Maintenance for the week of March 16:
• PC/Mac: No maintenance – March 16
• ESO Store and Account System for maintenance – March 18, 6:00AM EDT (10:00 UTC) - 4:00PM EDT (20:00 UTC)
• PC/Mac: No maintenance – March 16
• ESO Store and Account System for maintenance – March 18, 6:00AM EDT (10:00 UTC) - 4:00PM EDT (20:00 UTC)
Should ZOS remove 2 campaigns?
Izanagi.Xiiib16_ESO
✭✭✭✭✭
✭✭✭✭
✭✭✭✭
The current game population imo doesnt support so many campaigns. In addtion to this Azura, Haderus and Chill have just become PVE buff campaigns.
My vote is to remove Haderus and Chillrend as 30 day campaigns are more popular and give a greater sense of accomplishment for battling over a month to win something.
It would be better to remove 2 campaigns now before Imperial City is released and buff campaigns become even move of a thing.
When this is done all campaigns should be reset back to default settings - home keeps and 2 scrolls and start at 30 days again.
@ZOS_JessicaFolsom @ZOS_GinaBruno @ZOS_BrianWheeler
Edited by Izanagi.Xiiib16_ESO on December 3, 2014 12:16PM My vote is to remove Haderus and Chillrend as 30 day campaigns are more popular and give a greater sense of accomplishment for battling over a month to win something.
It would be better to remove 2 campaigns now before Imperial City is released and buff campaigns become even move of a thing.
When this is done all campaigns should be reset back to default settings - home keeps and 2 scrolls and start at 30 days again.
@ZOS_JessicaFolsom @ZOS_GinaBruno @ZOS_BrianWheeler
@Solar_Breeze
NA ~ Izanerys: Dracarys (Videos | Dracast)
EU ~ Izanagi: Banana Squad (AOE Rats/ Zerg Squad / Roleplay Circle)
NA ~ Izanerys: Dracarys (Videos | Dracast)
EU ~ Izanagi: Banana Squad (AOE Rats/ Zerg Squad / Roleplay Circle)
Should ZOS remove 2 campaigns? 108 votes
Remove Haderus and Chillrend
51%
56 votes
Remove Haderus and Azura's
15%
17 votes
Keep all 4
32%
35 votes
2
-
Turelus✭✭✭✭✭
✭✭✭✭✭Remove Haderus and ChillrendI would like to see the closure of some of these dead campaigns again.
While I understand that some play there for the smaller scale PVP and skirmishing most have once again become nothing but buff and emperor trade campaigns.@Turelus - EU PC Megaserver
"Don't count on others for help. In the end each of us is in this alone. The survivors are those who know how to look out for themselves."1 -
kevlarto_ESO✭✭✭✭✭
✭Remove Haderus and ChillrendI think they need to remove a couple and use those resources for the heavily populated campaign, Thorny could always use a couple more hamsters
1 -
Sublime✭✭✭✭Keep all 4I personally rarely play on Haderus or Chillrend but I think there are People who like to Play on a less populated server (for whatever reason, emp farming/PvE buffing not included).
It would however be a good solution to the AvA buff problem in PvE.EU | For those who want to improve their behaviour: the science behind shaping player bahaviour (presentation)1 -
Armitas✭✭✭✭✭
✭✭✭✭Can't remove haderus because we have cut a small slice of pvp there despite the pve.
I think they should make pvp buffs based on total alliance success rather than individual server success. That would make each server immediately valid. No more 3 buff servers 1 lag server, just 4 servers necessary for success.Retired.
Nord mDK5 -
Izanagi.Xiiib16_ESO✭✭✭✭✭
✭✭✭✭Remove Haderus and ChillrendCan't remove haderus because we have cut a small slice of pvp there despite the pve.
I think they should make pvp buffs based on total alliance success rather than individual server success. That would make each server immediately valid. No more 3 buff servers 1 lag server, just 4 servers necessary for success.
Why would this be any different if you moved to Azuras?@Solar_Breeze
NA ~ Izanerys: Dracarys (Videos | Dracast)
EU ~ Izanagi: Banana Squad (AOE Rats/ Zerg Squad / Roleplay Circle)1 -
McLukos✭✭✭Keep all 4Some people do not like the hardcore style that Thorn turns into. More options are good and PvE in Thorn would just be a pain...1 -
Juraigr✭✭✭✭Remove Haderus and ChillrendYesEU Worst DK , Best DK Singapore and NA also known as 'Special Snowflake'
Jurra - V14 Dragonknight Rank 38 August Palatine
Jurra Hex - V14 Sorcerer Rank 25 Colonel [SEMI-RETIRED until Zos fix this BS sorc nonsense]
LA DK Still OP :P
One of the Three Light Armor DK's
#200StandardOfMightFFS
#RevertAshCloud
#RevertNewAnimations
#RevertUltiGain
#FixMoltenWhip
Grinding my way to August Palatine finally made it, still holding a torch for eso so now imma filthy casual1 -
Lava_Croft✭✭✭✭✭
✭✭✭✭Remove Haderus and ChillrendNow that all the tryhards have their Former Emperor buffs, the campaigns used to obtain said buffs can be closed.1 -
Izanagi.Xiiib16_ESO✭✭✭✭✭
✭✭✭✭Remove Haderus and ChillrendLava_Croft wrote: »Now that all the tryhards have their Former Emperor buffs, the campaigns used to obtain said buffs can be closed.
but I don't have mine yet! :< where can I change my vote...@Solar_Breeze
NA ~ Izanerys: Dracarys (Videos | Dracast)
EU ~ Izanagi: Banana Squad (AOE Rats/ Zerg Squad / Roleplay Circle)0 -
Tavore1138✭✭✭✭✭
✭✭Keep all 4Stupid thread, how does it stop you having fun if other players have a quieter campaign where they get a chance to practice skills & builds before joining the endless queue for the most active campaigns?
Equally just because you choose to look down on other campaigns as 'buff' campaigns doesn't mean that some players don't spend a lot of time defending them against visitors who wish to use them for quickly sneaking an emperor raid and take pride in keeping them free from invasion when they succeed.
Let other people have their fun and go and have yours.6 -
Armitas✭✭✭✭✭
✭✭✭✭Izanagi.Xiiib16_ESO wrote: »Can't remove haderus because we have cut a small slice of pvp there despite the pve.
I think they should make pvp buffs based on total alliance success rather than individual server success. That would make each server immediately valid. No more 3 buff servers 1 lag server, just 4 servers necessary for success.
Why would this be any different if you moved to Azuras?
I wasn't aware there was any sustained pvp there on NA. Is there regular action there?Edited by Armitas on December 3, 2014 1:57PMRetired.
Nord mDK1 -
Izanagi.Xiiib16_ESO✭✭✭✭✭
✭✭✭✭Remove Haderus and ChillrendIzanagi.Xiiib16_ESO wrote: »Can't remove haderus because we have cut a small slice of pvp there despite the pve.
I think they should make pvp buffs based on total alliance success rather than individual server success. That would make each server immediately valid. No more 3 buff servers 1 lag server, just 4 servers necessary for success.
Why would this be any different if you moved to Azuras?
I wasn't aware there was any sustained pvp there on NA. Is there regular action there?
If you took the players from haderus and chill there would be I'm sure.@Solar_Breeze
NA ~ Izanerys: Dracarys (Videos | Dracast)
EU ~ Izanagi: Banana Squad (AOE Rats/ Zerg Squad / Roleplay Circle)2 -
Sanct16✭✭✭✭✭
✭✭Remove Haderus and ChillrendAgree to Izanagi.
- EU - Raid Leader of Banana Zerg Squad
AD | AR 50 | Sanct Fir'eheal | ex Mana DK @31.10.2015
EP | AR 50 | Sanctosaurus | Mana NB
AD | AR 44 | rekt ya | Mana NB
AD | AR 41 | Sanct Thunderstorm | Mana Sorc
EP | AR 36 | S'na'ct | Mana NB {NA}
AD | AR 29 | Captain Full Fist| Stam DK
AD | AR 29 | Sanct The Dark Phoenix| Stam Sorc
EP | AR 16 | Horny Sanct | Stam Warden
EP | AR 16 | Sánct Bánáná Sláyér | Mana DK
DC | AR 13 | ad worst faction eu | Stam Sorc
DC | AR 13 | Lagendary Sanct | Mana NB
>320.000.000 AP1 -
Agrippa_Invisus✭✭✭✭✭
✭✭✭They should remove all four. That way the quality of PVP they've been delivering up to now can be preserved.Agrippa Invisus / Indominus / Inprimis / Inviolatus
DragonKnight / Templar / Warden / Sorcerer - Vagabond
Once a General, now a Citizen
Former Emperor of Bloodthorn and Vivec
For Sweetrolls! FOR FIMIAN!2 -
MiyaTheUnbroken✭✭✭✭I don't think it's necessary to remove two. Removing one would be sufficient. PvP participants won't allow Thorn to become a buff server, that's just never going to happen. Also, if they don't reset the campaigns when they remove one it will encourage competition. Say they remove Azura's since it's 30 day and redundant. Not only will the displaced EP need a new home, but they will be quite upset that the other two factions are soaking in the buffs while they are buffless. So instead of just going to Thorn where everyone knows there will always be action, they will slam into the other buff servers, the residents of which will call to Thorn and PvE for help, and all of the sudden we have three lively servers.Edited by MiyaTheUnbroken on December 3, 2014 2:42PM5
-
LonePirate✭✭✭✭✭
✭✭✭Keep all 4Izanagi.Xiiib16_ESO wrote: »Can't remove haderus because we have cut a small slice of pvp there despite the pve.
I think they should make pvp buffs based on total alliance success rather than individual server success. That would make each server immediately valid. No more 3 buff servers 1 lag server, just 4 servers necessary for success.
Why would this be any different if you moved to Azuras?
I wasn't aware there was any sustained pvp there on NA. Is there regular action there?
All three factions have crowned an emperor on Azura's Star NA during the past day or so. AD and DC crowned theirs during overnight hours while EP crowned theirs during the daytime.
I would not consider the action to be sustained but there are pockets of PVP amidst the PVDooring.
Each of three non-vet campaigns outside of Thorn offer a slightly different dynamic due to the different dominant factions. While the campaigns receive much less action than Thorn, they are not dead by any means.Edited by LonePirate on December 3, 2014 3:24PM0 -
Morvul✭✭✭✭✭Remove Haderus and Chillrend
I don't like Thornblade either (way to much lag), but removing 2 of the other campaigns is a good idea regardless: it will turn the remaining "empty" campaign into a small-scale PvP campaign, instead of the buff-server it currently is on NA / starts to become on EUI have never set foot in Thornblade and have no interest in going into a server that is pop-locked all the time.
I've PvPed in Chillrend (my home campaign) and Azura's and it's been fun.
Edited by Morvul on December 3, 2014 3:43PM1 -
Izanagi.Xiiib16_ESO✭✭✭✭✭
✭✭✭✭Remove Haderus and ChillrendThe main thing is to prevent dilution of the community, yes small scale is fun but you can achieve this on 2 servers currently, 4 servers is too many at least with the population we have now after all this lag, low pop bonus etc.
If you fix it ZOS you may get 10% back but members are going every day now. Don't wait too long to consolidate the servers and fix the lag imo.@Solar_Breeze
NA ~ Izanerys: Dracarys (Videos | Dracast)
EU ~ Izanagi: Banana Squad (AOE Rats/ Zerg Squad / Roleplay Circle)0 -
AlnilamE✭✭✭✭✭
✭✭✭✭✭Keep all 4
I don't like Thornblade either (way to much lag), but removing 2 of the other campaigns is a good idea regardless: it will turn the remaining "empty" campaign into a small-scale PvP campaign, instead of the buff-server it currently is on NA / starts to become on EUI have never set foot in Thornblade and have no interest in going into a server that is pop-locked all the time.
I've PvPed in Chillrend (my home campaign) and Azura's and it's been fun.
Are you sure we wouldn't end up with two pop-locked campaigns?The Moot Councillor2 -
Darklord_Tiberius✭✭✭✭Remove Haderus and ChillrendKeep 2, 30 days campaigns and drop the rest. ZOS really screwed up on this one, worst than they did in Guild Wars 2 with people server jumping. They need to remove guesting and make a home campaign change cost 500k to 1 mil AP.
The PvP in this game is dying faster than it was at launch. Its the same core group out and hardly anyone new can be seen. Recruitment and attendance is down across the board. I know loads of people that refuse to PvP because of how screwed up it is.
The lag issue has to do with people spamming certain healing abilities, many have reported it and all have been ignored. ZOS sucks large donkey balls at listening and communicating to its community.0 -
Rylana✭✭✭✭✭
✭✭✭✭✭Keep all 4Keep all four and reduce the pop cap for thorn to force people to go to the other three.
Literally cut pop cap in half. We have four campaigns for a reason.@rylanadionysis == Closed Beta Tester October 2013 == Retired October 2016 == Uninstalled @ One Tamriel Release == Inactive Indefinitely
Ebonheart Pact: Lyzara Dionysis - Sorc - AR 37 (Former Empress of Blackwater Blade and Haderus) == Shondra Dionysis - Temp - AR 23 == Arrianaya Dionysis - DK - AR 17
Aldmeri Dominion: Rylana Dionysis - DK - AR 25 == Kailiana - NB - AR 21 == Minerva Dionysis - Temp - AR 21 == Victoria Dionysis - Sorc - AR 13
Daggerfall Covenant: Dannika Dionysis - DK - AR 21 == The Catman Rises - Temp - AR 15 (Former Emperor of Blackwater Blade)
Forum LOL Champion (retired) == Black Belt in Ballista-Fu == The Last Vice Member == Praise Cheesus == Electro-Goblin6 -
eventide03b14a_ESO✭✭✭✭✭
✭✭They need to fix the system to prevent "buff campaigns". There should be two 30 day vet campaigns, one can obviously be used for overflow, and one non vet campaign. With only two campaigns and 3 factions it should help to keep people from just allowing those campaigns to remain owned by one faction for too long.
My only concern of course is whether they will ever fix the lag caused by heavy population in those campaigns.:trollin:1 -
Asgari✭✭✭✭✭
✭✭Remove Haderus and Azura's
It would just mean longer queue for EP and AD and still none for DC. Players want to play where the action is. DC has gone to other buff servers to try and make something of it but it just turns to a farm and then they leave.Formerly @Persian_Princess .. Now @Asgari
Princess Asgari | Sorc
Asgari | NB
-Asgari | Stamplar
Ariana Kishi | DK | True Liberator of Haderus
Banner Down!
No Mercy
Youtube: Asgari0
