This is a game , you play for fun . it's not a job in a factory ... ( grinding it's always like a boring job for me).
I think if zos give 30 cp per account it's mostly for testing purpose ( xp per cp player earn , balancing stuff ...)
the only mistake they made is to tell " we track the xp for the cp system" and i'm sure some grind like mad only for the purpose of beating the others player like " lolol111 !!! i'm rocks you with my 600 cp build ! nooobzz" ...
" grinding it's always like a boring job for me" <= And what do you think WE, the people playing since day one, the people who have been subbed non stop to this game, the most dedicated players of the game, are going to have to do in order to get more Champion points?
Most of our characters are VR14 with most if not all quests done. The only thing left for us is grind to get Champion points, when people (prolly like you) who aren't VR14, only have to quest & explore to get Champion points. So people are raging because new players will have an advantage over old players regarding Champion points earnings. How the f* is that logical?
you play like a complesionist grinder( i see your sign with timer on AA stuff) and you acuse me of not playing like you . You can be "dedicated" to a game with different style of play ( RP, PVP, high end dungeon grinder, complesionist , crafting...) and be a part of this game .
What you want is just an edge against others players because "i play like this and this way normally give me superiority on others" , in fact i dont care if you have 0 to 600 CP at the launch of the 1.6 but i think it's better for the game to have a low CP at the launch.
maybe they can give 1 CP per VR on the account , this put the max to 102 pts.
ian92415b14_ESO wrote: »A vr14 with a dedicated armor set already has a distinct advantage over a fresh vr1 wearing pug gear so as long as the cp gap isn't more than that (which is huge) it should be good to go.
I will change my vote to Yes if they bring back the 14400 CP instead of the 3600 they thought was more appropriate after internal testing.
If we want ZOS to keep their word even if it goes against feedback they received and the results of testing, then they should keep EVERYTHING as originally stated, whether it's workable or not.
I don't care about that, be fine, BUT doesn't really make the fact the "changed" the amount fair. If they reduced the points to 25% of what it was, then that same rate should just apply to what they were going to give players. That's not reason to not give v14s more than v1s.
What we really need to know is if they plan on some further point work coming with vet ranks are removed.
Real question should have been: Do you think ZOS should keep their promise & award Champion Points according to the XP they said they where tracking?