nerevarine1138 wrote: »
A lot actually, as you like to say... google it.
nerevarine1138 wrote: »nerevarine1138 wrote: »
A lot actually, as you like to say... google it.
I did. The only thing I found was that there's an obscure type of whip that's used in a Japanese martial art, but no historical records of whips actually being used in combat in any significant way. Whips are impractical, unwieldly and pointless in any fight.
So. If you have an actual, historical example of whips being used in combat by actual fighters, I'd love to see it.
nerevarine1138 wrote: »
nerevarine1138 wrote: »In what culture/world have whips been an actual weapon?
Really?cubansyrusb16_ESO wrote: »nerevarine1138 wrote: »
Egypt
nerevarine1138 wrote: »In what culture/world have whips been an actual weapon?
In the Indiana Jones culture, that's where!
nerevarine1138 wrote: »nerevarine1138 wrote: »
A lot actually, as you like to say... google it.
I did. The only thing I found was that there's an obscure type of whip that's used in a Japanese martial art, but no historical records of whips actually being used in combat in any significant way. Whips are impractical, unwieldly and pointless in any fight.
So. If you have an actual, historical example of whips being used in combat by actual fighters, I'd love to see it.
Traditional whips no, but look up the Urumi (spelling?). It is pretty much a flexible blade swung around. It is treated as a whip.
nerevarine1138 wrote: »Really?cubansyrusb16_ESO wrote: »nerevarine1138 wrote: »
Egyptnerevarine1138 wrote: »In what culture/world have whips been an actual weapon?
In the Indiana Jones culture, that's where!
I'm pretty sure that's the only place I've seen that, too.nerevarine1138 wrote: »nerevarine1138 wrote: »
A lot actually, as you like to say... google it.
I did. The only thing I found was that there's an obscure type of whip that's used in a Japanese martial art, but no historical records of whips actually being used in combat in any significant way. Whips are impractical, unwieldly and pointless in any fight.
So. If you have an actual, historical example of whips being used in combat by actual fighters, I'd love to see it.
Traditional whips no, but look up the Urumi (spelling?). It is pretty much a flexible blade swung around. It is treated as a whip.
It's a flexible blade. By those standards, a fencing foil is a whip.
Uh, no. a fencing foil cannot rollup like rope or be snapped like a whip. A Urumi can. It is not a sword and cannot be used like one.
nerevarine1138 wrote: »Really?cubansyrusb16_ESO wrote: »nerevarine1138 wrote: »
Egyptnerevarine1138 wrote: »In what culture/world have whips been an actual weapon?
In the Indiana Jones culture, that's where!
I'm pretty sure that's the only place I've seen that, too.nerevarine1138 wrote: »nerevarine1138 wrote: »
A lot actually, as you like to say... google it.
I did. The only thing I found was that there's an obscure type of whip that's used in a Japanese martial art, but no historical records of whips actually being used in combat in any significant way. Whips are impractical, unwieldly and pointless in any fight.
So. If you have an actual, historical example of whips being used in combat by actual fighters, I'd love to see it.
Traditional whips no, but look up the Urumi (spelling?). It is pretty much a flexible blade swung around. It is treated as a whip.
It's a flexible blade. By those standards, a fencing foil is a whip.
cubansyrusb16_ESO wrote: »nerevarine1138 wrote: »Really?cubansyrusb16_ESO wrote: »nerevarine1138 wrote: »
Egyptnerevarine1138 wrote: »In what culture/world have whips been an actual weapon?
In the Indiana Jones culture, that's where!
I'm pretty sure that's the only place I've seen that, too.nerevarine1138 wrote: »nerevarine1138 wrote: »
A lot actually, as you like to say... google it.
I did. The only thing I found was that there's an obscure type of whip that's used in a Japanese martial art, but no historical records of whips actually being used in combat in any significant way. Whips are impractical, unwieldly and pointless in any fight.
So. If you have an actual, historical example of whips being used in combat by actual fighters, I'd love to see it.
Traditional whips no, but look up the Urumi (spelling?). It is pretty much a flexible blade swung around. It is treated as a whip.
It's a flexible blade. By those standards, a fencing foil is a whip.
Yeah ... really ... do you think they beat slaves with pillows ?
beating someone is still using something to beat them with as a weapon.
That, and the Dragon Leap ultimate are the 2 main reasons I will start a DK. Like I just got silver bolts skill from Fighter's Guild cause it looks awesome. And pretty useful too but it was only the second reason I got it.frozenchicken wrote: »Here's your problem: You're all looking in the Sorceror skill tree.
http://elderscrollsonline.info/lava-whip
nerevarine1138 wrote: »nerevarine1138 wrote: »
A lot actually, as you like to say... google it.
I did. The only thing I found was that there's an obscure type of whip that's used in a Japanese martial art, but no historical records of whips actually being used in combat in any significant way. Whips are impractical, unwieldly and pointless in any fight.
So. If you have an actual, historical example of whips being used in combat by actual fighters, I'd love to see it.
nerevarine1138 wrote: »
nerevarine1138 wrote: »But it does mean that they usually don't add weapons which would be wholly impractical. Like whips, crossbows, etc.
nerevarine1138 wrote: »
indiana jones :P need i say more XD and whips are perfectly good and awesome weapon in my opinion. i also would love big crossbows and dual hand crossbows, cant really see any reason people could complain about lore on them either with all that "lost" dwemer tech hehe.
That, and the Dragon Leap ultimate are the 2 main reasons I will start a DK. Like I just got silver bolts skill from Fighter's Guild cause it looks awesome. And pretty useful too but it was only the second reason I got it.
nerevarine1138 wrote: »But it does mean that they usually don't add weapons which would be wholly impractical. Like whips, crossbows, etc.Crossbows were one of the single most important advancements in historical warfare. I really have no idea where you get any of your information.
No sense in belaboring such a basic segment of history, but I would direct you here at least: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_crossbows
Now would crossbows be an effective weapon in close combat during an extended fight? Probably not. It's ranged weaponry. But you don't use a bow in close quarters either. Short weapons like daggers would also be useless against anybody with a large weapon. Most of the weaponry in game would be utterly ineffectual in many of the circumstances it's used.
Just say flat out that you, personally, do not think those weapons should be added and leave it at that. No need for arguments based in fallacy.
nerevarine1138 wrote: »
Except for one obscure Chinese "repeating crossbow", the crossbow is entirely impractical for solo combat, due to the long reload times. A good archer can nock and loose an arrow from a bow about 4 times while a crossbowman is still cranking their string back. They're not meant to be used outside of large-scale engagements.