I quit reading after cute and fluffy....

emeraldbay wrote: »

Rivqua wrote: »

I quit reading after cute and fluffy....

That kind of explains why you have nothing constructive to add.

Ah well, cute and fluffy is my thing. Everyone has different tastes.

*Wants to be cute & fluffy*


*casts dark-magic induced Daedric armor*



Yeah, I'm not following your logic. With bound armor, you are summoning Daedric armor on your person for the apex of protection. Because mystic-spikey armor makes your character look -not- cute & fluffy, you want it removed for everyone else.

Ok then. Speaking purely on logic, your best course of action would be to -not- cast bound armor. Just as I would suggest not to equip heavy armor either, as that would also detract you from a "cute & fluffy" look.

Lord_Hev wrote: »

emeraldbay wrote: »

Rivqua wrote: »

I quit reading after cute and fluffy....

That kind of explains why you have nothing constructive to add.

Ah well, cute and fluffy is my thing. Everyone has different tastes.

*Wants to be cute & fluffy*


*casts dark-magic induced Daedric armor*



Yeah, I'm not following your logic. With bound armor, you are summoning Daedric armor on your person for the apex of protection. Because mystic-spikey armor makes your character look -not- cute & fluffy, you want it removed for everyone else.

Ok then. Speaking purely on logic, your best course of action would be to -not- cast bound armor. Just as I would suggest not to equip heavy armor either, as that would also detract you from a "cute & fluffy" look.

I...think you're misunderstanding. I'm not complaining about how the armor itself looks. I don't mind that it's heavy armor or that it's daedric or whatever, my issue is that it physically changes the look of my character. Makes him more muscle-y, changes his face, that kind of thing. It looks like it took all of the customization sliders and set them back to default. I like the way bound armor itself looks, but I don't like how it changes my character on a deeper level.

That said, it's a known issue, and should be fixed soon-ish.

Aureli wrote: »

It be even nicer if they made Bound armor take the physical appearance of the armor type you are wearing, i.e., you are wearing medium armor and get medium looking bound, or light, rather than just all heavy.

I could see that. The only problem is if you're wearing more than one type of armor, it would have to go with whichever type you were wearing the most of.

Lord_Hev wrote: »

emeraldbay wrote: »

I...think you're misunderstanding. I'm not complaining about how the armor itself looks. I don't mind that it's heavy armor or that it's daedric or whatever, my issue is that it physically changes the look of my character. Makes him more muscle-y, changes his face, that kind of thing. It looks like it took all of the customization sliders and set them back to default. I like the way bound armor itself looks, but I don't like how it changes my character on a deeper level.

That said, it's a known issue, and should be fixed soon-ish.

My apologies then. I've never encountered or noticed that on my character. If that's the case, then yeah, that is a bug.

It's fine, people make mistakes. I'm not certain, but I think it only affects characters who are smaller than the default.

Armann wrote: »

Good news is that guild tabards will show over bound armor. I would love to see them make the different morphs look different, unmorphed should be daedric light armor (jerkin), Armaments would look like daedric medium armor and Aegis remain heavy as is.

Do they? That's good news, I can show off my guild while being tough as daedric nails! And I like the idea of changing the look based on the morph. Here's hoping they fix this bug first though!