I've heard that there is a secret achievement you can unlock by starting a new thread on this subject.Why..Why another topic...
onlinegamer1 wrote: »
onlinegamer1 wrote: »
You claim they "must" credit is with more points simply because we have been playing longer than other players.
The Terms of Service state they are under absolutely no obligation to do so.
Can agree with the logic included in your wishful thinking, but it is still wishful thinking.
onlinegamer1 wrote: »onlinegamer1 wrote: »
You claim they "must" credit is with more points simply because we have been playing longer than other players.
The Terms of Service state they are under absolutely no obligation to do so.
Can agree with the logic included in your wishful thinking, but it is still wishful thinking.
Translation: I still can't refute the logic in the OP.
onlinegamer1 wrote: »onlinegamer1 wrote: »
You claim they "must" credit is with more points simply because we have been playing longer than other players.
The Terms of Service state they are under absolutely no obligation to do so.
Can agree with the logic included in your wishful thinking, but it is still wishful thinking.
Translation: I still can't refute the logic in the OP.
Not attempting to refute the logic in the OP, personally agree that rewarding progression where it is due makes logical sense.
He's not refuting it. He's explaining why your logic doesn't matter.onlinegamer1 wrote: »Translation: I still can't refute the logic in the OP.
He's not refuting it. He's explaining why your logic doesn't matter.onlinegamer1 wrote: »Translation: I still can't refute the logic in the OP.
onlinegamer1 wrote: »onlinegamer1 wrote: »onlinegamer1 wrote: »
You claim they "must" credit is with more points simply because we have been playing longer than other players.
The Terms of Service state they are under absolutely no obligation to do so.
Can agree with the logic included in your wishful thinking, but it is still wishful thinking.
Translation: I still can't refute the logic in the OP.
Not attempting to refute the logic in the OP, personally agree that rewarding progression where it is due makes logical sense.
They why did you bother to post?
onlinegamer1 wrote: »onlinegamer1 wrote: »onlinegamer1 wrote: »
You claim they "must" credit is with more points simply because we have been playing longer than other players.
The Terms of Service state they are under absolutely no obligation to do so.
Can agree with the logic included in your wishful thinking, but it is still wishful thinking.
Translation: I still can't refute the logic in the OP.
Not attempting to refute the logic in the OP, personally agree that rewarding progression where it is due makes logical sense.
They why did you bother to post?
onlinegamer1 wrote: »onlinegamer1 wrote: »onlinegamer1 wrote: »
You claim they "must" credit is with more points simply because we have been playing longer than other players.
The Terms of Service state they are under absolutely no obligation to do so.
Can agree with the logic included in your wishful thinking, but it is still wishful thinking.
Translation: I still can't refute the logic in the OP.
Not attempting to refute the logic in the OP, personally agree that rewarding progression where it is due makes logical sense.
They why did you bother to post?
Because everything is already set in stone, and there is no hint of them ever reverting it.
Also your topic will most likely get closed, due to "other topics already made on this subject".
onlinegamer1 wrote: »onlinegamer1 wrote: »onlinegamer1 wrote: »
You claim they "must" credit is with more points simply because we have been playing longer than other players.
The Terms of Service state they are under absolutely no obligation to do so.
Can agree with the logic included in your wishful thinking, but it is still wishful thinking.
Translation: I still can't refute the logic in the OP.
Not attempting to refute the logic in the OP, personally agree that rewarding progression where it is due makes logical sense.
They why did you bother to post?
For the same reason you did: because it doesn't matter anyway.
onlinegamer1 wrote: »onlinegamer1 wrote: »onlinegamer1 wrote: »onlinegamer1 wrote: »
You claim they "must" credit is with more points simply because we have been playing longer than other players.
The Terms of Service state they are under absolutely no obligation to do so.
Can agree with the logic included in your wishful thinking, but it is still wishful thinking.
Translation: I still can't refute the logic in the OP.
Not attempting to refute the logic in the OP, personally agree that rewarding progression where it is due makes logical sense.
They why did you bother to post?
Because everything is already set in stone, and there is no hint of them ever reverting it.
Also your topic will most likely get closed, due to "other topics already made on this subject".
Both of those are patently false.
onlinegamer1 wrote: »onlinegamer1 wrote: »onlinegamer1 wrote: »onlinegamer1 wrote: »
You claim they "must" credit is with more points simply because we have been playing longer than other players.
The Terms of Service state they are under absolutely no obligation to do so.
Can agree with the logic included in your wishful thinking, but it is still wishful thinking.
Translation: I still can't refute the logic in the OP.
Not attempting to refute the logic in the OP, personally agree that rewarding progression where it is due makes logical sense.
They why did you bother to post?
Because everything is already set in stone, and there is no hint of them ever reverting it.
Also your topic will most likely get closed, due to "other topics already made on this subject".
Both of those are patently false.
If they close this topic, will you give me 100k?
onlinegamer1 wrote: »onlinegamer1 wrote: »onlinegamer1 wrote: »onlinegamer1 wrote: »onlinegamer1 wrote: »
You claim they "must" credit is with more points simply because we have been playing longer than other players.
The Terms of Service state they are under absolutely no obligation to do so.
Can agree with the logic included in your wishful thinking, but it is still wishful thinking.
Translation: I still can't refute the logic in the OP.
Not attempting to refute the logic in the OP, personally agree that rewarding progression where it is due makes logical sense.
They why did you bother to post?
Because everything is already set in stone, and there is no hint of them ever reverting it.
Also your topic will most likely get closed, due to "other topics already made on this subject".
Both of those are patently false.
If they close this topic, will you give me 100k?
Of course not, because it could get closed due to someone coming in and flaming or lots of other reasons.
nerevarine1138 wrote: »onlinegamer1 wrote: »onlinegamer1 wrote: »onlinegamer1 wrote: »onlinegamer1 wrote: »onlinegamer1 wrote: »
You claim they "must" credit is with more points simply because we have been playing longer than other players.
The Terms of Service state they are under absolutely no obligation to do so.
Can agree with the logic included in your wishful thinking, but it is still wishful thinking.
Translation: I still can't refute the logic in the OP.
Not attempting to refute the logic in the OP, personally agree that rewarding progression where it is due makes logical sense.
They why did you bother to post?
Because everything is already set in stone, and there is no hint of them ever reverting it.
Also your topic will most likely get closed, due to "other topics already made on this subject".
Both of those are patently false.
If they close this topic, will you give me 100k?
Of course not, because it could get closed due to someone coming in and flaming or lots of other reasons.
My vote is for it being a duplicate (triplicate, quadruplicate, quintuplicate, etc.) thread. Was there a reason you felt you couldn't post your thoughts in the existing thread(s)?
onlinegamer1 wrote: »Translation: I still can't refute the logic in the OP.
tinythinker wrote: »
While I agree that it is most plausible to assume that avoiding damage to the game has a very high priority at ZOS, I'd say that we must simply wait and see if taking away earned progression from players does damage the game. Will the majority of players leave? Or will it lead to a more balanced situation, e.g. in Cyrodiil, such that many players keep playing? Will the justice system and the possibilities of the champion system offer such a big incentive to keep playing that even those players that are mad about lost progression still keep playing? Or is there even some other option between granting CPs and taking away progression that we can't imagine now but that compensates for the loss of progression?
onlinegamer1 wrote: »*snip*
onlinegamer1 wrote: »While I agree that it is most plausible to assume that avoiding damage to the game has a very high priority at ZOS, I'd say that we must simply wait and see if taking away earned progression from players does damage the game. Will the majority of players leave? Or will it lead to a more balanced situation, e.g. in Cyrodiil, such that many players keep playing? Will the justice system and the possibilities of the champion system offer such a big incentive to keep playing that even those players that are mad about lost progression still keep playing? Or is there even some other option between granting CPs and taking away progression that we can't imagine now but that compensates for the loss of progression?
You really don't get it. Lets do a short timeline example:
1. Update 1.6 goes live, some players have 0 CPs, others 30 CPs. Also VR levels.
2. A few weeks goes by. CPs are now no longer even. Some people have many, some still have 0. New players still purchase the game and start level 1 characters.
3. Update 1.7 goes live. VR levels are removed. CPs are no where near level, and vary greatly. There are still new players buying the game making level 1 characters with 0 CPs.
4. 3 months go by. Players with lots and lots of CPs are far more powerful than players with none.
So, where is this "leveling" of the playing field? The only thing ZOS would accomplish by NOT reimbursing players for VR levels when 1.7 goes live is damaging the game, and losing revenue. There is no upside.