This.If UO was released today as it was back in 1997 it wouldn't last a month. I can see the posts on UO's forums now the first time people lose everything they were wearing and carrying when they died and couldn't get back to their corpse in time.
Crapstorm wouldn't begin to describe it.
Thechemicals wrote: »pitdemon_ESO wrote: »I still play UO on the UO:F server, have played UO in one form or another since 1998, and can say that there is no way you can compare the 2 games.
Also, fishing is the last thing I would use to demonstrate a superior game. Really, wth?
Personally I'm just happy I got to enjoy a great game before the genre was infested with the gimme gimme's.
Yeah im on UO forever as well.
I am comparing the UO system of fishing versus the fishing system in eso. One has so much detail and options while the other is lacking it.
Uo versus Eso is not really the point im making....more like 1997 fishing system had so much substance to it and eso fishing does not. UO wasnt about fishing primarily and neither is Eso, but why is UO fishing so much more detailed and thought out and indepth? I think one reason is that this game had pressure to release sooner. Another is that nobody really cares about fishing or other little things in Eso...its all about having something to do at the end and pvp features. I think the design could have put forth a better effort for fishing.
Ah, UO, my love. They really should've just copied everything that was UO and put it in glorious HD and then we'd have the perfect game! For example:
- UO's justice system is/was superb. Reds, greys, blues. Also Order and Chaos.
- FACTIONS (go Minax!)
- Custom player housing.
- Champ spawns.
- Harrowers. True risk vs reward!
- Non-instanced high-end pvm content (Doom).
- Crafting - runic kits.
- Nightmares (and taming in general).
Don't get me wrong, I'm still loving ESO, but it's not a UO-beater, yet. There's still time!
For nostalgia's sake, have some Barney:
http://www.asrm48.dsl.pipex.com/UO/barneycalltoarms.SWF
DenverRalphy wrote: »Fishy Sticks should require fish as an ingredient.
fromtesonlineb16_ESO wrote: »This.If UO was released today as it was back in 1997 it wouldn't last a month. I can see the posts on UO's forums now the first time people lose everything they were wearing and carrying when they died and couldn't get back to their corpse in time.
Crapstorm wouldn't begin to describe it.
The sad old 'vets' reminiscing about a bygone era are amusing, they totally ignore the fact UO was the only game in town and if you wanted to play an on-line game you had no choice.
Fact is, WOW was the massive 'hit' it was (and still is) because it provided something other than mindless grinding and months of tedium to achieve anything, that's what it still has more players by a factor of 2 or 3 even now because UO-type games aren't what the majority of players want .. or indeed, wanted back then as the numbers of players playing in the 1990s show.
Thechemicals wrote: »120 salmon sells for zero gold, and cannot be cooked or used for anything ..... The future is here. MMO's should just be called fps games if youre going to leave out the details.