Because the pros outweigh the cons so much right now it's generally stupid to not be a vampire.the point is if you are a vampire you should become stronger in some areas and weaker in others.
Vampires are already weak versus fire, Why make the survivability worse? not mad if there is a good reason, I just want that reason.
NadiusMaximus wrote: »The goal is to phase out Vampires, and just have a bunch of emos running around drinking clamatto and reading Poe.
dodgehopper_ESO wrote: »The health regeneration passive at stages 2-4 is not working for my Vampire character. Has anyone else noticed this passive is broken? I find it frustrating since its a waste of two skill points.
NadiusMaximus wrote: »The goal is to phase out Vampires, and just have a bunch of emos running around drinking clamatto and reading Poe.
um the point of this game is for me to escape my real life, not replay it in a game thanks
Because the pros outweigh the cons so much right now it's generally stupid to not be a vampire.the point is if you are a vampire you should become stronger in some areas and weaker in others.
Vampires are already weak versus fire, Why make the survivability worse? not mad if there is a good reason, I just want that reason.
Because the pros outweigh the cons so much right now it's generally stupid to not be a vampire.the point is if you are a vampire you should become stronger in some areas and weaker in others.
Vampires are already weak versus fire, Why make the survivability worse? not mad if there is a good reason, I just want that reason.
ThoradinBloodfire wrote: »I think the goal is to make being a vampire lame and not want to be one. Just like it should be.
Because the pros outweigh the cons so much right now it's generally stupid to not be a vampire.the point is if you are a vampire you should become stronger in some areas and weaker in others.
Vampires are already weak versus fire, Why make the survivability worse? not mad if there is a good reason, I just want that reason.
NadiusMaximus wrote: »The goal is to phase out Vampires, and just have a bunch of emos running around drinking clamatto and reading Poe.
cwbriggs6ub17_ESO wrote: »Because the pros outweigh the cons so much right now it's generally stupid to not be a vampire.the point is if you are a vampire you should become stronger in some areas and weaker in others.
Vampires are already weak versus fire, Why make the survivability worse? not mad if there is a good reason, I just want that reason.
there are way MORE cons for all the skill points spent ... in the end u have good sneak is all..... u fill up slots and match sets to offset bad HR and weakness to fire for what u gain in passives ... if i spent all those skill points elsewhere i could have lots more passives ... u are still weak to fire if u wear 3 enchants ... but ur sneak is good .... the ult is good but there are other good aoe damage ult. Drain and mist form are weak compared to others skills and i removed them from my bar to get thru vr levels before the vr nerf. If i forget to feed then my HR is too low also.
Here is what I would like for Vampires -
1. When in direct sunlight, they take constant damage.
2. When hit by any wooden weapon (Spear, Arrow, etc), it is insta-kill.
3. They must kill and suck at least one player a day in PvP, or begin to die. The player they feed on does die.
4. During the night, they can transform into a bat, and fly.
5. Over time, they age to a decrepit state, and must keep a skill on the bar to look 'nice'.
6. They can only have ONE male apprentice bitten at any time, but may have any number of female apprentices.
7. They cannot be killed by normal weapons.
And, whatever else seems right for Vampires.
There is always going to be issues with others not liking the Vampires abilities. Bat Swarm might do 1k damage each time it is used, but what level was the character using it? What armour did the other player have?
In Vet content I was being hammered by basic skeleton archers with the Volley ability, at the same level as me for over 1k damage and it's not even an Ultimate.
I have had harvesters and liches take me for over 2.5k in one shot. My toon didn't even have 2.5k at the time!! It was in a Vet5 zone.
I think the issue is other players don't like the fact that people can kill them easily so they whine and complain until the build is nerfed. Don't like a vampire attacking you? Use fire or the Fighters Guild silver bolt ability.
Because the pros outweigh the cons so much right now it's generally stupid to not be a vampire.the point is if you are a vampire you should become stronger in some areas and weaker in others.
Vampires are already weak versus fire, Why make the survivability worse? not mad if there is a good reason, I just want that reason.
That is the point exactly. If the cons were equal to the pros, there wouldn't be so many Vamps running around, sparkling in the sunlight.
They need to make Vamps burn in sunlight, and be attacked on sight by guards ... then the cons would be more in line.