So in other words, Tiber Septim is a Nord meaning EP wins. K.
Iirc the premise for ESO is that there was little to no records of emperors of Cyrodil because the alliance wars kept interfering with any sort of historical documentation (which is why we can become emperor and it not effect the lore). This of course ends when Talos leads skyrims army south and establishes his dynasty. So that leads me to believe that the conflict never truly ends until Talos is crowned.
Curragraigue wrote: »Spoilers but if you want to know have a look at the link below to see how it all pans out. Have linked the current time period which is pre-Oblivion and Skyrim. Pretty clear from those sp games who eventually 'won'.
http://www.uesp.net/wiki/Lore:Interregnum
During the entirety of Interregnum, petty warlords had attempted to seize control of Cyrodiil's capital and to reestablish the Empire. None of them lasted for long
Ruze is a veteran of the PC Beta, lived through the year one drought, survived the buy-to-play conversion, and has stepped foot in the hells known as Craglorn. He mained a nightlbade when nightblades weren't good, and has never worn a robe. He converted from PC during the console betas, and hasn't regretted it a moment since.
He'd rank ESO:TU (in it's current state) a 4.8 out of 5, loving the game almost entirely.
Curragraigue wrote: »Spoilers but if you want to know have a look at the link below to see how it all pans out. Have linked the current time period which is pre-Oblivion and Skyrim. Pretty clear from those sp games who eventually 'won'.
http://www.uesp.net/wiki/Lore:Interregnum
Not exactly. That article is unreliable. Are you referring to this line?During the entirety of Interregnum, petty warlords had attempted to seize control of Cyrodiil's capital and to reestablish the Empire. None of them lasted for long
That line is cited by a citation that has absolutely nothing to with the claim. Whoever edited did not provide a reliable in game or out of game reference.
ruze84b14_ESO wrote: »Imperials.
Seriously. I like my progress through the alliances so far, but I've yet to meet a single leader who will do more than stall the inevitable. It's not because they don't have the capability, but because it's all too close to them.
Doesn't help that each alliance is a clusterfudge in it's own way. Ebonheart Pact (my home), far too militant, and the Dunmur mess it all up. Daggerfall has a huge issue between the aloofness of the Redguard and the uncivilized nature of the Orcs. And let's not get into the Admeri Dominion and their treatment of the 'lesser' races.
In the end, the only group that will be able to reunite the Empire, are the ones who already did it before, and will do it again. Imperials. Guys like Abner Tharn, who cares more about the Empire than his own family tree.
They'll fight the Pact. They'll use subterfuge to break down the Covenant. And they'll ally with the Dominion. Wheel, deal, fight or steal ... doesn't matter the means, only the result.
Mannimarco is just a pretender. Emperors and Empresses come and go. Daedric Lords have awfully short power cycles. In the end, it'll be the Imperial people who make the difference.
ruze84b14_ESO wrote: »Imperials.
Seriously. I like my progress through the alliances so far, but I've yet to meet a single leader who will do more than stall the inevitable. It's not because they don't have the capability, but because it's all too close to them.
Doesn't help that each alliance is a clusterfudge in it's own way. Ebonheart Pact (my home), far too militant, and the Dunmur mess it all up. Daggerfall has a huge issue between the aloofness of the Redguard and the uncivilized nature of the Orcs. And let's not get into the Admeri Dominion and their treatment of the 'lesser' races.
In the end, the only group that will be able to reunite the Empire, are the ones who already did it before, and will do it again. Imperials. Guys like Abner Tharn, who cares more about the Empire than his own family tree.
They'll fight the Pact. They'll use subterfuge to break down the Covenant. And they'll ally with the Dominion. Wheel, deal, fight or steal ... doesn't matter the means, only the result.
Mannimarco is just a pretender. Emperors and Empresses come and go. Daedric Lords have awfully short power cycles. In the end, it'll be the Imperial people who make the difference.
born2beagator wrote: »ruze84b14_ESO wrote: »Imperials.
Seriously. I like my progress through the alliances so far, but I've yet to meet a single leader who will do more than stall the inevitable. It's not because they don't have the capability, but because it's all too close to them.
Doesn't help that each alliance is a clusterfudge in it's own way. Ebonheart Pact (my home), far too militant, and the Dunmur mess it all up. Daggerfall has a huge issue between the aloofness of the Redguard and the uncivilized nature of the Orcs. And let's not get into the Admeri Dominion and their treatment of the 'lesser' races.
In the end, the only group that will be able to reunite the Empire, are the ones who already did it before, and will do it again. Imperials. Guys like Abner Tharn, who cares more about the Empire than his own family tree.
They'll fight the Pact. They'll use subterfuge to break down the Covenant. And they'll ally with the Dominion. Wheel, deal, fight or steal ... doesn't matter the means, only the result.
Mannimarco is just a pretender. Emperors and Empresses come and go. Daedric Lords have awfully short power cycles. In the end, it'll be the Imperial people who make the difference.
To me the Aldmeri Dominion is a lot different with Queen Ayrenn (who seems to be more accepting of other races) at the helm than the Xenophobic Dominion we saw in Skyrim.
Curragraigue wrote: »Curragraigue wrote: »Spoilers but if you want to know have a look at the link below to see how it all pans out. Have linked the current time period which is pre-Oblivion and Skyrim. Pretty clear from those sp games who eventually 'won'.
http://www.uesp.net/wiki/Lore:Interregnum
Not exactly. That article is unreliable. Are you referring to this line?During the entirety of Interregnum, petty warlords had attempted to seize control of Cyrodiil's capital and to reestablish the Empire. None of them lasted for long
That line is cited by a citation that has absolutely nothing to with the claim. Whoever edited did not provide a reliable in game or out of game reference.
If you read the whole of the last two paragraphs from that link it has all the information you need to answer your question.
If you play Oblivion the Emperor also explains the pedigree of the Emperor. Not sure what sort of "source" you expect to find, it cites two in game books. The lore comes from books and conversations in the ES games the two books are cited in the last paragraph and the text from those books supports what the paragraphs state, so not sure what more information you want.
Theoretically speaking, the latest in the TES time line (Skyrim) has the Thalmor calling the shots. So eventually...
So who eventually won?
I'm not convinced the alliance war lasts over 300 years.
The ebonheart pact and daggerfall covenent are fragile alliances. I don't see the orcs staying with the bretons long after their current leader dies. The ebonheart pact's unity as is thin as ice, which the in-game quests reveal.
That just leaves the aldmeri dominion to war it out the rest of the time. That's not likely.
Theoretically speaking, the latest in the TES time line (Skyrim) has the Thalmor calling the shots. So eventually...
The state of the empire during the intereggnum is sort of like the Roman empire during the crisis of the third century (roughly 200 C.E to about 300 C.E). I think thats where bethesda got their inspiration for it.
During the crisis of the third century there was many many roman emperors. Many of them didn't even last a year. The crisis was also ended by a series of powerful emperors (Compare diocletian to Cuchelain and constantine to tiber septim).
Anyone else see this comparison as accurate?