please, keep hideous real world away from TES. one thing is to say that lesser nobility, clergy, peasantry, mob and rabble should not be able to wear rich clothing but the other is to support it with the real life historical analogies. while I do not doubt in alchemical prowess of the England's finest craftsmen, I see problems with translating it into the world where mythopoeia's magick dictates everything.wenxue2222b16_ESO wrote: »I'm not saying don't have vivid colours - I'm saying have ones that could occur naturally and in quantities that would be viable naturally. Lapis has a very vibrant blue colour but wasn't used for painting every wall or door or robe because it was (and is) rare and very very expensive. Bright colours in clothing belonged really to the wealthy elite and everyone else wore stuff not far off potato sacks. The Elizabethans in England had a very strict code as to who could wear certain styles and fabrics according to their rank and title.
http://www.elizabethanenglandlife.com/clothing-in-elizabethan-england.html
of course you can! there are breasts on the armour for a reason! I agree, casual but covering skin, no vulgarities!You can be feminine in heavy armor, it's all about the attitude! Which sadly doesn't convey very well in a video game.
I'd love more costumes too. 20 levels later I'm still wearing the Sea Viper armor, but something more casual for an evening in town would be welcome. I don't think I want a potato sack, but some low level light armor would probably work, now that we finally can craft jerkins... I'll have to look into it.
Worst idea ever. I'm not looking forward to the hordes of rainbow bright warriors. It will be immersion breaking, lore breaking, pretty much every kind of breaking you can think of.
Breasts do not make a woman.of course you can! there are breasts on the armour for a reason! I agree, casual but covering skin, no vulgarities!You can be feminine in heavy armor, it's all about the attitude! Which sadly doesn't convey very well in a video game.
I'd love more costumes too. 20 levels later I'm still wearing the Sea Viper armor, but something more casual for an evening in town would be welcome. I don't think I want a potato sack, but some low level light armor would probably work, now that we finally can craft jerkins... I'll have to look into it.
currently, Altmer nobles wear the same rags as ash-bloated filthmer. travesty!
You can be feminine in heavy armor, it's all about the attitude! Which sadly doesn't convey very well in a video game.
I'd love more costumes too. 20 levels later I'm still wearing the Sea Viper armor, but something more casual for an evening in town would be welcome. I don't think I want a potato sack, but some low level light armor would probably work, now that we finally can craft jerkins... I'll have to look into it.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G_XgWtzKO4w technically genes and hormones do. not that I wanted to say that less gifted womer are not well, womer. it is just that armour designs in fantasy seems to accent their femininity; one of the most recognisable symbols: breasts.Breasts do not make a woman.I wasn't talking about them at all, but I'm sure you know it.
technically genes and hormones do. not that I wanted to say that less gifted womer are not well, womer. it is just that armour designs in fantasy seems to accent their femininity; one of the most recognisable symbols: breasts.Breasts do not make a woman.I wasn't talking about them at all, but I'm sure you know it.
I have simply agreed with you by pointing out that heavy armours clearly display gender.
well, yes, it is the most common way to address them. unfortunately there is no Altmer word for females. on the other hand, those were lsser races; humans who copied Altmer language so in a way man/woman might be of Altmer origins. for safety: mer/womer.AlexDougherty wrote: »
Womer??
I would think the high and might Altmer would die before copying the Human terminology of women (even if adjusted for mer istead of men).
well, yes, you are right but breasts displayed on the armour are definately a sign of femininity - in TES at least, where females participate in battles.wenxue2222b16_ESO wrote: »Gender and femininity are not the same thing. Showing off my baps in armour that otherwise makes me look like a pile of scrap metal doesn't make me feel like a lass. A nice dress or two, or a robe that could be used as a costume, would do the trick though.
Like everything else ZOS does, I believe it will be underdeveloped and buggy. Not up to 2014 MMO standards.
starlizard70ub17_ESO wrote: »While I'm not a fan of the bright neons colors that are a part the overall dye selection, too many options are better then no options. On the other hand, it will be alot easier to spot your hated enemy across a PvP battlefield if they're wearing hot pink or neon blue.
stand out with our actions, not necessarily with outfits. golden saints are just that: golden. now imagine bright pink heavy armour.rob.shzaub17_ESO wrote: »For everyone that thinks its too flashy, we are heroes and are supposed to stand out. Heck look at Golden Saint armor lol!
definately there are freaks who wear such horrible outfits. I simply do not want to see them.Who's to say that ESO lore would not include the invention of bright garish colours? The people that wear them could be shunned and become a new faction. It wasn't that long ago that neon colours first hit our own society. Any ideas for a name for the new faction?
stand out with our actions, not necessarily with outfits. golden saints are just that: golden. now imagine bright pink heavy armour.
what history? what kind of fiction? I remember heroes completely different.rob.shzaub17_ESO wrote: »Heroes throughout history and in fiction have been given flashy outfits. My point about Golden Saint is it looks ridiculous like something out of the Immortals movie, way over the top!
Have they given a list of colors that will appear? From the screenshots provided, I only see yellow, white, black, red, blue, green, and gold. Will it be a full rainbow, and who will make dyes?