Should ZOS remove 2 campaigns?

  • ToRelax
    ToRelax
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    ✭✭
    Remove Haderus and Chillrend
    Suru wrote: »
    I think the best route would be to remove one campaign. This way people who like small scale combat would get it because that is where the people who lost that campaign would go. The only downside to this route would be that a faction will be upset. Otherwise I'm fine with how things, want PVP? go thorn, want to PVE, get skyshards, lorebooks, and a tinge of danger of other players while doing so? go to a buff campaign.

    In EU, players who want small scale with less lag tend to go to Azura; The small campaigns are not much fun because the enemies won't fight for winning the campaign whatsoever, just emp trading and buff servers for PvE all the way.

    Of course that with what you said implies it would be better in this issue to just remove PvE buffs and the possibility to get emp in any "not legit" way. But rather shut those servers down instead of doing noting.
    DAGON - ALTADOON - CHIM - GHARTOK
    The Covenant is broken. The Enemy has won...

    Elo'dryel - Sorc - AR 50 - Hopesfire - EP EU
Sign In or Register to comment.