WraithAzraiel wrote: »SienneYviete wrote: »Wonder how many times people see a group that............
Fortunately being oceanic DC
Really AD is talking about shutting down the server. Ok, some may of did it but they learned it from AD. You guys have 0 skill always following the skellie impulse monkey's.
Rollbacks are not 'caused' by players doing a certain thing
AoE Target Cap Updates
Eric recognized the current meta of stacking in AoE and distributing damage throughout your group. This isn’t the gameplay ZOS wants, they want large groups of abilities to be vulnerable to AoE and afraid of AoE. Some important concerns to consider with increasing the AoE cap are:
•Effect on Ultimate generation
•Application of secondary effects (stuns, CCs)
•Additional server load
•Effects on PvE balance
•The solution ZOS is currently considering involves healing remaining capped at 6 targets, but AoE damage being unlimited in the number of targets it can affect, but subjecting that damage to a damage falloff effect where as an AoE hits more and more targets the damage dealt to additional targets decreases by some scaled percentage.
How many times did you post that exact dismissive response on some other forum when people were discussing whether the American Government was spying on American Citizens or not?
..right up until it broke that they were, I bet.

Ifthir_ESO wrote: »impulse, pissing people whiners off since day 1 of this game
serenenightmare wrote: »Rollbacks on thornblade have benefit every faction. Yellow, blue, and red.
jkirchner71ub17_ESO2 wrote: »serenenightmare wrote: »Rollbacks on thornblade have benefit every faction. Yellow, blue, and red.
Dead on. As AD I have more than once seen a rollback bring back a lost scroll as much as I have seen AD lose a scroll.
To be honest "policing PvP" is not the issue here, it is the "mega server" proving it isn't so mega.
How many times did you post that exact dismissive response on some other forum when people were discussing whether the American Government was spying on American Citizens or not?
..right up until it broke that they were, I bet.
The only exercise you are getting is jumping to conclusions and running away with your imagination.
You assume I'm American, that's your second mistake. (the first was arguing over a forum)
Your third assumption is coming to a conclusion all by your self that server load equates to roll backs which I don't see them saying, I do however see you insinuating it.
Increased server load isn't good I'll grant you, but they aren't saying the rollbacks are a result of that load. YOU are suggesting that's the case with your "it would follow... comment"
IF you can get ZOS to state that increased server load creates the rollbacks, then I'll stop making comments about tin foil hats, until then stay frosty brother!
jkirchner71ub17_ESO2 wrote: »serenenightmare wrote: »Rollbacks on thornblade have benefit every faction. Yellow, blue, and red.
Dead on. As AD I have more than once seen a rollback bring back a lost scroll as much as I have seen AD lose a scroll.
To be honest "policing PvP" is not the issue here, it is the "mega server" proving it isn't so mega.
Tell your AD friends, it is as much DC's fault as it is the AD impulse zerg. I know for a fact, everytime they see my name, they call it out on TS and they ball up spamming healing springs before an engage to charge their ultimates.
People need to realize, lots of organized guilds/groups do this prior to an engage. And when hundreds of players on all factions do this, at one keep, the mega server will take a big dump on our chests.
Blame ZoS and the servers, not the players. I don't even blame AD despite the fact that I was informed by AD that there was spam in AD guild chats like "All available AD, join Thornblade now to help crash the campaign"
Keep the focus on ZoS to fix the server issues
I've witnessed multiple rollbacks, first hand. I've also been present for 3 that were intentional over the course of the last 6 months. Search the forums... there are threads where DC Players ADMIT that a small faction within the faction are causing crashes/rollbacks on purpose. It's not exactly a conspiracy.
I've witnessed multiple rollbacks, first hand. I've also been present for 3 that were intentional over the course of the last 6 months. Search the forums... there are threads where DC Players ADMIT that a small faction within the faction are causing crashes/rollbacks on purpose. It's not exactly a conspiracy.
Blah blah blah....words, arguments and bold text.
I too have seen rollbacks first hand, as have pretty much anyone that plays in Cyrodiil consistently, you aren't Robinson Crusoe on that mate. And having experienced a rollback alone doesn't make you an expert on Rollbacks. I've experienced a Solar Eclipse before, that doesn't make me an expert on Eclipse's.
As for what a few people are saying, DC or other factions, I couldn't give a flying Continental, they aren't experts either. There is zero proof (you should have a look at the meaning of the word proof) that anyone is causing roll backs at all, none, zero, zip, nada.
With a hand full of population on a buff server I've seen a rollback... kinda puts a dampener on your conspiracy theory doesn't it?
Give me proof, until then let the tinfoil hats and conspiracy theories abound!