Akarius_Alexios wrote: »I was immediately contacted by a GameMaster who told me not to spam.
KhajitFurTrader wrote: »I would be interested to know how the OP knew it was an official ZOS GM who was telling him off, since they usually don't watch things proactively, but only react to complaints, and this almost never happens immediately. At the very least the request to escalate the matter should have been granted without argument.
KhajitFurTrader wrote: »Akarius_Alexios wrote: »I was immediately contacted by a GameMaster who told me not to spam.
So tell me, did you see the hallmarks of an official GM in your conversation with him? Otherwise I'd assume that you were being fooled by an imposter, which in itself is a violation of the CoC. Please refrain from posting names, or screenshots with visible names here, because naming and shaming isn't allowed either.
ZOS cannot possibly have a specialized policy for every single activity a player may be doing that would somehow be frowned upon.
@Akarius_Alexios: GMs supposedly have a [Z] icon before their name. Maybe you could post the screenshot of the exchange after editing out the exact name but keeping the [Z] icon.
@ZOS_GaryA
Akarius_Alexios wrote: »Hello,
I was recently in Grahtwood bank working on some equipment. I had a set of armor created, but had not applied enchants, food buffs, or assigned my character stats (recently reset). I decided to see how many breath of life heals I could cast before running out of magicka before I added any stats, food, or enchants.
I cast 6 breath of life spells. I'm hoping I can at least double that with the increases I planned.
I was immediately contacted by a GameMaster who told me not to spam. I told the GameMaster that I was not spamming anyone, but that I had cast a total of 6 spells while testing an armor set. The GameMaster indicated that I was disruptive for casting the 6 spells and that spamming was not allowed. I disagreed and asked for the issue to be escalated. The GameMaster refused. He asked that I not cast any spells at the bank and threatened to take action against my account if I did cast any further spells at the bank.
I complied with his request, but indicated I would be taking the matter to the forums for clarification of policy and hopefully some retraining for this GameMaster. I took screenshots of the conversation and had originally planned to post them so that there would be no question as to the conversation that took place. As my question is to policy, I don't believe the screen shots are critical as to the clarification. However, if any Zenimax employee would like to see the screen shots I will be happy to supply them. The GameMaster in question refused to name his supervisor or let me communicate with the supervisor, but stated that the supervisor agreed with his position.
1. Is casting spells at a bank allowed? If not, where is notice posted that players should not cast spells at the bank. I was told to not cast any spells at the bank yet I see people do it all the time.
2. If casting spells at the bank is allowed, is casting 6 spells while testing equipment considered spamming? If 6 spells is not spamming, what amount of spells could reasonably be considered spamming? If it's not the number of spells, but the casting AT players that matters, does breath of life qualify as harassment when cast 6 times at a bank?
3. What is the best way to escalate an issue when a player disagrees with a GameMaster, but agrees to comply until a review can be made? How can a player be certain that the matter will not simply be referred back to the GameMaster with whom the player disagrees?
I'm really hoping this experience was not an example of the customer service Zenimax provides as a whole.
Please advise.
Akarius Alexios
jamesharv2005ub17_ESO wrote: »This isnt starbucks. Its a video game. The GM asked you not to do something and you threw a fit. Grow up follow the rules. If you want to test stuff find someplace besides the bank to do it. Simple.
[...]
What you were doing is somewhat like taking flash pictures in a crowded low light setting, over and over again, or talking loudly on a cell phone in a restaurant. You can't go to jail for it and most places aren't going to hand you a notice saying they're going to kick you out if you do it, but a waiter or manager is likely to ask you to stop and maybe threaten to kick you out if you don't.
I understand you weren't deliberately griefing; however, you were being inconsiderate of other people's game experience. Testing your mana capacity for casting a spell multiple times is something that should be done outside.
[...]
Akarius_Alexios wrote: »@Akarius_Alexios: GMs supposedly have a [Z] icon before their name. Maybe you could post the screenshot of the exchange after editing out the exact name but keeping the [Z] icon.
@ZOS_GaryA
If anyone at Zenimax wants the screen shots I can provide them. If they want me to post them here with the GM's name removed -- I can do that as well. I don't think they are necessary for Zenimax to answer my policy questions but if Zenimax wants them posted I will do so.
I have been pulling different gear sets and testing healing and adjusting my sets at the bank since this game started. I have never had an issue. If a player were to message me and tell me it hurt their eyes, they were hung over and it was like God shouting in their ear, or whatever -- I'd just move across the room to the other bank. Some people are sensitive and I get that. This was six spells and a GM starts pushing around a paying customer.
It's like me walking into a starbucks, paying for a coffee, sitting down and beginning to sip it.
A starbucks employee walks over and says, "Sir, the other customers heard you sip your coffee six times. Please, no more sipping in the restaurant."
But I only sipped like everyone else who sipped! I wasn't any louder.
"I know sir, but it is harassing the other customers and spamming sips. If you do not stop, I will remove you from the store."
It was only six sips and this place is dedicated to sipping coffee. Let me speak to your manager.
"Sir, I'm the one assigned to handle this issue. I can't give you my manager's name or a means to contact him, but he would agree with me."
I look around the room and I see two types of people. Those who think taking 6 sips in starbucks should be reasonable and they continue to try to sneak sips behind their coat. The second type of people think anything a starbucks employee asks of a paying customer to do is reasonable -- so they are drinking their coffee through straws.
I just want to sip my coffee in peace.
Spamming is a relative term; if someone reported you for spamming, then to that person, yes, six spells was spamming. I bet the policy has something in it like "It's spamming if other players report it as such."
I agree about the escalation thing, but other than that it kind of sounds like the gamemaster was just doing their job. Just a matter of wrong place,wrong time for you.
Akarius_Alexios wrote: »jamesharv2005ub17_ESO wrote: »This isnt starbucks. Its a video game. The GM asked you not to do something and you threw a fit. Grow up follow the rules. If you want to test stuff find someplace besides the bank to do it. Simple.
No, this most certainly isn't starbucks. That was an analogy meant to show my issue in other terms so that it could be compared and contrasted.
You don't need to tell me to 'grow up'. It adds nothing to the discussion. It is interesting you state to follow the rules. In this case, what is the rule? Whatever any given GM states them to be? In my case, the rule that was enforced is that I could not cast a single spell at the bank from that point forward. You have never cast a single spell at the bank? Ever?
What this boils down to is whether a paying customer (that's all of us) should have their account threatened for casting 6 spells because 6 spells bothered another player. This happened to take place at a bank. Because the GM was quoting code of conduct policy that is not bank specific -- it could have been anywhere. Get a new sword in a public delve and want to give it a few swings? Not so fast, one of the players there doesn't like you swinging it 6 times. Amazed with all the cool emotes in the game? Just don't try 6 of them near other players at a guild vendor. Am I the only one who sees the absurdity of this position?
It's not like I did not comply with the GMs request. I was careful not to cast a single spell at the bank after my interaction with the GM.
An official response from Zenimax would be very much appreciated.
Nazon_Katts wrote: »Ah, I see where your problem is.
Everyone at Starbucks is just sipping their coffees, indeed. Except you and your buddies, who are gargling with it and snorting it through straws back into the cups, just to rinse and repeat that process the whole time.
Doesn't really matter how many times or even why you do that, it'll always be highly annoying to everyone else around you. Well except me maybe, but I do tend to have a sense for juvenile humor.
jamesharv2005ub17_ESO wrote: »They already gave you an official response. The GM said do not cast multiple spells "testing stuff" inside the bank. Do it outside.