Unfortunately, EP was infected with said chimp playstyle.OrangeTheCat wrote: »
Yes. Can't name player names or guild names for fear of the "naming and shaming" policy (or worse), but yes: When the-guild-that-shall-not-be-named was on AD, the other AD guilds gave them a lot of shister for their play style and their general attitude. The-guild-that-shall-not-be-named got bent out of shape about it and, given all the complaining about the population imbalance and the begging for people to roll EP at that time, switched to EP. That's it in a nutshell. So here we are.
Unfortunately, EP was infected with said chimp playstyle.OrangeTheCat wrote: »
Yes. Can't name player names or guild names for fear of the "naming and shaming" policy (or worse), but yes: When the-guild-that-shall-not-be-named was on AD, the other AD guilds gave them a lot of shister for their play style and their general attitude. The-guild-that-shall-not-be-named got bent out of shape about it and, given all the complaining about the population imbalance and the begging for people to roll EP at that time, switched to EP. That's it in a nutshell. So here we are.
Unfortunately, EP was infected with said chimp playstyle.OrangeTheCat wrote: »
Yes. Can't name player names or guild names for fear of the "naming and shaming" policy (or worse), but yes: When the-guild-that-shall-not-be-named was on AD, the other AD guilds gave them a lot of shister for their play style and their general attitude. The-guild-that-shall-not-be-named got bent out of shape about it and, given all the complaining about the population imbalance and the begging for people to roll EP at that time, switched to EP. That's it in a nutshell. So here we are.
Unfortunately, EP was infected with said chimp playstyle.OrangeTheCat wrote: »
Yes. Can't name player names or guild names for fear of the "naming and shaming" policy (or worse), but yes: When the-guild-that-shall-not-be-named was on AD, the other AD guilds gave them a lot of shister for their play style and their general attitude. The-guild-that-shall-not-be-named got bent out of shape about it and, given all the complaining about the population imbalance and the begging for people to roll EP at that time, switched to EP. That's it in a nutshell. So here we are.
RadioheadSh0t wrote: »Unfortunately, EP was infected with said chimp playstyle.OrangeTheCat wrote: »
Yes. Can't name player names or guild names for fear of the "naming and shaming" policy (or worse), but yes: When the-guild-that-shall-not-be-named was on AD, the other AD guilds gave them a lot of shister for their play style and their general attitude. The-guild-that-shall-not-be-named got bent out of shape about it and, given all the complaining about the population imbalance and the begging for people to roll EP at that time, switched to EP. That's it in a nutshell. So here we are.
The best players/guilds in DC do the exact same thing... Just because you want to play a suboptimal style of play doesn't mean the actual good players don't.
Adapt or die, it's simple as that.
I choose die.RadioheadSh0t wrote: »Unfortunately, EP was infected with said chimp playstyle.OrangeTheCat wrote: »
Yes. Can't name player names or guild names for fear of the "naming and shaming" policy (or worse), but yes: When the-guild-that-shall-not-be-named was on AD, the other AD guilds gave them a lot of shister for their play style and their general attitude. The-guild-that-shall-not-be-named got bent out of shape about it and, given all the complaining about the population imbalance and the begging for people to roll EP at that time, switched to EP. That's it in a nutshell. So here we are.
The best players/guilds in DC do the exact same thing... Just because you want to play a suboptimal style of play doesn't mean the actual good players don't.
Adapt or die, it's simple as that.
RadioheadSh0t wrote: »Unfortunately, EP was infected with said chimp playstyle.OrangeTheCat wrote: »
Yes. Can't name player names or guild names for fear of the "naming and shaming" policy (or worse), but yes: When the-guild-that-shall-not-be-named was on AD, the other AD guilds gave them a lot of shister for their play style and their general attitude. The-guild-that-shall-not-be-named got bent out of shape about it and, given all the complaining about the population imbalance and the begging for people to roll EP at that time, switched to EP. That's it in a nutshell. So here we are.
The best players/guilds in DC do the exact same thing... Just because you want to play a suboptimal style of play doesn't mean the actual good players don't.
Adapt or die, it's simple as that.
Yes, a lot of AD players transferred to EP last campaign cycle.
Dang. c'mon EP....... gate camping????? Are you serious?????? Have you people really become that concerned about winning over a video game?:(
sigh...... hopefully this does not last for long. I would hate to see the one competitive campaign turn into Hopesfire.
Yes, a lot of AD players transferred to EP last campaign cycle.Dang. c'mon EP....... gate camping????? Are you serious?????? Have you people really become that concerned about winning over a video game?:(
sigh...... hopefully this does not last for long. I would hate to see the one competitive campaign turn into Hopesfire.
Put these two together before you condemn all of EP.
Princess_Asgari wrote: »Didn't like half of AD roll EP? Of course EP will do what AD did now lol
Princess_Asgari wrote: »Didn't like half of AD roll EP? Of course EP will do what AD did now lol
I think im just going to stick wiht my DC toon for awhile. lol. at least until the impulse blobers decide to roll DC.
Princess_Asgari wrote: »Didn't like half of AD roll EP? Of course EP will do what AD did now lol
I think im just going to stick wiht my DC toon for awhile. lol. at least until the impulse blobers decide to roll DC.
We on DC actively ridicule and deride the pulse chimp spam behavior. The game is turning into Elder Chimp Spam Online
FluffiestOne wrote: »Rest now, my child, as I freed Hopesfire, again I shalt do upon Thornblade. FOR I AM FIXATE, THAT WHICH IS AND WHICH ISN'T, WHAT CAN BE, AND IS FORGOTTEN. FOLLOW ME, AND I WILL LEAD YOU TO VICTORY AND HONOR. ALL. HAIL. FIXATE.lel jk EP blob hardcore
Once Havoc joined the Pact it got more common trust me the Pact loves simple and skillful fighting don't judge us all.
Princess_Asgari wrote: »Didn't like half of AD roll EP? Of course EP will do what AD did now lol
I think im just going to stick wiht my DC toon for awhile. lol. at least until the impulse blobers decide to roll DC.
We on DC actively ridicule and deride the pulse chimp spam behavior. The game is turning into Elder Chimp Spam Online
How many oceans and rivers have you filled up with tears and salt.
Firellight wrote: »Once Havoc joined the Pact it got more common trust me the Pact loves simple and skillful fighting don't judge us all.
This. There are EP who are not liking the nightly takeovers. I know some people who didn't want to participate until the map returned to normal during prime time. I like maps to be taken over fairly, one keep at a time, with decent resistance.
I'd actually like to see some proof of EP nightcapping I keep hearing about. I PVP fairly late, usually to 2-3 am PST, and I don't see it. Havoc doesn't have numbers to take maps at night, our groups are usually 12-14 past 12am and dwindle from there. PR dissolves earlier: Hijinx doesn't run groups that late. Vehemence doesn't have numbers that late, Pride doesn't seem to have a late night presence either, same with Hit Squad, Vok. IR is online late, but by that point they're small and mostly farm, they don't really take runs at keeps.
So ummm, who is doing it? My answer is no one, because it's not really a thing. There was one night, when we crowned a Havoc Emp, they he and a few stayed on to mess around and have fun with the Emp bonuses, and we turned the map red. Otherwise? Not even a thing. We do 1-2 late night takeovers and suddenly its equivalent to AD style nightcaping?
Not. Even. Close.
I'd actually like to see some proof of EP nightcapping I keep hearing about. I PVP fairly late, usually to 2-3 am PST, and I don't see it. Havoc doesn't have numbers to take maps at night, our groups are usually 12-14 past 12am and dwindle from there. PR dissolves earlier: Hijinx doesn't run groups that late. Vehemence doesn't have numbers that late, Pride doesn't seem to have a late night presence either, same with Hit Squad, Vok. IR is online late, but by that point they're small and mostly farm, they don't really take runs at keeps.
So ummm, who is doing it? My answer is no one, because it's not really a thing. There was one night, when we crowned a Havoc Emp, they he and a few stayed on to mess around and have fun with the Emp bonuses, and we turned the map red. Otherwise? Not even a thing. We do 1-2 late night takeovers and suddenly its equivalent to AD style nightcaping?
Not. Even. Close.
Not really a thing? This pic was snapped this morning. Since the last day of the last Thorn cycle, this is what North America wakes up to more weekdays than not. Not content to simply own the map and scrolls, there will be EP groups outside of both DC gates, ganking anybody with the gumption to take anything back from them. Presumably they are doing the same to AD in the south.
You may not see it, but it is happening. The vitriol toward the EP groups doing this is real, and it's justified.
ETA - even the fake guild names being used to claim the DC and AD home keeps are meant as mockery by the EP doing this. Two of the tamer examples: Black Boot is currently claimed by an EP guild named "AD Bow [snip]" (but not sensored) and Rayles claimed by an EP guild named 'AoeBBQ-South-Ga".
I understand the offence at being called "the new AD', but that doesn't make it undeserved.
So after last nights capping by EP, I'm assuming the scores are wildly in EP's favour.
What I would really like to know is what the point of even logging in to PvP tomorrow is? I'm assuming there is no coming back from that score deficit and fighting a blob of people that outnumber us 5 to 1 who also have all of the buffs (all scrolls, home keeps and emperor) is not my definition of fun.