nerevarine1138 wrote: »
No. Maintenance is included in your subscription price.
To be clear, I want to know if you think they should.
Not what their policies state and not what other games have done.
I personally think the maintenance time for the NA server should be more in line with NA times. If this maintenance had started around 3 am instead of 8, it probably would be done by now.
However, I do think that if you pay for a service that gets interrupted unexpectedly for a long time, the company should reimburse you. I've successfully done this with my phone/internet company and others, irregardless of what their normal terms state.
The question here is, what time frame is considered "long" for this service?
In my opinion, "long" for this service is 24+ hours.
I personally think the maintenance time for the NA server should be more in line with NA times. If this maintenance had started around 3 am instead of 8, it probably would be done by now.
These additional hours could have been the hours of you,
a) Trying to login
b) Writing support tickets + waiting for responses
c) Constantly re-logging because of crashes
d) Wondering where all your bank contents went
e) Wondering why you are in a different account
f) All of the above
Time well spent.
@Atreus I'm glad you think a serious question is funny. I just wanted to find out what others thought.
@Islyn Nice constructive addition to the conversation.
@Katniss_Everlark Funny, I remember getting reimbursed game time there before too, but that doesn't matter here as it is a different company. As for knowing this will happen, I'm used to it. I just don't think it should be that way. If they planned the maintenance to be longer in the beginning, say 8 hours instead of the 4 they initially said, then people wouldn't plan their day around 4 hours and wind up complaining.
They should take a hint from Scotty off of Star Trek, never say it will take the time it will take, always over estimate. Then when it doesn't take that lone, people are pleasantly surprised.
nerevarine1138 wrote: »They probably will, but I really wish they wouldn't. It always makes people feel like their whining accomplished something. So the next time servers are down a minute longer than anticipated, the forums get even more inundated with ridiculous polls like this.
Katniss_Everlark wrote: »@Atreus I'm glad you think a serious question is funny. I just wanted to find out what others thought.
@Islyn Nice constructive addition to the conversation.
@Katniss_Everlark Funny, I remember getting reimbursed game time there before too, but that doesn't matter here as it is a different company. As for knowing this will happen, I'm used to it. I just don't think it should be that way. If they planned the maintenance to be longer in the beginning, say 8 hours instead of the 4 they initially said, then people wouldn't plan their day around 4 hours and wind up complaining.
They should take a hint from Scotty off of Star Trek, never say it will take the time it will take, always over estimate. Then when it doesn't take that lone, people are pleasantly surprised.
That's the thing though @dragnier, they only expected it to be 4 hours not any longer until they got close to the 4 hour window. Things happen while they are implementing the patch that is out of their control & they want to fix it before they bring the servers back up.
I played WoW for 4 1/2 years. The only time I ever remember the servers being down longer than the scheduled down time was when Wrath of the Lich King expansion went live. The game was down almost all day, came up around 10pm est. I was able to create & play my death knight through the starting area just in time to have an announcement come up saying server shut down in 5 minutes. I didn't cry about not being able to play or try & get back the day & a half that was lost to maintenance. I was glad that they did every thing to get it right so they didn't have to do it again & take a whole other day.
They are doing the right thing in making sure everything is how it should be no matter how long it takes for it to be done.
nerevarine1138 wrote: »They probably will, but I really wish they wouldn't. It always makes people feel like their whining accomplished something. So the next time servers are down a minute longer than anticipated, the forums get even more inundated with ridiculous polls like this.
It's been a bit more than a minute longer.... It's been 5 hours longer. I have now lost an entire afternoon of play due to extra downtime and (due to the fact i work a night schedule) that results in the entire day. Can you honestly answer why it wouldn't be reasonable for a change of policy to take place where they do compensate for egregious downtime resulting in the loss of days off account time?
nerevarine1138 wrote: »They probably will, but I really wish they wouldn't. It always makes people feel like their whining accomplished something. So the next time servers are down a minute longer than anticipated, the forums get even more inundated with ridiculous polls like this.
It's been a bit more than a minute longer.... It's been 5 hours longer. I have now lost an entire afternoon of play due to extra downtime and (due to the fact i work a night schedule) that results in the entire day. Can you honestly answer why it wouldn't be reasonable for a change of policy to take place where they do compensate for egregious downtime resulting in the loss of days off account time?
Ragnar_Lodbrok wrote: »
What you think because the downtime was long they squashed bugs?