UTC is the the "same" as GMT actually. The problem with using GMT instead of UTC is that people who live in countries that use GMT as a normal time thinks that they are still in GMT why the daylight saving time is applied. The BST timezone is GMT with DST.
Another name for UTC is Zulu time which is used mostly in the military. (as well as in some TV series I used to follow like JAG where they always expressed times as Zulu)
But yes I have to think very carefully when reading US dates especially if the day of the month is below 12. Like is 9/11 really 11th of September or 9th of November.
13.
UTC is the the "same" as GMT actually. The problem with using GMT instead of UTC is that people who live in countries that use GMT as a normal time thinks that they are still in GMT why the daylight saving time is applied. The BST timezone is GMT with DST.
Another name for UTC is Zulu time which is used mostly in the military. (as well as in some TV series I used to follow like JAG where they always expressed times as Zulu)
But yes I have to think very carefully when reading US dates especially if the day of the month is below 12. Like is 9/11 really 11th of September or 9th of November.
13.
If we all try and encourage Americans to be international the world will be a better place. Use UTC for times - it's a standard. Use ISO formats for dates - it's a standard.
And actually windows also uses a time offset - Take a look at the timezones: UTC+/- x.
Best solution would be that they write the month to avoid confusion. Yes in a way April 30, 2014 makes more sense than 30. April, 2014. However then again DD/MM/YYYY makes more sense than MM/DD/YYYY.
There's a difference between actually writing the name of the month and just the number. We also would write it as 30th of April 2014. The 'th' is very important there, but American English tends to abbreviate a lot of things so not really strange you didn't think of it.But I do not like the European date format, it just does NOT make any sense to me. When we write dates out, we right April 30, 2014. We don't write 30 April 2014. So it makes sense that the abbreviation should be written the same way.
There's a difference between actually writing the name of the month and just the number. We also would write it as 30th of April 2014. The 'th' is very important there, but American English tends to abbreviate a lot of things so not really strange you didn't think of it.But I do not like the European date format, it just does NOT make any sense to me. When we write dates out, we right April 30, 2014. We don't write 30 April 2014. So it makes sense that the abbreviation should be written the same way.
Frankly the whole calender system is a bit borked imo, having to add a day every 4th year...
UTC is the the "same" as GMT actually. The problem with using GMT instead of UTC is that people who live in countries that use GMT as a normal time thinks that they are still in GMT why the daylight saving time is applied. The BST timezone is GMT with DST.
Another name for UTC is Zulu time which is used mostly in the military. (as well as in some TV series I used to follow like JAG where they always expressed times as Zulu)
But yes I have to think very carefully when reading US dates especially if the day of the month is equal or below 12. Like is 9/11 really 11th of September or 9th of November.
For all practical purposes, UTC is the same as Greenwich Mean Time. Technically they are not the same, but in practice they are. Unix machines run their hardware clocks on UTC, and the OS does translation to display local time. Unlike Windows.
Even though I'm American, I *strongly* support metric and celsius over what we use here. :P But I do not like the European date format, it just does NOT make any sense to me. When we write dates out, we right April 30, 2014. We don't write 30 April 2014. So it makes sense that the abbreviation should be written the same way.
Best solution would be that they write the month to avoid confusion. Yes in a way April 30, 2014 makes more sense than 30. April, 2014. However then again DD/MM/YYYY makes more sense than MM/DD/YYYY.
Personally, I find those two statements to be contradictory. April 30, 2014 makes more sense. But the abbreviation shouldn't be in a different format just because you change the month to a number.
DD/MM/YYYY is an abbreviation for 30 April 2014.
To add to the confusion from us Swedes. When we write dates including the year we use yyyy-mm-dd. But when we omit the year it is generally written as dd/mm. This is the reason for me having to think when I see 9/11
BenjaminKacher_ESO wrote: »As a side note, can you guys (All of Europe) decide on one name for it? GMT, UTC and Zulu are all the same thing... talk about not wanting to conform to a standard.