Maintenance for the week of April 6:
• [COMPLETE] ESO Store and Account System for maintenance – April 9, 9:00AM EDT (13:00 UTC) - 6:00PM EDT (22:00 UTC)

Do you support a duelling function?

  • Blackwidow
    Blackwidow
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    ✭✭
    Tandor wrote: »
    Blackwidow wrote: »
    @Tandor I believe they have separate people for fixing things and developing things.

    Also, dueling would not impact your world unless you wanted it to, if you had auto decline on.

    Actually it would impact on others, both for the reasons some have already given, and because duelling would lead to yet another bout of class balance whining that would end up in changes that affected everyone..

    There is literally no downside to dueling. It can be auto declined. Kept out of cities. Will never affect your game if you don't want it to.

    What other reasons is there?

    "because duelling would lead to yet another bout of class balance whining "

    Right, because that is not happening now? Give me a break.

    If you are already in a puddle of mud, don't complain you might get dirty.
    Edited by Blackwidow on July 2, 2014 11:39PM
  • Mablung
    Mablung
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    Dools are for tools.
  • Kulrig
    Kulrig
    ✭✭✭
    I think any game with PvP ought to have some sort of dueling function. And as with any pop-up that other people can slap in front of you, there needs to be an autodecline option.
  • Zabus
    Zabus
    ✭✭✭✭
    I duel in cyrodiil all the time we get players from DC, AD and EP all in one TS meet somewhere in the middle of the map and just go at it. 1v1s, 2v2s and even 5v5s when we have enough people xD

    TS is just so we don't get bored while we wait for a duel to end, some have easily gone over 10 minutes.
    Zavus - Khajiit Nightblade EP | AR 50
    Zāv - Imperial Templar | AR 24
    Zavbags - Argonian Nightblade EP | AR 19
    Zabus - Redguard Nightblade DC | AR 13
    Negate Three - Breton Sorcerer EP | AR 19
  • dodgehopper_ESO
    dodgehopper_ESO
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    ✭✭✭
    I think dueling is absolutely a great idea. Its a way for people to iron out their build in relative safety and quickly learn about counters and countering particular attacks. It also lets you figure out numerically what is going on with the game, proving or disproving whether the tooltips are lying to us or not. Transparency is important, and I think a good dueling system would help produce greater transparency. I really don't understand why or how people could vote against it, if you can opt out.
    US/AD - Dodge Hopper - Vet Imperial Templar | US/AD - Goj-ei-Raj - Vet Argonian Nightblade
    US/AD - Arondonimo - Vet Altmer Sorcerer | US/AD - Azumarax - Vet Dunmer Dragon Knight
    US/AD - Barkan al-Sheharesh - Vet Redguard Dragon Knight | US/AD - Aelus Vortavoriil - Vet Altmer Templar
    US/AD - Shirari Qa'Dar - Vet Khajiit Nightblade | US/AD - Ndvari Mzunchvolenthumz - Vet Bosmer Nightblade
    US/EP - Yngmar - Vet Nord Dragon Knight | US/EP - Reloth Ur Fyr - Vet Dunmer Sorcerer
    US/DC - Muiredeach - Vet Breton Sorcerer | US/DC - Nachtrabe - Vet Orc Nightblade
    EU/DC - Dragol gro-Unglak - Vet Orc Dragon Knight | EU/DC - Targan al-Barkan - Vet Redguard Templar
    EU/DC - Wuthmir - Vet Nord Sorcerer | EU/DC - Kosh Ragotoro - Vet Khajiit Nightblade
    <And plenty more>
  • poodlemasterb16_ESO
    poodlemasterb16_ESO
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    I don't much care one way or the other. There do seem to be lots of people who want to duel so I have no problem as long as I get no spam or extra hassles.

    Should not be that hard to implement it, with pretty low impact for the rest of us, so I voted Yes.
  • indytims_ESO
    indytims_ESO
    ✭✭✭✭
    I am fine with Dueling being added - AS LONG AS there is an option to 'auto-decline' duels (i.e. as used in EQ2, for example).

    I have no desire to be spammed by some dbagg wanting to 'prove his worth' by dueling me - and then spamming me with invites even after I decline.
  • mousekime111rwb17_ESO
    the thing with a dueling option the way suggested here (the correct way to implement such a feature) is that just like gay marriage, if you don't want to partake, don't partake and you won't be affected. Adding in a feature like this can ONLY have positive effects.
  • isengrimb16_ESO
    isengrimb16_ESO
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    the thing with a dueling option the way suggested here (the correct way to implement such a feature) is that just like gay marriage, if you don't want to partake, don't partake and you won't be affected. Adding in a feature like this can ONLY have positive effects.

    Unless it causes whining about class balance that hurts PvE, which it inevitably does. As long as devs balance vet PvE and let PvPers slide on their own, then it would be fine. Otherwise, PvP complaints (beyond FPS issues in Cyrodiil, which are legit) should be flatly ignored, as long as PvE play works.


    Edited by isengrimb16_ESO on July 3, 2014 3:06AM
  • mousekime111rwb17_ESO
    the thing with a dueling option the way suggested here (the correct way to implement such a feature) is that just like gay marriage, if you don't want to partake, don't partake and you won't be affected. Adding in a feature like this can ONLY have positive effects.

    Unless it causes whining about class balance that hurts PvE, which it inevitably does. As long as devs balance vet PvE and let PvPers slide on their own, then it would be fine. Otherwise, PvP complaints (beyond FPS issues in Cyrodiil, which are legit) should be flatly ignored, as long as PvE play works.


    Eh, one v one combat will probably be ignored as far as balance is concerned due to it being the outlier style encounter. In AVA you're almost always with a group, in PVE you're almost always with a group. They're not going to nerf magnum shot because it's too powerful in duels...
  • isengrimb16_ESO
    isengrimb16_ESO
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    the thing with a dueling option the way suggested here (the correct way to implement such a feature) is that just like gay marriage, if you don't want to partake, don't partake and you won't be affected. Adding in a feature like this can ONLY have positive effects.

    Unless it causes whining about class balance that hurts PvE, which it inevitably does. As long as devs balance vet PvE and let PvPers slide on their own, then it would be fine. Otherwise, PvP complaints (beyond FPS issues in Cyrodiil, which are legit) should be flatly ignored, as long as PvE play works.


    Eh, one v one combat will probably be ignored as far as balance is concerned due to it being the outlier style encounter. In AVA you're almost always with a group, in PVE you're almost always with a group. They're not going to nerf magnum shot because it's too powerful in duels...

    *snort* My crappy WoW pally would differ on that - ruined because of PvPers complaining that they (Retribution Paladins) were "OP". And no, you're not always in a group in PvE, not even most of the time, especially in ESO. PvP whining ruins PvE play more than anything else. PvPers need to be ignored by developers.


    Playpenning PvP off was probably the most brilliant move I've ever seen. Let PvP remain a ghetto.
    Edited by isengrimb16_ESO on July 3, 2014 3:25AM
  • michael21
    michael21
    ✭✭
    Lets you test, gives you another fun mode.
    Its a great and productive thing to the game imo.
  • MercyKilling
    MercyKilling
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    Oh, look. This thread/poll again.
    I am not spending a single penny on the game until changes are made to the game that I want to see.
    1) Remove having to be in a guild to sell items to other players at a kiosk.
    2) Cosmetic modding for armor and clothing.
    3) Difficulty slider.
    4) Fully customizable player housing that isn't tied to anything in the game other than having the correct resources and enough gold to build. Don't tie it to PvP, guild membership, or anything at all. Oh, make it instanced so as not to take up world map space, too. Zeni screwed this one up already.
    Any /one/ of these things implemented would get me spending again, maybe even subbing.
  • Zorrashi
    Zorrashi
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    Dueling is fine. But there is one little pet peeve I want to express....towns. I don't want duels in towns. I know that I can ignore it, but it can get annoying when they crowd a street.
  • poodlemasterb16_ESO
    poodlemasterb16_ESO
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    Zorrashi wrote: »
    Dueling is fine. But there is one little pet peeve I want to express....towns. I don't want duels in towns. I know that I can ignore it, but it can get annoying when they crowd a street.

    Yeah like in real life. Go outside, don't trash the bar.

    I may have revealed too much. ;)
  • isengrimb16_ESO
    isengrimb16_ESO
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    Zorrashi wrote: »
    Dueling is fine. But there is one little pet peeve I want to express....towns. I don't want duels in towns. I know that I can ignore it, but it can get annoying when they crowd a street.

    Yeah like in real life. Go outside, don't trash the bar.

    I may have revealed too much. ;)

    Frankly, I think PvPers are fern bar types, who would get sick at the idea of a ***/cowboy/riggerpigger bar where they'd be forced to actually back up their big mouths with action.

    Oh? An actual anti-white epithet is banned here? I'm impressed. The censored word starts with R and ends with K.

    I don't see r-e-d-n-e-c-k as a particularly bad word. Cripes, riggerpigger is worse than that, but I guess non-oilpatch oriented folks have no idea what that means.


    Edited by isengrimb16_ESO on July 3, 2014 5:39AM
Sign In or Register to comment.