • Wolfshead
    Wolfshead
    ✭✭✭✭
    F2P model you always end up pay more money then for P2P model and the are no argument about it would leave or stay if ESO went F2P i would mostlike leave for thing is with F2P the will be bring more people aswell troll on forum and know it all player to game which may look fine in number department but it will slowly kill the game of most people.
    If you find yourself alone, riding in green fields with the sun on your face, do not be troubled; for you are in Elysium, and you're already dead
    What we do in life, echoes in eternity
  • skillastat
    skillastat
    ✭✭✭✭
    I hope Zenimax Online see this.

    I mean seriously look at the numbers.

    @ZOS You will loose your fanbase if you do this.
    (PC NA)
    -Saulo Stamina Sorcerer
    -skillastat Stamina Nightblade
    -a blade spirit Stamina Templar
    -Ultima Online I Magicka Dragonknight
    -'Solo DC* Stamina Sorcerer
    -'Ultima Online Stamina Dragonknight
    -Nerd Dk Tank Dragonknight
    -Solochi Magicka Sorcerer
    -Solo Lucci Magicka Nightblade
    -Sølomon Magicka Warden

    *All characters are EP, except for one DC.


    French Canadian!
  • RainfeatherUK
    RainfeatherUK
    ✭✭✭✭
    I've had hours of debates lately about how F2P and B2P are fully viable, and find myself at a loss about how people can really believe the quality will be maintained.

    Sure GW2 and other games function with these systems but do people here actually play them? The content release rate, lack of in game system expansion and overall content is laughable.

    In honesty I too was a little oblivious to the differences until I went and sat in London and listened to Naoki Yoshida and others from Square, talking about how FFXIV uses the P2P system for only one reason - Its whats required to maintain quality.

    Now again, maybe alot of people havent played FFXIV. Its a traditional MMO design, with a pretty good production quality. Its entirely p2p and has a solid player base.

    Of that crowd there isnt anyone I've met on their game/forums who doesnt appreciate the p2p model.

    Now thats irrelevent here. This is ESO. However; comparitvely FFXIV doesnt have a good many of the features present here. Area scale (design cost?), Full voiceover, and progression systems (spell crafting, dark brotherhood etc) and its still taking a paid expansion next year before it has the kind of money they need to expand its systems properly - and thats after a huge subscriber base has been paying since FFXIV went live.

    To that end a cut in budget in ESO would likely level this game. Don't misread - the game probably wouldnt close.

    But in order to get the content quality, progression systems and otherwise ESO needs to continue developing it would have to borderline encourage pay 2 win cash shop items, or I seriously doubt the budget would come anywhere close.

    Long term that will cripple this games quality. I honestly believe that, having seen the same thing 20 times or so over the last decade.
    Naoki Yoshida - Game Director of FFXIV

    It comes down to what players want, what players want from an MMORPG is that they want updates, they want content, they want something to do and to provide this type of content at a regular pace, high quality content at a regular pace, we need a stable development team system – and to have a stable development team system, you need stable income. Subscription based models give us that stable income.
    Edited by RainfeatherUK on January 7, 2015 8:42AM
  • Leijona
    Leijona
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    Regarding FFXIV: I loved the fact, that they have updates, that actually work. And last time I played it, they were still able to achieve this without a test server.
    I would hope ZOS were able to get even close to SE regarding that.

    At the moment, B2P and F2P wouldn't make that much of a difference. It is not as if you would have to pay quite an amount of money to start playing the game.
  • The_Sadist
    The_Sadist
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    Probably not, though GW2 was quite enjoyable despite being F2P (well, you had to buy the box.. but still!).
    "Each event is preceded by Prophecy. But without the hero, there is no Event." ― Zurin Arctus, the Underking.
    Tragrim - How do I work this thing?
    Casually stalking the forums
  • DDuke
    DDuke
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    ✭✭✭✭
    The_Sadist wrote: »
    Probably not, though GW2 was quite enjoyable despite being F2P (well, you had to buy the box.. but still!).

    Is that the GW2 with the awesome end game content & regular updates?

    The one where you don't have to pay 10$ to have more than one crafting specialization, or pay additional 60$ to get maximum storage space?

    Right...

    Makes me sick just looking at it:
    http://wiki.guildwars2.com/wiki/Gem_Store

    And this is one of the "best case scenarios".
    Edited by DDuke on January 7, 2015 12:46PM
  • HBK
    HBK
    Doesn't matter to me as such. F2P is just a business model. A business model I despise for various reasons. But I don't play games for their business model.

    Still, if the game gets worse, I'll leave.

    Tread carefully.

    Edit: On a side note, it's funny to see that when the subbing model was first introduced, everyone was shocked that you'd have to pay a monthly fee to be able to play the game you already paid (the game box itself). No one was willing to pay (or so they said).

    At the time, I was one of the dudes saying it was a logical model, especially if it comes with constant and regular updates (and maintaining servers costs money).

    Now everyone misses the subbing model. And for good reasons I'm afraid.

    Man I hate it when I'm right :(
    Edited by HBK on January 7, 2015 1:02PM
  • RinaldoGandolphi
    RinaldoGandolphi
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    ✭✭✭✭
    if this game goes F2P i'll be out period. F2P always ends up with you paying more, important content/items/etc being hidden behind a paywall, and being nickeled and dimed to death at every turn.

    I really hope ZOS is smart enough not to go this route. If this game does end up F2P, I suspect it will be primarily because Xbox Live/PSN won't let them play ESO without having a "gold membership" and selling a sub based game that already requires a sub to the consoles online access will be a tough sell.

    I personally think they wasted precious time and money even bringing the game to console in the first place. MMO's have always been a PC thing, it just doesn't fit on console, MMO just doesn't feel right without a keyboard. its a different style of game then what consoles are designed for, they will make ti work im sure, but it will be clunky and unnatural due to the lack of a keyboard.

    I know ZOS is hoping for a big sales turn out for the console version, hoping to capitalize on Skyrim's success, but with the way the negative press has hammered this game over the months, that window of opportunity may be closed now.

    Really lets face facts, 1.6 is a whole new game pretty much, its not tweaking or an update, its a new game. This is public admission of failure, they are changing the game completely into a different game in less then one year.

    Let that sink into your head for a second:

    ESO after 1.6 will be unrecognizable to the game you bought in April less then one year ago

    So we will have a completely new game with 1.6 less then a year after release. This doesn't bode well, infact it speaks of knee jerk reactions. The actual game itself right now would be Ok if they:

    Fixed the bugs in the game
    Fixed the Lag in PVP
    Properly balanced the class lines currently available.

    instead, they are putting in an entirely different system, in essence an entirely different game, in less then a year after launch.

    I hope it works out, but if 1.6 is a failure, it may be the nail in the coffin for this game. As if 1.6 is not what folks want, and don't fix what it is expected, you will see a mass exodus of players in droves. So time will tell what the future may hold, but if this game goes F2P that gurantees i'll be out, no ands, ifs, or buts.
    Rinaldo Gandolphi-Breton Sorcerer Daggerfall Covenant
    Juste Gandolphi Dark Elf Templar Daggerfall Covenant
    Richter Gandolphi - Dark Elf Dragonknight Daggerfall Covenant
    Mathias Gandolphi - Breton Nightblade Daggerfall Covenant
    RinaldoGandolphi - High Elf Sorcerer Aldmeri Dominion
    Officer Fire and Ice
    Co-GM - MVP



    Sorcerer's - The ONLY class in the game that is punished for using its class defining skill (Bolt Escape)

    "Here in his shrine, that they have forgotten. Here do we toil, that we might remember. By night we reclaim, what by day was stolen. Far from ourselves, he grows ever near to us. Our eyes once were blinded, now through him do we see. Our hands once were idle, now through them does he speak. And when the world shall listen, and when the world shall see, and when the world remembers, that world will cease to be. - Miraak

  • seanvwolf
    seanvwolf
    ✭✭✭✭
    I state "I won't stay" because in all likelihood I wouldn't. It doesn't mean the game would be a failure, as I have already had countless hours of fun and feel the purchase and subscription has already paid for itself in pure game value. This is already a complete game. As for why I'd leave, it has more to do with the type of community that frequents F2P model games.

    No Foreseeable Leverage or Interest
    The majority of individuals who F2P hop have no vested interest in maintaining the community, gameplay, or development of the game state. They'll get their 2 or three months of play, perhaps with a guild, till they are bored and instead of demanding for better game mechaincs (or demanding without predictable leverage), they will simply find the next big F2P and do the same thing there.

    No Initial Investment Required
    This is a huge thing... If you don't have to pay to setup an account, then you don't have to feel obligated to direct the game as a trial consumer. People will hop in to farm with bots and snipe customers with low deals with no real interest in actually playing the game. They'll target other trial costumers who are actively interested in the game and cheat them or spam them. It's a horrible experience and I don't want ESO back to the way it was in the first few weeks after launch, before ZOS was able to close those accounts of botters.

    The Quality of the Community
    Aside from having no leverage and no investment, the next would be the gateweay that initial investments provide to those who have no intention of ever investing, sub or cashshop, who simply want to grief. It's a little different if the person you are reporting is subbing... because they paid for something that they could possibly loose for breaking the game's Agreements. If there's no sub, there's nothing (really) to loose. The whales will have everything, the trolls will greif everyone, and the subbers will still be silent and in their own bubble ignoring all zone chat and only RPing with their guildmates until the community dies as a whole.

    This isn't to say that sub models don't have these problems, but they seem multiplied exponentially in my experience with F2P models.

    This also isn't to say that all F2P players are whales, trolls, botters or griefers, but you can't blame a subber for automatically assuming this in zone chat in a F2P environment.
    Edited by seanvwolf on January 7, 2015 1:20PM
  • ThyIronFist
    ThyIronFist
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    I would uninstall the game.
    The Elder Zergs Online
    Sainur Ironfist - DK - EU - Ebonheart Pact
    Retired
  • Destai
    Destai
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    ✭✭✭
    Someone mentioned LoTRO and f2p, same thing here. It destroys the culture and authenticity of game. I refuse to support that. Buy to play and subscription are the only acceptable models for me. If a producer doesn't charge me for a product up front, that tells me the game isn't valued as it should be. As such, I refuse to support that lack of self respect. LoTRO is what turned my indifference to hatred, supported by Rift and SWTOR transitions. I hope this, Wildstar, and FF14 all keep their subs. Let the fail games become f2p. Let the real games maintain their dignity.
  • skillastat
    skillastat
    ✭✭✭✭
    Destai wrote: »
    Let the fail games become f2p. Let the real games maintain their dignity.

    This

    (PC NA)
    -Saulo Stamina Sorcerer
    -skillastat Stamina Nightblade
    -a blade spirit Stamina Templar
    -Ultima Online I Magicka Dragonknight
    -'Solo DC* Stamina Sorcerer
    -'Ultima Online Stamina Dragonknight
    -Nerd Dk Tank Dragonknight
    -Solochi Magicka Sorcerer
    -Solo Lucci Magicka Nightblade
    -Sølomon Magicka Warden

    *All characters are EP, except for one DC.


    French Canadian!
  • Turelus
    Turelus
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    Depends how well it's handled.

    If it's SWTOR style where everything ever worth having comes from the cash shop instead of gameplay than no.
    @Turelus - EU PC Megaserver
    "Don't count on others for help. In the end each of us is in this alone. The survivors are those who know how to look out for themselves."
  • Milf_Hero
    Milf_Hero
    ✭✭✭
    well, from time to time, I ask myself, did I enjoy playing today? 60% of the time, id say no. 30% of the time it felt like a waste of time but at least I did something right? and 10% of the time id say yeah. SO for the 40% of the time halfway enjoying the game, if it goes f2p, at least don't have to fork up money for it. As long as they don't put stupid micro transactions that make it the only way to play. You can't do this dungeon if you whole group does pay for buffs. You cant do anything in pvp with out paying real life money for siege weapons. You can buy the best weapons and armor from the game website. crap like that, is...

    UNFORGIVABLE!!! :angry::angry::angry:
    Edited by Milf_Hero on January 8, 2015 9:04AM
    You name it, and ill kill it.
  • Elloa
    Elloa
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    ✭✭
    This is my stance on F2P explained in this video


    h3FFt73.png

  • Zed
    Zed
    ✭✭✭
    I hope Zenimax Online see this.

    I mean seriously look at the numbers.

    @ZOS You will loose your fanbase if you do this.

    Fans don't matter. Any fans lost during a transition will be replaced by the flood of new players, some of whom will likely be willing to spend more money in a single month than what a six month subscription cost.
    Spend spend spend! 'Cause you don't know any better.
  • lorgar_ESO
    lorgar_ESO
    Soul Shriven
    I have played this game is because it 'wasn't' F2P.
  • Justan
    Justan
    ✭✭
    No, I won't. I've been playing MMO's since they were just MUD's, and even still some MUD's have sub fee's and the content they get for it remains. I've never seen an MMO improve by going f2p. The quality of content is always lost and in return we get quality of spending via cash shops. Quite honestly, f2p = greed over gameplay
  • gunplummer
    gunplummer
    ✭✭✭
    if it goes f2p i will most likely convert to console and look for another sub pc mmo. I think with f2p it would be to easy for hacks and bots to take over again. I remember the early days when there was standing room only in the bot filled dungeons and the wall hacks in PvP. Sorry, but no thank you.
  • squidgod2000b14_ESO
    Depends on the transition (and it'll be to B2P, not F2P--Zenimax won't pass up the box sale money from console launch) and what happens to PC players--especially people like me sitting on a few GTCs.

    Honestly, any transition from sub to no sub will seriously hurt the current PC playerbase, though given the moves Zenimax has made since launch, I'm not sure they're too worried about that. The focus has always been console sales.
  • liquid_wolf
    liquid_wolf
    ✭✭✭✭
    I can't support a F2P game as the focus transforms into trying to obtain money and funding. Development, design, and even bug fixes take a back-seat to the cash-shop, costumes, and time/action barriers.

    The requirement for a person to become invested into the MMORPG disappears. Why do you care about something that didn't cost you anything?

    It simply isn't worthwhile for me to invest my time and energy into a F2P game.
  • wiz12268b14_ESO
    wiz12268b14_ESO
    ✭✭✭
    People that leave games BECAUSE theyre free to play must not be playing any MMOs anymore, at least not ones made in the past decade.

  • liquid_wolf
    liquid_wolf
    ✭✭✭✭
    People that leave games BECAUSE theyre free to play must not be playing any MMOs anymore, at least not ones made in the past decade.

    You are not incorrect... I've pretty much stopped playing anything that didn't require some kind of investment from me.

    I just have no interest in games that are F2P... or they communities they tend to create.
  • same_old_roger
    do you think they will reply ?
  • eventide03b14a_ESO
    eventide03b14a_ESO
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    ✭✭
    Brandalf wrote: »
    Inklings wrote: »
    doesn't mater, already unsubed.

    Can I have your stuff?

    What stuff? There isn't any crap in this game that is so difficult to get that you need to beg people that are leaving. Seriously. Even if you just want rare mats all you have to do is put a few passive points in and log in and collect it. There isn't much in this game that requires more than minimal effort.
    :trollin:
  • eventide03b14a_ESO
    eventide03b14a_ESO
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    ✭✭
    F2P becomes pay to win. I have no desire to play game that is solely dependent on my bank account.
    :trollin:
  • kenpachi480
    kenpachi480
    ✭✭✭
    I will leave the game. and stop supporting it. lore storyies. or even the return of the dwemer could not get me back.. Zenimax will be reduced to the same status as EA for me.. complete boycott.

    i supported the game. somehow got banned on facebook. most likely my own fault. but I still love the game and will want to support it unless it goes F2P

    ESO going F2P will be the biggest bitchslap one can possible receive and no goodybag is gonna make up for that.
    Pain and Dead are the cost to the enjoyment of Battle

    Captain Otter Wildwater - DK - V12 - EP
    GoS Vassal - Templar - V16 - EP
    Captain Izanagi Tsukiko - Sorc - still lvling - EP

    Best selfclaimed Healer of Ebonheart Pact NA
  • DDuke
    DDuke
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    ✭✭✭✭
    People that leave games BECAUSE theyre free to play must not be playing any MMOs anymore, at least not ones made in the past decade.

    Nope, because they tend to be garbage.

    Last good MMO was WoW.
  • KiriX
    KiriX
    ✭✭✭
    ZOS, don't even think about F2P!!!
    Best choice is leave payment as is. I don't want even B2P.
    P2P is the best model.
    Edited by KiriX on January 11, 2015 1:43AM
    PC EU
  • Aidantwab16_ESO
    Aidantwab16_ESO
    ✭✭✭
    The communities that I've encountered, flooding along with F2p have been absolutely horrible. I'd consider the (what I atleast, regard as) excellent and friendly community atmosphere in this game, is just as much a feature and asset as any content built by the developers.
    Edited by Aidantwab16_ESO on January 11, 2015 1:58AM
Sign In or Register to comment.